Hi guys
I have to agree with Ricardo here. I would hate to be a company that hacked off
the blind community, especially if they attempted to mess with our
accessibility. I don't think these guys are going to be real happy with the
results. I don't need to explain why to you guys.
Regards,
Gigi
Hi,
But their is 1 key difference in all those other cases. Those are all
cosmetic. Win or lose, none of those things changes the level of access one
has to their device. Unlike in this instance. Changing how a battery
indicator looks, or if you slide or tap to unlock, doesn't impede thousa
A lot of the patent cases are ridiculous. While Apple was the victim in this
particular one, they have done their share of causing problems with it too. The
most intense stuff does seem to be between Apple and Samsung, but again, the
whole patent system has problems. For example, patenting the w
I totally agree. Even still, this was a pretty stupid move by Samsung. If
nothing else, its a bad PR move. I don't think I'll be buying another Samsung
product after this.
Ricardo Walker
rica...@appletothecore.info
Twitter:@apple2thecore
www.appletothecore.info
On Feb 23, 2013, at 9:09 AM, M
I doubt this even gets off the ground, but it goes to show how ridiculous this
patent thing has gotten. The entire patent system needs to be redone.
On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Maccessibility wrote:
> Maccessibility has posted a new item, 'Samsung struggles to block iPhone
> function for the b
Maccessibility has posted a new item, 'Samsung struggles to block iPhone function for the blind'
Samsung has suffered a setback in its effort to win an iPhone ban based on a function making its software accessible to blind people.
The South Korean firm had sought an injunction in a German
