Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-27 Thread David Chittenden
Donna, I remain very skeptical for how well it will work for those with no vision for the reasons I listed. I was not the only blind person who tested the device I spoke about, and nobody with no vision was able to get it to read anything. That said, please don't confuse my skepticism with acti

Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-27 Thread Donna Goodin
David, with all due respect, you're making a lot of suppositions here. I understand that you didn't feel the device you tested worked well, but you can't extrapolate from that and say that because that device didn't, this one won't either. they're different devices, designed by different peopl

Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-26 Thread David Chittenden
No, your supposition is flawed. I also had am opticon when I was younger, and I became fairly proficient with it. The optican provides direct tactile (haptic) stimulation on the finger. You use that stimulation to correct your camera placement whilst scanning the line. Even the fastest optican

Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-26 Thread Donna Goodin
Actually, David, I'd have to disagree. This may be one of those subjective things that's different for different people. But I used an Optacon as a kid, and with a little practice had no problem moving the device across the page. I think that for me, having the physical page as an anchor wou

Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-26 Thread David Chittenden
Actually, it would be much more difficult to focus than the iPhone. You need to know where each line of text starts, and you need to track each line precisely whilst keeping the text with as little skew as possible. If you think the iPhone is difficult for OCR, you would find this device virtual

Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-26 Thread David Chittenden
This is not the first device of the type. It may well be the smallest. I beta tested a similar device a few years ago to help assess how it might work for blind users. The problem with these devices and the blind is, these devices require exact tracking of each line of text. They also require t

Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-25 Thread Donna Goodin
Hi Anne, Well of course it's always wait and see with any of these things. And it sounds like all they have now is a prototype, so who knows if it'll ever amount to more. And even if they do develop it, I wonder how good the OCR will be. I just thought it looked like an interesting device.

Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-25 Thread Donna Goodin
Hi Erik, I don't think anyone would ever read War and Peace with either device, but it could provide an interesting alternative for short documents. Probably similar to Prismo and Text Grabber, but it seems it might be easier to focus once you got the hang of it. Cheers, Donna On Feb 25, 2014,

Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-25 Thread erik burggraaf
Hi Donna, I've personally been intrigued by the Ectaco C-Pen 3.5 for over a year now. I haven't bought the thing because my business started to impload last year around my personal problems and there was never enough resources to expense the $150 unit. The reviews on it are extremely mixed an

Re: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-25 Thread Anne Robertson
Hello Donna, This is interesting inasmuch as it comes from a well-funded lab. But over the years, I've heard of so many attempts to produce something of this sort and very few of them have come to market. One that has is the TopBraille, which converts printed characters to Braille characters an

Fwd: finger computer for OCR

2014-02-25 Thread Donna Goodin
> Hi all, > > First, forgive the cross-post and the OT post., but as I know reading is a > subject that occupies much space on both lists, it seemed appropriate to post > to both. > > Below is a link I received to an article about a new product under > development. It’s a device that you w