On 16 Jul 2014, at 18:58, Luca Allodi wrote:
I may be wrong but aren't subject lines public by definition, like
user names? Think indexing and archiving.
It is certainly useful for indexing/display, but if the receiving email
client can decrypt the subject line then that would not be a
(theo
One solution would be to silently accept the entered subject, but then
replace it with something like "Encrypted Email - PGP," or something
more "cryptic" (no pun intended) while moving the subject to the first
line of the email like this:
Subject: My username is spandex1, passwd is pqowiefjpo
I may be wrong but aren't subject lines public by definition, like user names?
Think indexing and archiving.
--
Sent from mobile
http://disi.unitn.it/~allodi
DISI - University of Trento
> Il giorno 16/lug/2014, alle ore 16:36, "Benny Kjær Nielsen"
> ha scritto:
>
>> On 16 Jul 2014, at 15:41,
On 16 Jul 2014, at 15:41, Brad Knowles wrote:
ISTR that some clients will auto-replace the unencrypted subject line
with the contents of the encrypted subject (and other headers), once
the message is decrypted. And going the other way, they will put in a
placeholder like "Encrypted subject" i
On 16 Jul 2014, at 7:53, Scott A. McIntyre wrote:
I just replicated it at home - same result. Crash after going to
Statistics Layout, selecting Other, searching for "date" in the upper
right hand box, then selecting the "Date" option without the asterisk,
then clicking OK. Took about 8 to 10
On Jul 16, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Bram Heerink wrote:
> I think (most) people do know when they think about it. But are you aware
> enough all the time? Reason I suggested this change is I composed an
> encrypted e-mail and then remembered 'oh subject is not encrypted' and then I
> changed it. But
Would it be nice to warn users that are trying to send encrypted
e-mail about this with a "don't warn me anymore" option?
I'm not sure how many encryption users are unaware of this limitation
(especially MailMate users). I'll note the idea, but do any other
email clients warn about this?
I t
> Does anyone have a canned approach that works out-of-the-box (i.e. without
> extensive modifications to .conf files and all that stuff?)
I'm using offlineimap for that. It's not really a canned approach, how
you call it, but Steve Losh wrote about it here
http://stevelosh.com/blog/2012/10/the-ho
