On 5 Mar 2013, at 22:05, David Levy wrote:
> In any case, a fix there would not solve the general problem of not
> being able to get all BusyCal email interactions to work with
> MailMate. I think Benny would need to get in touch with them again,
> advise them of the current state of custom UR
On 4 Mar 2013, at 20:43, Alexandre Takacs wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it has been already covered in the past but what is
> the status of about using MM in conjunction with BusyCal v2 ?
>
> It would be really nice to have both program working in unison?
>
Hi Alexandre
There was some integration be
Dear all
I'm pretty sure it has been already covered in the past but what is the
status of about using MM in conjunction with BusyCal v2 ?
It would be really nice to have both program working in unison?
Regards
A. Takacs
