Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-12 Thread Horst Simon
Hi Steven, I was finally able to run a test on the failing rspamd, I am not familiar with reading this core dumps and followed the instructions given in the URL, i got following from lldb: lldb `which /opt/local/bin/rspamd` -c /cores/core.89034 (lldb) target create "/opt/local/bin/rspamd" --c

Re: [portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 03:51, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > > Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > > Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to drop > > some of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable (for > > everything dependent on it) version is possible on every

Re: [portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
raf wrote: > > i hope python27 wont't go away. > > cheers, > raf https://pythonclock.org/ -- Bjarne D Mathiesen Korsør ; Danmark ; Europa -- denne besked er skrevet i et (næsten) M$-frit miljø MacOS X 10.13.6 High Sierra :

Re: [portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Richard L. Hamilton wrote: >> Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to drop >> some of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable (for >> everything dependent on it) version is possible on every supported OS. And >> it would

Re: [portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread raf
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > > Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to > > drop some of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable > > (for everything dependent on it) version is possible on every > > supported OS. And it would m

Re: [portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > Depending on the results, with some effort, it might be possible to drop some > of the intermediate versions. But only if a later suitable (for everything > dependent on it) version is possible on every supported OS. And it would mean > bumping portfiles, and rebuild

Re: latex is driving me batty -- ! Package fontspec Error: The font "DejaVu Sans" cannot be found.

2019-09-12 Thread Ken Cunningham
Ah, I see this in the current `ghc` portfile. No doubt the solution: # fix DejaVu texlive fonts names, e.g. "\setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}" foreach f "\ ${srcpath}/${distname}/libraries/Cabal/Cabal/doc/conf.py \ ${srcpath}/${distname}/docs/users_guide/conf.py \ " { reinplace -E "s|(\{DejaVu\[\[:a

latex is driving me batty -- ! Package fontspec Error: The font "DejaVu Sans" cannot be found.

2019-09-12 Thread Ken Cunningham
I'm working on making a newer bootstrap version of ghc for SnowLeopard. The ghc 8.0.1 build finishes on 10.6.8, but it wants to build the PDF documentation next, and texlive is erroring building the PDF. I know nothing about texlive. I know I might turn off the docs, but -- it took many hours t

Re: [portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > One might wonder at the number of python version ports. I suspect a couple > of things that I don't know without a lot of digging would provide some > perspective: > * the OS version of python on the earliest OS MacPorts supports, and on each > subsequent OS vers

Re: [portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
One might wonder at the number of python version ports. I suspect a couple of things that I don't know without a lot of digging would provide some perspective: * the OS version of python on the earliest OS MacPorts supports, and on each subsequent OS version * the python versions specifically r

Re: [portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Christopher Jones wrote: > > Depends what you are thinking of by ‘officially support’. > > We have ports for > > python26 @2.6.9_7 (lang) > python27 @2.7.16_2 (lang) > > python32 @3.2.6_8 (lang) > python33 @3.3.7_3 (lang) > python34 @3.4.10_2 (lang) > python35 @3.5.7_1 (lang) > python36 @3.6

Re: [portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread Christopher Jones
Depends what you are thinking of by ‘officially support’. We have ports for python26 @2.6.9_7 (lang) An interpreted, object-oriented programming language python27 @2.7.16_2 (lang) An interpreted, object-oriented programming language python27-bootstrap @2.7.16_2 (lang) An interprete

[portgroups] Python

2019-09-12 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Which versions of Python do macports still officially support ?!? -- Bjarne D Mathiesen Korsør ; Danmark ; Europa -- denne besked er skrevet i et (næsten) M$-frit miljø MacOS X 10.13.6 High Sierra : 17" 2011 MacBook Pro ; 2.8G

Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 12, 2019, at 14:10, Chris Jones wrote: > It might be interesting to see exactly what cpu capabilities are support on > the build bots. Could you run > > sysctl -a | grep machdep.cpu.features > On them, and post what it gives ? Sure. Snow Leopard i386 FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE

Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-12 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, It might be interesting to see exactly what cpu capabilities are support on the build bots. Could you run sysctl -a | grep machdep.cpu.features On them, and post what it gives ? Chris > On 12 Sep 2019, at 7:46 pm, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > >> On Sep 9, 2019, at 02:32, Horst Simon wrote:

Re: [certbot,py-acme] Converting port to subport

2019-09-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 6, 2019, at 02:51, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: >> After adding these sub-ports to the certbot Portfile, disabling the old >> certbot-apache and certbot-nginx, and running portindex I get an error >> that the Portfile for certbot-apache cannot be found. port is still >> looking for the old

Re: Virtual Machines & Binary Compatibilty

2019-09-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 31, 2019, at 14:13, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Q : Will this scenario work ?!? > > If i create a VM of 10.6.8 in VirtualBox on my 2012 MacPro w/ Xeon CPUs, > can I then rsync my macports installation to a Core 2 Duo based Mac Mini > without any problems ?!? Some ports may detect optio

Re: Virtual Machines & Binary Compatibilty

2019-09-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 31, 2019, at 14:32, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > Also, for Snow Leopard, the OS license requires that OS and client both be OS > X Server, and virtualization software will probably enforce that regarding > the client (although by creating the right file in the image, it might be > pos

Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 9, 2019, at 02:32, Horst Simon wrote: > > I installed rspamd on macOS High Sierra Version 10.13.6, it build and > installed oh, but when starting rspamd it fails with illegal instruction 4:, > the same for rspamadm command. Anyone hs this successful running? > I noticed a couple rece