This can be applied also to virtualenv. What you need to do, imho, is to
just create conda envs. They're isolated from system interpreters and they
should not collide with anything. In these envs you can install whatever
you want... And keep it from interfering with system packages...
On Mon, 12
Hi all,
Could someone with more knowledge please indicate how to test if a Portfile has
the test phase coded in Tcl. I need to pragmatically check if a Portfile has
either the test.run set to 'yes' or if the 'test {}' code block exists in a
Portfile. I was trying to prepare a script to run in
Yeah, I've found pyenv works for this as well, and rvm also works for ruby.
—Mark
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:22 AM Ruben Di Battista
wrote:
> This can be applied also to virtualenv. What you need to do, imho, is to
> just create conda envs. They're isolated from system interpreters and they
> sh
Hi,
- On 12 Aug, 2019, at 14:30, Artur Szostak aszos...@partner.eso.org wrote:
> Could someone with more knowledge please indicate how to test if a Portfile
> has
> the test phase coded in Tcl. I need to pragmatically check if a Portfile has
> either the test.run set to 'yes' or if the 'test
As I’m working my way to somewhat knowing what I’m doing, I have a question.
I always set the timeout on sudo on my systems to 0 seconds. So, for every sudo
command I enter, I have to type the password. This is somewhat safer than
having a timeout (normally 300sec).
This becomes tedious when th
Dear Gerben,
We have a FAQ entry on that, I just couldn't find it right now.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:40, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>
> But I’m wondering if I should move back to running everything as ordinary
> user.
No.
What if one of the ports has "rm -rf $HOME" inside the Makefile?
And what if
I have my own cloud git directory tree
I cd to $thattree/net/unbound
I edit the Portfile (startupitem), set revision to 1 (there was no revision)
I run sudo port install unbound
It is not built and installed as nothing has changed (but there has)
What am I forgetting?
Gerben Wierda
Chess and the
port edit
> On 13 Aug 2019, at 01:24, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>
> I have my own cloud git directory tree
> I cd to $thattree/net/unbound
> I edit the Portfile (startupitem), set revision to 1 (there was no revision)
> I run sudo port install unbound
> It is not built and installed as nothing has ch
> On 2019-08-12, at 19:24, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>
> I run sudo port install unbound
I think you need to run `port upgrade unbound`. `install` will not upgrade
packages.
If that does not work, try going into the directory of the Portfile and run
`port -f upgrade` (no package name argument).
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 01:24, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>
> I have my own cloud git directory tree
> I cd to $thattree/net/unbound
> I edit the Portfile (startupitem), set revision to 1 (there was no revision)
> I run sudo port install unbound
> It is not built and installed as nothing has changed (but
> On Aug 9, 2019, at 06:32, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
> > I am re-building current GIMP on 10.5 (I have a couple of local patches to
> > adapt it, last time they gave me a nice working app).
> >
> > Buld fails for me with:
> >
> >
> > .0 -lintl -Wl,-framework -Wl,CoreFoundation -lbabl-0.1 -l
> On Aug 9, 2019, at 18:50, Andrew Udvare wrote:
>
> > I can see one way: alias port or the Homebrew command to fix PATH to remove
> > either because this is the main point of conflict. And you have to make
> > sure you don't install other conflicting commands. So something that is
> > installe
12 matches
Mail list logo