isionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: attention Lioncourt
Do we really want Josh to get tangled up in blue?
On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Michael Busboom wrote:
>
> Keep on keepin' on, Josh, and thanks for the fabulous work you do!
>
> Mike
>
>
> -Original
:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Josh de
> Lioncourt
> Sent: Monday, 26 October, 2009 18:40
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: attention Lioncourt
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you all for the kind words and support.
>
> To answer Chr
t: Re: attention Lioncourt
Hi all,
Thank you all for the kind words and support.
To answer Chris, yes, there is a donation link on the site. It's only been
used twice in all the 2 plus years I've been running the site though.
We'll continue to offer the best resource we possibl
Hi all,
Thank you all for the kind words and support.
To answer Chris, yes, there is a donation link on the site. It's only been used
twice in all the 2 plus years I've been running the site though.
We'll continue to offer the best resource we possibly can. Thanks to all who
have contributed
Here, here!!
On Oct 25, 2009, at 8:45 PM, Mark BurningHawk Baxter wrote:
>
> OH NO! You send two copies of the same message! Somewhere, some
> limited bandwidth user has just been bankrupted by your careless use
> of your unlimited band width, you bourgeoise fat cat capitalist! Go
> buy $5 milli
Hi Josh and all,
I think that these lists and people's web pages, podcasts and other
user community based "help" systems provide a great service to a whole
lot of us. To wit, on Saturday, I'm doing a presentation on Macintosh
at ACB Mid-Atlantic when, roughly a year ago, I was still trying
Michael,
so my argument is to place a few more KB's in a mailing. This will
eliminate the MB's associated with surfing that it often takes to
locate the given articles in their entirety. Mail tend's to be less
of a hog then surfing. as for much of the extra mailings that
hi;
i have to jump in here. We have limited bandwith here where i live,
and we have six computers on the network. SOutheast alaska isn't the
best for internet.
Josh, thanks, for not posting the entire messages, as i know this
would limit our bandwith even more, even if it's something i don't
So we all know what to do. Lets all create a site as successful as
josh and force people to click so we can become ritch just like josh.
On Oct 25, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Josh de Lioncourt wrote:
>
>
> I'm sorry you feel that way. I would appreciate it if you would not
> mis-represent what we'r
OH NO! You send two copies of the same message! Somewhere, some
limited bandwidth user has just been bankrupted by your careless use
of your unlimited band width, you bourgeoise fat cat capitalist! Go
buy $5 million in carbon offsets or you will surely burn in hELL!
Mark BurningHawk B
Josh, there's no reason to apologize. I'd steer away from such
arguments, but you know sometimes it's just difficult not to chime in.
First there's no reason why you can't offset your cost if any as you
see fit. YOur providing the service, someone doesn't like how it's
managed, they can po
Josh, there's no reason to apologize. I'd steer away from such
arguments, but you know sometimes it's just difficult not to chime in.
First there's no reason why you can't offset your cost if any as you
see fit. YOur providing the service, someone doesn't like how it's
managed, they can po
I'm sorry you feel that way. I would appreciate it if you would not
mis-represent what we're doing.
If you had actually read previous messages, we were mainly discussing the
problem that some folks, in some parts of the world, or with some wireless
carriers in the US and elsewhere, have to pa
Lots of people have.
Moderation say that they will implament things that are in the best
interest of the community, yet even though lots of people asked for
the full text to be included, its not happening.
It all boils down to promotion. I've been on josh'is site quite a few
times and I feel that
14 matches
Mail list logo
