Re: verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 6, 2017, at 09:33, db wrote: > > I would expect some output without verbose flag like > > $ port livecheck [port] > [port] seems to be up to date > > Not worth a feature request, I guess. I'm pretty sure it's intentional that, like many other unix commands, no output is meant to signify

Re: verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread db
I would expect some output without verbose flag like $ port livecheck [port] [port] seems to be up to date Not worth a feature request, I guess. On 6 Mar 2017, at 15:05, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 6, 2017, at 08:03, db wrote: >> >> I meant try with other ports, e.g., emacs >> >> $ port li

Re: verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 6, 2017, at 08:03, db wrote: > > I meant try with other ports, e.g., emacs > > $ port livecheck emacs > $ > $ port -v livecheck emacs > emacs seems to be up to date > > Not all ports give the same output with livecheck without -v. Ah, I see. Yes, when non-verbose output is empty, it's

Re: verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread db
I meant try with other ports, e.g., emacs $ port livecheck emacs $ $ port -v livecheck emacs emacs seems to be up to date Not all ports give the same output with livecheck without -v. On 6 Mar 2017, at 14:54, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 6, 2017, at 07:53, db wrote: > >> Try with emacs. > >

Re: verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 6, 2017, at 07:53, db wrote: > Try with emacs. Sorry, I've never used emacs.

Re: verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread db
Try with emacs. On 6 Mar 2017, at 14:47, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 6, 2017, at 07:44, db wrote: > >> Do you know of any means that I'm not aware of to make livecheck output its >> result without -v? > > > There doesn't seem to be any difference in livecheck output when using the > verbos

Re: verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 6, 2017, at 07:44, db wrote: > Do you know of any means that I'm not aware of to make livecheck output its > result without -v? There doesn't seem to be any difference in livecheck output when using the verbose flag: $ port livecheck gcc7 gcc7 seems to have been updated (port version:

Re: verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread db
Do you know of any means that I'm not aware of to make livecheck output its result without -v? On 6 Mar 2017, at 13:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Mar 6, 2017, at 03:46, db wrote: >> >> Is there any way to enable verbose output _after_ entering shell mode with >> `port`? I'd rather not use

Re: verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 03:46, db wrote: > > Is there any way to enable verbose output _after_ entering shell mode with > `port`? I'd rather not use `port -v`, then I get it unnecessarily for all > commands. Not that I know of.

verbose output in shell mode

2017-03-06 Thread db
Is there any way to enable verbose output _after_ entering shell mode with `port`? I'd rather not use `port -v`, then I get it unnecessarily for all commands.