Re: Using RAM instead of disk for build servers (was: Re: Build servers offline due to failed SSD)

2021-03-15 Thread Steven Smith
SSD RAID offers speed and fault tolerance. Simple options that are tolerant to a single disk failure are: Free/one extra SSD: Use macOS Disk Utility to RAID 1 together two smaller, inexpensive SSD drives for 100% redundancy. OWC ThunderBay 4 Mini, $279: Use macOS Disk Utility to RAID 1 together

Re: Using RAM instead of disk for build servers

2021-03-15 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Steven Smith wrote: > SSD RAID offers speed and fault tolerance. > > Simple options that are tolerant to a single disk failure are: > > * Free/one extra SSD: Use macOS Disk Utility to RAID 1 together two > smaller, inexpensive SSD drives for 100% redundancy. > * OWC ThunderBay 4 Mini, $27

Re: Using RAM instead of disk for build servers (was: Re: Build servers offline due to failed SSD)

2021-03-15 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 14, 2021, at 6:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > As far as longevity, the previous set of 3 500 GB SSDs I bought for these > servers in 2016 lasted 4-5 years. They were rated for 150 TBW (terabytes > written) and actually endured around 450 TBW by the time they failed, or 3 > times as long as

Re: Using RAM instead of disk for build servers (was: Re: Build servers offline due to failed SSD)

2021-03-15 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 14, 2021, at 6:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > As far as longevity, the previous set of 3 500 GB SSDs I bought for these > servers in 2016 lasted 4-5 years. They were rated for 150 TBW (terabytes > written) and actually endured around 450 TBW by the time they failed, or 3 > times as long as

Re: Using RAM instead of disk for build servers

2021-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 15, 2021, at 16:26, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Mar 14, 2021, at 6:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> As far as longevity, the previous set of 3 500 GB SSDs I bought for these >> servers in 2016 lasted 4-5 years. They were rated for 150 TBW (terabytes >> written) and actually endured around

Re: Using RAM instead of disk for build servers (was: Re: Build servers offline due to failed SSD)

2021-03-15 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021, Daniel J. Luke wrote: Thanks for including this information - it's similar to experience I've had with SSDs for $work. I'd be really surprised if we care about builds on the xserves in 8-10 years (given our previous experience with the ppc to x86 transition). Somewhat re

Re: Using RAM instead of disk for build servers (was: Re: Build servers offline due to failed SSD)

2021-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 15, 2021, at 09:50, Steven Smith wrote: > SSD RAID offers speed and fault tolerance. Sure. That either wasn't available or was not within what I was willing to spend in 2016 when I set up this system. > Simple options that are tolerant to a single disk failure are: > > • Free/one

Re: Build servers offline due to failed SSD

2021-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 11, 2021, at 20:15, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Have you looked at something like this for fast storage/cache : > > https://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/SSDACL4M20GB/ > https://www.amazon.de/ASRock-Ultra-Quad-Controller-Karte-PCI-Express/dp/B079TQ9C6Q/ref=sr_1_6 > > Setting these up in