Riccardo Mottola via macports-users writes:
> Question: GIMP works quite fine, but compared to the official build I
> got on the website (which is for 10.6 and up though), in our version all
> controls look like GTK on X11, while in the other one they look more
> mac-like, some look being even na
Hi,
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
That sounds like you're using the X11 variant of the ports, and not the Quartz
variant.
one last update that "proves" that our build is somehow different than
the one fistributed by GIMP.
First, I tried using the binary built on 10.5 on another computer and it
didn't
Hi,
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Question: GIMP works quite fine, but compared to the official build I got on
the website (which is for 10.6 and up though), in our version all controls look
like GTK on X11, while in the other one they look more mac-like, some look
being even native.
Is this a differen
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 10:45, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
> Hi Ryan,
>
>> No we don't have a 10.5 i386 builder, and as I said there's practically no
>> reason why anyone should use such a system, since all Intel Macs that
>> support 10.5 can and should upgrade to 10.6.
>
> Well.. I quite like 10
Hi Ryan,
No we don't have a 10.5 i386 builder, and as I said there's
practically no
reason why anyone should use such a system, since all Intel Macs that
support
10.5 can and should upgrade to 10.6.
Well.. I quite like 10.5. The story is that I had a MacBook previously
running 10.6.8, it g
On Dec 12, 2017, at 18:48, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Riccardo Mottola via macports-users wrote:
>
>> Ok... fine... I will open an issue on track. I don't see an obvious error I
>> understand so I ask help.
>> Does the buildbot run 10.5 x86?
>
> 10.5 Intel is rarely t
> On Dec 12, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Riccardo Mottola via macports-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Ok... fine... I will open an issue on track. I don't see an obvious error I
> understand so I ask help.
> Does the buildbot run 10.5 x86?
>
10.5 Intel is rarely tested by anyone.
Recently the build of
Hi,
On 2017-12-12 21:51:45 +0100 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Usually Trac is better unless you really don't know what to do.
cmake was built successfully on the buildbot.
Ok... fine... I will open an issue on track. I don't see an obvious
error I understand so I ask help.
Does the buildbot run
On 12 December 2017 at 19:00, Riccardo Mottola via macports-users wrote:
>
> then, one of the dependencies (cmake) breaks builds.
> Should I directly open a bug on trac or is it preferred to post and discuss
> the log here on the list?
Usually Trac is better unless you really don't know what to do
Hi Ryan,
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
The "+no_x11" variant is a hack MacPorts used a decade or more ago, because of
a deficiency of MacPorts base that would not record in the registry any variants the user
had requested to disable (only those the user had requested to enable). That deficiency
was fix
On Dec 11, 2017, at 03:21, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> I wanted to build Leopard on my 10.5 MacBook and perhaps also on my other
> Macs.
> gimp.org provide binaries that work on 10.6 and up and run natively without
> X11. I use them with quite some success on my 10.6.8 Mac.
> The way of installin
Hi all,
I wanted to build Leopard on my 10.5 MacBook and perhaps also on my
other Macs.
gimp.org provide binaries that work on 10.6 and up and run natively
without X11. I use them with quite some success on my 10.6.8 Mac.
The way of installing through MacPorts is recommended by GIMP.org itself
13 matches
Mail list logo
