Re: MacPorts 2.10.0-beta1 now available for testing

On 2024-07-18 at 15:43:27 UTC-0400 (Fri, 19 Jul 2024 05:43:27 +1000) Joshua Root is rumored to have said: Source code and pkgs for MacPorts 2.10.0-beta1 are now available [1]. Testing of either of these install methods is helpful. DATA POINT: Installed from package on a 2018 MBP 13" with Son

Re: MacPorts 2.10.0-beta1 now available for testing

On 2024-07-22 at 16:18:31 UTC-0400 (Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:18:31 -0400) Bill Cole is rumored to have said: On 2024-07-18 at 15:43:27 UTC-0400 (Fri, 19 Jul 2024 05:43:27 +1000) Joshua Root is rumored to have said: Source code and pkgs for MacPorts 2.10.0-beta1 are now available [1]. Testing of e

Re: MacPorts 2.10.0-beta1 now available for testing

> On Jul 22, 2024, at 17:31, Bill Cole > wrote: > > On 2024-07-22 at 16:18:31 UTC-0400 (Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:18:31 -0400) > Bill Cole > > is rumored to have said: > > On 2024-07-18 at 15:43:27 UTC-0400 (Fri, 19 Jul 2024 05:43:27 +1000)

Re: MacPorts 2.10.0-beta1 now available for testing

Bill Cole wrote: Surprisingly few issues, and I like the way this spat out at the end so I didn't need to read the whole scrollback: ---> Note: Migration finished with errors. The following ports could not be restored: - clang-12 Skipped becuase its dependency llvm-

Re: MacPorts 2.10.0-beta1 now available for testing

On Jul 18, 2024, at 14:43, Joshua Root wrote:Source code and pkgs for MacPorts 2.10.0-beta1 are nowavailableAs I reported two months ago, this release contains a change that breaks some instances of "port select" and some port installations. #70051 (manpages are not compressed on macOS 10.15 and la

Re: MacPorts 2.10.0-beta1 now available for testing

Bill Cole : > The following ports were restored with changes: > - openjdk17-zulu > state changed from 'installed' to 'inactive' > - openjdk21-temurin > state changed from 'installed' to 'inactive' > In what circumstances do ‘restores’ like this happen? A change from ‘installed’ to ‘inactive’ does