> On Nov 16, 2016, at 12:09, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> The only thing that could be done would be a slight delay between
>> master and "stable". For example everything that's in master would go
>> to "quasi-stable" after a week unless some
The MacPorts Project is pleased to announce the release of version
2.3.5. This is a bugfix release with small changes only, but the first
we cut from our new home at GitHub. See the ChangeLog [1] for the list
of changes.
If you already have MacPorts installed, the preferred method for
updating is
Good work!
Now, not to sound critical or anything, but when are we going to see the
various comments generated for various builds summarised at the end?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
On Nov 17, 2016, at 16:43, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> Now, not to sound critical or anything, but when are we going to see the
> various comments generated for various builds summarised at the end?
What do you mean? What builds? What comments?
Are you taking about the formatting and content of t
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Nov 17, 2016, at 16:43, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>>
>> Now, not to sound critical or anything, but when are we going to see the
>> various comments generated for various builds summarised at the end?
>
> What do you mean? What builds? Wha
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > Now, not to sound critical or anything, but when are we going to see
> > the various comments generated for various builds summarised at the
> > end?
>
> What do you mean? What builds? What comments?
The comments that appear after some installs (OK,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> > What do you mean? What builds? What comments?
>
> I think he means aggregation of port notes.
Yes, those... I'd forgotten the precise term.
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> No, I'm talking about something that was planned for 2.3.4, and got told
> something like "next version", so it sounds relevant to me...
>
They are planned for 2.4, not any release in the 2.3 series. 2.4 is not yet
usable for non-developers