Re: [MlMt] Check for Test Build

On 6 Mar 2024, at 12:16, Fredrik Jonsson wrote: > #2 and #4 display the same results > 6016 is the latest version available. You have version 6024. > > I'm on 6016 and I can replicate the issue, for me #2 and #4 show different > results. > > My guess is that this small bug has been fixed in 6023

Re: [MlMt] "X-Envelope-to" - should be more visble

On 2024-03-06 at 14:54:26 UTC-0500 (Wed, 06 Mar 2024 20:54:26 +0100) Michael Nietzold is rumored to have said: But it would be nice to have some settings to include some more headers to be indexed. Maybe somehow with defaults write The issue is not indexing. MM indexes all headers, no matter

Re: [MlMt] "X-Envelope-to" - should be more visble

On 6 Mar 2024, at 13:54, Michael Nietzold wrote: There are 61k are in a Submailbox where I have condition: X-Envelope-To -> exists = araound 85% I'm guessing you might have been associated with a mail server that adds this header to your mail. In my experience it's rare: I have `X-Envelope-

Re: [MlMt] "X-Envelope-to" - should be more visble

Interesting in my case are 61k of 71k have this header (85%) of my mails I tried your advice with an smart mailbox to count the amount of `x-envelope-to` :) On 6 Mar 2024, at 18:22, John Doherty wrote: I don't know if this helps, or whether you have already done it, but you can create a smar

Re: [MlMt] "X-Envelope-to" - should be more visble

Out of 71k in "All Messages" There are 61k are in a Submailbox where I have condition: `X-Envelope-To` -> `exists` = araound 85% It seems some Mailer "destruct" many recipients or mailing lists from the `to` into the "real" e-mail where it is delivered to. I just found it because I inspected

Re: [MlMt] Check for Test Build

MM_Arc via mailmate 2024-03-06 19:12 wrote: > #2 and #4 display the same results > 6016 is the latest version available. You have version 6024. I'm on 6016 and I can replicate the issue, for me #2 and #4 show different results. My guess is that this small bug has been fixed in 6023 or 6024. Fr

Re: [MlMt] Check for Test Build

Hello Quinn, I checked the behaviour you described on my system (MacOS 12.7.3 - MM r6024) I can’t seem to reproduce your findings #2 and #4 display the same results *6016 is the latest version available. You have version 6024.* Might be an idea to recheck. Or provide some more details on the

Re: [MlMt] "X-Envelope-to" - should be more visble

I don't know if this helps, or whether you have already done it, but you can create a smart mailbox that selects messages in which the "X-Envelope-To" header exists (or does or doesn't match or include certain strings, etc.). When you're creating the Conditions for the smart mailbox, you have

Re: [MlMt] "X-Envelope-to" - should be more visble

On 2024-03-06 at 04:21:38 UTC-0500 (Wed, 06 Mar 2024 10:21:38 +0100) Michael Nietzold is rumored to have said: I have some spam mails which uses the `X-Envelope-to:` header Can you quantify that? I see none in a corpus of a half-million messages going back to the 90's. But which headers are

[MlMt] Use an SMTP server without an associated IMAP server?

I have about a dozen email addresses and they all eventually end up in the same Fastmail IMAP account, either because they're my domains and the MX is set up to deliver there, or because they're forwarded from other mail services over which I have less control. My most-used email address is thi

[MlMt] "X-Envelope-to" - should be more visble

I have some spam mails which uses the `X-Envelope-to:` header Some of them are don't have a `to:` header If I just search in the mail mate search box it not find this emails. I need explicit use `X-Envelope-to: myn...@mydomain.com` to find it. What can I do that the normal search also includ