please let us know how that goes. :)
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
> Okay, we've been discussing Audio Hijack Pro and how inaccessible
> the "Effects" tab is? Well there may be another way around this.
>
> I regularly use the Scripting function of Audio Hijack Pro, you can
Okay, we've been discussing Audio Hijack Pro and how inaccessible the
"Effects" tab is? Well there may be another way around this.
I regularly use the Scripting function of Audio Hijack Pro, you can
set the software to run a Workflow automator script so given that?
Well I can't see why one c
