On 19 Feb 2015, at 23:10, David Morrison wrote:
The way e-mail is going nowadays, it needs to be able to be accessed
on whatever device you are currently using.
Not only that, but the configuration etc. would need to be synchronised
across devices.
WebMail offers this and now it's being dem
On 2015-02-18 02:24, Fredrik Jonsson wrote:
I used to have a lot of rules that moved both received and sent mails
to folders per person/company/project etc. Always fretting where to
stora mail, "Is this more project or company or ".
With MailMate I dump everything I have processed in to "Archi
I couldn't reproduce it again ;/
The old draft is now gone so can't check.
It was created in mailmate afaik.
On 19 Feb 2015, at 8:41, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
I don't seem to be able to reproduce that. It should only happen if
the message does not have the `\Draft` keyword set (“Raw Flags”
On 19 Feb 2015, at 17:06, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote (with possible
deletions):
On 19 Feb 2015, at 12:47, Torsten Grust wrote:
I use a `Tags` mailbox that contains submailboxes for each unique tag
value:
Starting with r5060, I noticed that (multiple, actually) submailboxes
with an
empty tag v
On 19 Feb 2015, at 12:47, Torsten Grust wrote:
I use a `Tags` mailbox that contains submailboxes for each unique tag
value:
Starting with r5060, I noticed that (multiple, actually) submailboxes
with an
empty tag value show up:
These submailboxes contain messages that I have tagged since r50
On 19 Feb 2015, at 8:41, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
I don't seem to be able to reproduce that. It should only happen if
the message does not have the `\Draft` keyword set (“Raw Flags”
column in the messages outline). Does it work if you double-click the
draft in the Drafts folder? Was the draft
Hi Benny,
I'm seeing a regression that relates to submailbox naming. I have
noticed
it with r5060 the first time.
I use a `Tags` mailbox that contains submailboxes for each unique tag
value:
![](cid:3DA2579C-D2A0-4B44-8AE2-81214D12A86E@gmail.com "ScreenCapture at
Thu Feb 19 12:34:40 CET 20
On 19 Feb 2015, at 12:57, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
got new updated and noticed that replying on mail that I have an
existing draft now opens up in read only mode so I can't actually edit
the draft.
Creating new replies works fine.
I don't seem to be able to reproduce that. It should only
If you haven't tried yet then I recommend using the Layout > Threaded
which
I made (with great help from Benny) that automatically fetches and shows
all threads
for *any* message removing (IMO) needs for doing custom thread-id
lookups in the smart folders.
Just a tip ;)
/max
Hi all,
I ac
hi,
got new updated and noticed that replying on mail that I have an
existing draft now opens up in read only mode so I can't actually edit
the draft.
Creating new replies works fine.
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
___
mailmate mailing list
mailm
**Addendum**: Ah, I just see that you are using a gmail address: This
will not work with Gmail-accounts as they unfortunately throw away
messages sent back from list server – one of the reasons for me not
to use gmail.
Then I would try to include a condition which catches mailing list
posting
On 19 Feb 2015, at 5:59, David Morrison wrote:
That's fine if all your messages for a particular smart folder have
some common factor, such as a mailing list name. But what happens when
the mailing list changes its name or host or something?
I use this for my mailing lists:
- the IMAP sorts
12 matches
Mail list logo
