On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 03:50:30PM +0200, Michael Nietzold wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Catch-all is available with many other providers, but
> the issue is the "wildcard" sending feature, which allows sending emails
> without predefined aliases.
> That’s the challenge I’m facing in my search for
Thanks for the info. Catch-all is available with many other providers,
but the issue is the "wildcard" sending feature, which allows sending
emails without predefined aliases.
That’s the challenge I’m facing in my search for a new email
provider.
On 5 Sep 2024, at 14:40, Felix Kronlage-Damm
Hi,
> On 5. Sep 2024, at 14:33, Michael Nietzold
> wrote:
> Thanks, but it's not suitable for my use case since there's a maximum of 25
> aliases, and each alias must be defined manually in advance.
Mailbox.org allows for Catchall (actually necessary if you want to send with
arbitrary sender
My mistake: 250 – but I still need to create them in advance.
On 5 Sep 2024, at 14:32, Michael Nietzold wrote:
Thanks, but it's not suitable for my use case since there's a maximum
of 25 aliases, and each alias must be defined manually in advance.
On 4 Sep 2024, at 11:37, Charlie Clark wrote
Thanks, but it's not suitable for my use case since there's a maximum of
25 aliases, and each alias must be defined manually in advance.
On 4 Sep 2024, at 11:37, Charlie Clark wrote:
On 28 Aug 2024, at 17:17, Michael Nietzold wrote:
I’m now looking for an email provider that supports both of
On 2 Sep 2024, at 17:28, Verdon Vaillancourt wrote:
> My response would be to tell the sender that their email is non-conforming to
> email standards, that you are unable to read it, and that they will have to
> resend it through another provider. Don’t fall to this kind of pressure. Put
> the
