Re: Ethereum

2018-01-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 17 January 2018 at 08:09, Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT & Internet) via macports-users wrote: > Am 17. Januar 2018 03:45:22 MEZ schrieb Terry Barnum : >>(eth) with "brew install ethereum". I couldn't find geth, eth or >>ethereum in macports. Any plans to add these? > > I think there is a misunde

Re: Ethereum

2018-01-17 Thread Niels Dettenbach via macports-users
Hi Mojca, Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2018, 11:11:09 CET schrieb Mojca Miklavec: > To make it clear, it's perfectly OK if unexperienced users request new > ports. Thanks for your clearification - this was partly new to me. In my former personal understanding and experiences macports "byself" contrib

lldb-6.0 build failure

2018-01-17 Thread David
I’m using a version of Apple’s clang that doesn’t support thread local storage (Apple LLVM version 7.0.2 (clang-700.1.81), from 2014). When I tried to install lldb-6.0 it failed because that compiler didn’t support thread local storage. Is there a way to force the build for lldb-6.0 to use my in

Re: lldb-6.0 build failure

2018-01-17 Thread Chris Jones
What OSX version are you running ? Is your Xcode up to date for that version ? > On 17 Jan 2018, at 12:25 pm, David wrote: > > I’m using a version of Apple’s clang that doesn’t support thread local > storage (Apple LLVM version 7.0.2 (clang-700.1.81), from 2014). When I tried > to install lld

Re: lldb-6.0 build failure

2018-01-17 Thread Ken Cunningham
On 2018-01-17, at 4:25 AM, David wrote: > I’m using a version of Apple’s clang that doesn’t support thread local > storage (Apple LLVM version 7.0.2 (clang-700.1.81), from 2014). When I tried > to install lldb-6.0 it failed because that compiler didn’t support thread > local storage. > > Is t

Re: can macports be less strict with aux packages download?

2018-01-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 16 January 2018 at 18:07, islaind via macports-users wrote: > can macports be less strict with aux packages download? > --- > (on osx 10.8.5, port version 2.4.2) > > In installing xpdf 'port' decides to install perl 5.24 (I have already > insta

Re: lldb-6.0 build failure

2018-01-17 Thread David
I’m on 10.11.6 and completely up to date. The problem is that Apple didn’t add thread local support to their version of clang until after 10.11. So my Xcode won’t compile anything that requires thread local support. This is weird. I would expect that any requirement like that would be part of t

Re: lldb-6.0 build failure

2018-01-17 Thread Chris Jones
On 17/01/18 16:03, David wrote: I’m on 10.11.6 and completely up to date. The problem is that Apple didn’t add thread local support to their version of clang until after 10.11. So my Xcode won’t compile anything that requires thread local support. This is weird. I would expect that any requi

Re: binary packages for 10.5.8

2018-01-17 Thread Riccardo Mottola via macports-users
Hi, Chris Jones wrote: many reasons. For instance security. In my view users should always migrate their machines to the most up to date OS they can run, one that is still receiving security updates, in order to not expose themselves to possible issues. 10.5 for sure hasn't received any secur

Re: can macports be less strict with aux packages download?

2018-01-17 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 17 16:48:02, mo...@macports.org wrote: > On 16 January 2018 at 18:07, islaind via macports-users wrote: > > can macports be less strict with aux packages download? > > --- > > (on osx 10.8.5, port version 2.4.2) > > > > In installing xpdf '

Re: can macports be less strict with aux packages download?

2018-01-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 17 January 2018 at 18:06, Jan Stary wrote: > On Jan 17 16:48:02, mo...@macports.org wrote: >> On 16 January 2018 at 18:07, islaind via macports-users wrote: >> > can macports be less strict with aux packages download? >> > --- >> > (on osx 10.8

Re: binary packages for 10.5.8

2018-01-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 17, 2018, at 10:59, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > However 10.5 runs considerably faster on 32bit macs.s and those who cannot > take 4GB of RAM. My own experience I see; I hadn't heard that feedback before. According to Apple, 10.6 focused not on new features but on performance, so it should

Re: binary packages for 10.5.8

2018-01-17 Thread Chris Jones
On 17/01/18 17:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 17, 2018, at 10:59, Riccardo Mottola wrote: However 10.5 runs considerably faster on 32bit macs.s and those who cannot take 4GB of RAM. My own experience I see; I hadn't heard that feedback before. According to Apple, 10.6 focused not on new f

Re: binary packages for 10.5.8

2018-01-17 Thread Chris Jones
On 17/01/18 16:59, Riccardo Mottola wrote: Hi, Chris Jones wrote: many reasons. For instance security. In my view users should always migrate their machines to the most up to date OS they can run, one that is still receiving security updates, in order to not expose themselves to possible is

Re: binary packages for 10.5.8

2018-01-17 Thread Riccardo Mottola via macports-users
Off topic :) Ken Cunningham wrote: To get reasonable performance out of these machines I always max out the Ram (cheap cheap cheap on Ebay) and in most of them, flip in an SSD. I tried outting a SSD in mine, but it run hiccups... so I bought a new spinning rust HD and that one works fine. Sti

Re: 10.13.2 supplemental update & root account

2018-01-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 16, 2018, at 03:13, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> Using the root account is not recommended; you should use an admin account >> instead. >> >> If you must use the root account, and you have no admin account with which >> to enable it the normal way, you can appa