Re: Apple ARM binary codesign issue

Let's try this again from my MP email so that it gets to lists ... sorry for duplicate emails! I've finally gotten to the point of working out a hack solution. One can -not- modify '/usr/bin' without a lot of effort. But, one can modify '/Applications/Xcode[-beta].app/Contents/Developer/Toolcha

ImageMagick port outdated

I was seeking for a means to convert Apples new HEIC/HEIF format to more traditional formats and I always remembered ImageMagick being a good choice for that. Unfortunately the macports version is quite outdated. 6.9.11-29 vs. 7.0.10-30 being the latest. How can I get a newer version via macpo

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Hello Christoph, here's there's a discussion about version 7: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/5014 and here https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51310. It probably will be provided as a separate port. On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:40 PM Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > I was seeking for a m

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Moreover, HEIC format seems to be included here: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/6021 Are there any problems? On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:58 PM Ruben Di Battista wrote: > > Hello Christoph, > > here's there's a discussion about version 7: > https://github.com/macports/macports-port

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Hi Christoph, I use imagemagick every day and IMv7 introduces a number of changes, in particular the "magick" command which replaces the previous "identify", "convert", "montage", "composite" etc. commands. The CLI parser has been rewritten and following the previous CLI parameters order will not

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Hi Sean, Ruben, thanks. I’m using macOS Catalina 10.15.6. I’m wondering though how I would achieve getting the libheic delegate into the current IM 6 in macports. Also I don’t want to use jpeg since the target is png. heic->png — Christoph > Am 25.09.2020 um 20:31 schrieb Sean DALY : > > Hi

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Christoph - just substitute png for jpeg in my example and leave out the formatOptions specific to JPEG Sean On Friday, September 25, 2020, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > Hi Sean, Ruben, > > thanks. I’m using macOS Catalina 10.15.6. > > I’m wondering though how I would achieve getting the libheic

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Sean, "possible to invoke the previous parser" -- Do you mean that some of the IMv6 commands can be used with IMv7, simply by prefixing with "magick" and a space? I wonder how many of the many ports depending on IMv6 could be satisfied with this simple patch. On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:32 PM Se

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Dave - that is my understanding, but I haven’t tested it. I have a ton of scripts and code snippets which would break with IMv7 and my Macs also run older OSes so I am not in a rush to move to IMv7. I use sips often in conjuction with imagemagick, the sips color profile and metadata handling is exc

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Why not just offer both ImageMagick 6 and Imagemagick 7. The user could then choose which he wants to use. Fred > On Sep 25, 2020, at 1:02 PM, Sean DALY wrote: > > Dave - that is my understanding, but I haven’t tested it. I have a ton of > scripts and code snippets which would break with IMv

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Short answer, that is being considered, and it will take some work. Details in the ticket showed below by Ruben: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51310 On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:10 PM Fred Weinhaus wrote: > Why not just offer both ImageMagick 6 and Imagemagick 7. The user could > then choose wh

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

Fred, part of the issue is how a user would call the tools needed. IMv6 has separate programs: identify, convert, mogrify, compare, composite, montage, and these are just the main ones. IMv7 regroups all these called by “magick”, but that is also a (little-used) program name in IMv6 with a differen

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:10 PM Fred Weinhaus wrote: > > Why not just offer both ImageMagick 6 and Imagemagick 7. The user could then > choose which he wants to use. +1. Compilers do it regularly. $ ls /opt/local/bin/gcc-* /opt/local/bin/gcc-ar-mp-5 /opt/local/bin/gcc-nm-mp-5 /opt/local/bi

Re: Failure to upgrade outdated

Thank you, Christopher and Ruben. I repeated versions of port -f activate xxx 15 times each followed by another port upgrade outdated and was hopeful that the process would eventually succeed. However, I have now encountered the following situation: ---> Computing dependencies for pstoedit --

Re: [MacPorts] WikiFormatting modified

On Sep 25, 2020, at 18:50, MacPorts Wiki wrote: > > Page "WikiFormatting" was changed by JDLH > Diff URL: > > Revision 7 > Comment: Add example of GitHub commit link with abbreviation On Sep 25, 2020, at 19:33, MacPorts Wiki

Re: ImageMagick port outdated

On Sep 25, 2020, at 10:40, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > I was seeking for a means to convert Apples new HEIC/HEIF format to more > traditional formats and I always remembered ImageMagick being a good choice > for that. > Unfortunately the macports version is quite outdated. > 6.9.11-29 > > vs

Re: [MacPorts] WikiFormatting modified

On 2020-09-25 17:55, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Sep 25, 2020, at 18:50, MacPorts Wiki wrote: Page "WikiFormatting" was changed by JDLH Diff URL: Revision 7 Comment: Add example of GitHub commit link with abbreviation On Sep 25,

Re: Protocol for updating wiki pages at trac.macports.org?

On 2020-09-08 09:14, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Sep 7, 2020, at 18:24, Jim DeLaHunt wrote: Hello, MacPorts folks: Is there a protocol for making improvements to wiki pages at trac.macports.org beyond, "log in, press the edit button, and make the change"? I have a documentation improvement that w