Re: activities (was easy way to use iMessage on mac)

2012-12-02 Thread Alex Hall
acvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Baxter > Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 8:57 AM > To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: activities (was easy way to use iMessage on mac) > > The lag when switching apps only gets worse if you choose a different voice,

RE: activities (was easy way to use iMessage on mac)

2012-12-02 Thread Kliphton . A . M
age- From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Baxter Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 8:57 AM To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: activities (was easy way to use iMessage on mac) The lag when switching apps only gets worse if you choose a di

Re: activities (was easy way to use iMessage on mac)

2012-12-02 Thread Mark Baxter
The lag when switching apps only gets worse if you choose a different voice, and it's the one single drawback to Activities, which is otherwise an extremely powerful way to use VO. I have, now, two activities; the normal one, which I use for everything except messaging clients. I use AIM inste

activities (was easy way to use iMessage on mac)

2012-12-02 Thread Alex Hall
The problem I found with activitiies is that they cause app switching to take a relatively long time. For instance, I used to have an activity that would enable quicknav whenever I entered an application that uses html, like Safari or the App Store. However, I quickly found that when I switched