On 7/18/25 5:37 PM, Cathryn McGuire wrote:
The .* pattern did not do the job of blocking cc's and bcc's in the Header
Filters of Affinity. It lets them go through, even as hold for moderation has
been chosen.
First, you can't filter on Bcc because Bcc is removed from the message
before bei
Hrm. It doesn't appear that other list members received the email.
How would I look up the message in the list archives?
___
Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@mailman3.org
https:/
Ah, we're not using Postorius, just the API. I see that you can get details
about the email via the command line though, so that might work.
___
Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@
Andy Matthews wrote on 2025-07-18 12:05:
But why did it also send the first email, which appears to have gone
to the list?
Does that email from user-1 show in the list's archives?
Can you confirm if other list members received a copy?
I'm just wondering if a "superuser" received a copy as
Sorry about the delay in getting back. Truth be known, I was a little burnt out
from the merging of MM2 to MM3 and thought I might deal with it all later.
Well, now is later.
The .* pattern did not do the job of blocking cc's and bcc's in the Header
Filters of Affinity. It lets them go through,
Andy Matthews wrote on 2025-07-18 12:47:
How would I look up the message in the list archives?
On the list's main page, there's an "Info" tab with a link to the Archives.
URL probably looks something like:
https://lists.domain.tld/archives/list/t...@lists.domain.tld/
__
On 2025-07-18 20:52:07 - (-), Andy Matthews wrote:
I determined that while there's still an "extra" email being
landing in my text inbox, it is NOT going to the mailing list
because it does not have the list name prefixed to the subject.
If your mail client is capable of being set to s
On 7/18/25 11:07 AM, Andy Matthews wrote:
* I sent another mail FROM user-1 TO acme-closed, and received two emails. One
showed what appears to be a successful send to the mailing list.
What was the content of this message including all headers?
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamb
I determined that while there's still an "extra" email being landing in my text
inbox, it is NOT going to the mailing list because it does not have the list
name prefixed to the subject.
___
Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org
To un
Hello,
did you manage to disable the local registration (with django accounts)?
I am trying to get rid of these locally registered accounts as well.
Background:
I only want authorized accounts (provided by our SSO) to be owners or
moderators with the ability to manage lists...
So, if I block all
Christian Schneider writes:
> did you manage to disable the local registration (with django
> accounts)? I am trying to get rid of these locally registered
> accounts as well.
The easist way to do this is to require SSO authentication to access
webapps (this can be done in the front-end webse
My project is doing testing of our mailing lists and came across what appears
to be a bug. I believe it's not but she insists that it is. So before I do a
bunch of research I wanted to post my steps to reproduce and ask for input. I'm
including the full (redacted) mailing list config at the bott
Even without reading your list config, I'm restraining myself from saying
something about your PM.
What is a MuA supposed to do? To tell you that it's refused to send an
email? 😂
--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223
In an Internet failure case, the #1
Odhiambo, I can understand her confusion. The second email with the rejection
notice makes complete sense. But why did it also send the first email, which
appears to have gone to the list?
___
Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org
To
14 matches
Mail list logo