> On 5 Jan 2017, at 23:16, Christopher Jones wrote:
>
[..]
> One last question, just a thought, but what exactly are you aiming to gain
> from this setup ? most ports have binaries available direct from macports. I
> have multiple machines and have never really had any issues with just letting
> On 5 Jan 2017, at 9:46 pm, Peter Brommer wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
>> On 5 Jan 2017, at 16:08, Chris Jones wrote:
>
>> Presumably the first machine, that creates the local binaries runs just
>> fine, but then the second doesn't use these for this one port, and att
Hi Chris,
thanks for your reply.
> On 5 Jan 2017, at 16:08, Chris Jones wrote:
> Presumably the first machine, that creates the local binaries runs just fine,
> but then the second doesn't use these for this one port, and attempts to
> build again from source ? If correct, is this really a p
Hi,
when you say 'breaks your setup' what exactly do you mean ?
Presumably the first machine, that creates the local binaries runs just
fine, but then the second doesn't use these for this one port, and
attempts to build again from source ? If correct, is this really a
problem ? From the disc
Hi,
it appears that gmp @6.1.2_0 breaks my macports setup, due to its use of
“archive_sites” in the Portfile (to avoid installing from precompiled binaries).
I have two Macs, and I use the setup described in
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/howto/ShareArchives2 - one machine creates the
local bi
