Re: Carbon copy versus time machine

2011-08-19 Thread Mike Arrigo
With the mac, you can hold the option key, press left or right arrow and boot off of your external drive. Once booted, just clone your external drive to your internal, also if you would need to reinstall, you can also do that with speech, these are just a few of the many things that make the mac

Re: Carbon copy versus time machine

2011-08-19 Thread Paul Henrichsen
No. Even with image for windows, you needed to insert a boot cd and pick the backup from wherever you stored it. If you had only one, I suppose you could memorize the keystrokes, but no speech guidance at all. On Aug 18, 2011, at 6:15 PM, Mike Arrigo wrote: > You could make another backup to a

Re: Carbon copy versus time machine

2011-08-18 Thread Mike Arrigo
You could make another backup to an image file and store that some place, though you're probably fine with keeping 1 backup around. The difference between the mac and windows is, should you need to restore your system with a mac, you can do it totally without sighted help. There was never a way

Re: Carbon copy versus time machine

2011-08-17 Thread Paul Henrichsen
Thanks, Mike. That's what I was thinking as well. Of course, you can schedule carbon copy to backup daily, I suppose. I haven't looked at its scheduling options as of yet. When I was using windows, I used to backup using image for windows weekly, but not much more than that. Occasionally, I woul

Re: Carbon copy versus time machine

2011-08-17 Thread Mike Arrigo
I use carbon copy cloner also. About the only advantage time machine might give you is hourly backups of your files that have changed, this might be useful if you make frequent changes to documents or something similar. Otherwise, there is probably no need to use them both. On Aug 17, 2011, at 1