uot;
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Virtualizing on MacBook Pro
>
>
>>
>> Hey James.
>> I worked at a mac shop and the tech there told me to use 768 mb or
>> ram
>> for xp. He said that he seems to get th best performance
Thanks Matt. Can you run office 2003 okay though?
Thanks
james
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Campbell"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Virtualizing on MacBook Pro
>
> Hey James.
> I worked at a mac shop and the tech there told me t
nse.
Matt.
On 22-Jul-09, at 8:57 AM, James & Nash wrote:
>
> thanks Scott, I'll look into Bootcamp then
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Chesworth"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:48 AM
> Subject: Re: Virtualizing on MacBook Pro
>
thanks Scott, I'll look into Bootcamp then
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Chesworth"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: Virtualizing on MacBook Pro
>
> Hi James,
>
> Virtualising does the job for most things, although once the nove
This brings up an interesting question that I have been meaning to
research. I have a copy of XP ready to install on a computer here.
If I install in bootcamp, how easy is it to move to Fusion. Also, if
I install in a VM can multiple users on the box have access to the XP
(obviously not
Hi James,
Virtualising does the job for most things, although once the novelty
wore off I started to find the slight lag in performance irritating.
If I was doing something where I needed both OS's to be available to
use simultaneously I used to split the ram right down the middle. For
more inte
