On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:54, Dries Geeroms wrote:
I prefer plain text as well, but we have to use signatures following
the
company's guidelines at work...
This is the primary reason that MailMate now supports HTML signatures.
My hope is that this is all they are ever going to be used for, but I
On 7 Mar 2014, at 0:14, Steve Mayer wrote:
Make sure that in the MailMate preferences, under Software Updates
that you have 'Beta Builds' selected in the 'Watch for' item. Then
ensure that you hold down the Option key when clicking on the 'Check
Now' button. You need to do this to check for
yep did all that. Might be my computer, I'll try again after a restart
later today.
thanks!
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Steve Mayer wrote:
Dries,
Make sure that in the MailMate preferences, under Software Updates that
you have 'Beta Builds' selected in the 'Watch for' item. Then ensur
Dries,
Make sure that in the MailMate preferences, under Software Updates
that you have 'Beta Builds' selected in the 'Watch for' item. Then
ensure that you hold down the Option key when clicking on the 'Check
Now' button. You need to do this to check for beta builds.
Thanks,
--
Steve
Looks like I'm missing out on the latest beta build, double checked the
updates but I get:
> MailMate 4025 is the latest version available—you have 4025.
First time this happens. Any ideas?
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Steve Mayer wrote:
> Dries,
>
>From the release notes on the lates
Dries,
From the release notes on the latest beta build (4057):
Revision 4057 (Thursday, March 6, 2014)
MailMate now allows signatures to have an HTML alternative to be used
for HTML generation. This has mainly been implemented to help out the
users which have to adhere to a strict company p
How did you end up doing this? Did I miss something in the most recent
update?
I prefer plain text as well, but we have to use signatures following the
company's guidelines at work...
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 12:02 AM, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2014, at 13:07, Giovanni Lanzani wrote:
>
On 5 Mar 2014, at 14:47, Rob McBroom wrote:
What’s the preferred way to report a crash? Here or Lighthouse?
I get the crash report itself automatically if you have allowed MailMate
to send it (see the General preferences pane). Additional details can be
sent using “Help ▸ Send Feedback” or o
On 6 Mar 2014, at 15:15, Giovanni Lanzani wrote:
Enable this:
defaults write com.freron.MailMate MmDebugSecurity -bool YES
And run MailMate like this from the Terminal:
/Applications/MailMate.app/Contents/MacOS/MailMate
Then you might get some additional information. I don't
Signing or encryption failed for unknown reasons
error. Any thoughts? I expect this to be hard to track down due to the
uncommon setup, so feel free to just ignore me :)
Giovanni
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 14:05, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 7:20, Giovanni Lanzani wrote:
I kind of managed to have Mailmate recognise gpg2 installed via
homebrew (via `ln -s`). Through gpg-agent and pinentry I was able to
have OSX remember my pub/private key passphrase. But there's
On 6 Mar 2014, at 7:20, Giovanni Lanzani wrote:
I kind of managed to have Mailmate recognise gpg2 installed via
homebrew (via `ln -s`). Through gpg-agent and pinentry I was able to
have OSX remember my pub/private key passphrase. But there's still a
(hopefully last) problem: Mailmate still can
On 6 Mar 2014, at 13:07, Giovanni Lanzani wrote:
Hurrah to Benny!
:-)
Just keep this in mind: Your message is 44% bigger than it would have
been without the HTML signature. If ignoring the delivery-related
headers then it's a 73% increase :-) It's not much in bytes (especially
not compared
Hurrah to Benny!
--
Giovanni Lanzani
Data Whisperer @ godatadriven.com
+31 6 5120 6163___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
14 matches
Mail list logo
