Re: CD burning with ITunes verses Simply Burns

2010-12-06 Thread erik burggraaf
Hi Ray, I use simply burns for two reasons. First and foremost, simply burns does for both data and audio, and has features I want, such as disc at once, gapless output, buffer underrun protection, data verification, volume labelling, and on and on. As long as you know where your files reside

Re: CD burning with ITunes verses Simply Burns

2010-12-05 Thread Tim Kilburn
Hi Ray, You don't really have to make the playlist, I just usually do that so that it is easier to remake the CD later and then it is better organized for me. With respect to clutter, you could simply make a folder within iTunes and drop all your burn playlists into it thus your Sources List i

Re: CD burning with ITunes verses Simply Burns

2010-12-05 Thread Sarah Alawami
I use playlists anyways as tha'ts how I organise my stuff so itunes is no big deal. Take care. S On Dec 5, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Ray Foret Jr wrote: > To those of y'all burning audio CD's with both ITunes and Simply burns, which > do y'all recommend and why? IN short, is there any advantage in us

CD burning with ITunes verses Simply Burns

2010-12-05 Thread Ray Foret Jr
To those of y'all burning audio CD's with both ITunes and Simply burns, which do y'all recommend and why? IN short, is there any advantage in using ITunes to burn audio CD's over Simply Burns? Seems to me that in order to burn CD's using ITunes, you've first got to make a play list of the file