Re: QT Applications revisited: A Partial Solution

2012-10-15 Thread Timothy Clark Music
QT. is that quicktime? web site http://www.timothyclarkmusic.wordpress.com phone number should you need to reach me 724-401-1224 check my site for more contact information. thanks and may the good lord keep you and bless you. Timothy On Oct 15, 2012, at 12:41 AM, Jacob Schmude wrote:

Re: QT Applications revisited: A Partial Solution

2012-10-15 Thread Mike Arrigo
This actually may help a friend of mine who has been trying to get the mudder application to work, I think this may be a QT app. Yes, the control could be much better labeled, it should say something like, enable access for assistive devices and third party software. Better yet, just remove the

Re: QT Applications revisited: A Partial Solution

2012-10-14 Thread Jacob Schmude
Hi Mike In a way, it's for both. Hardware devices and their associated drivers face the same challenge as third-party toolkits, i.e. they can't typically plug into the low-level accessibility API. I agree that the option could be better labeled or, failing that, much better documented as to its

Re: QT Applications revisited: A Partial Solution

2012-10-14 Thread Mike Arrigo
Interesting that enabling access for accessible devices would make a difference here, you would think that would be for hardware devices not for tool kits. On Oct 14, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Jacob Schmude wrote: > Hi all, > A while back I posted a question on this list about applications written with