On 6 Mar 2017, at 23:29, Geoff Down wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 09:51 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
What Mac OS X version are you on?
>>> 10.4.11 .That's also why I can't access Trac via Github.
>>
>> IIRC macports uses libcurl linked agains
> On 7 Mar 2017, at 14:32, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 17:07, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... Still busted here (Australia) so it's either regional or local.
>
> In Australia you should be using your local Australian mirror (aarnet) anyway
> for better performance:
>
> h
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 15:06, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> How again would one be able to search the ports to find which one might
> install the Qt "user interface compiler" named "uic"? The wiki doesn't seem
> to have any help on this, but I thought it had been
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 15:44, Geoff Down wrote:
>
> Feel free to change the subject btw - no threading here.
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 09:37 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
>>> I get a Cert error at that point:
>>
>> so, that's the actual problem.
>>
>>
On Mar 6, 2017, at 17:07, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Hmmm... Still busted here (Australia) so it's either regional or local.
In Australia you should be using your local Australian mirror (aarnet) anyway
for better performance:
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Mirrors
On 07/03/2017, at 10:07 AM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> it's working for me right now.
>
> Hmmm... Still busted here (Australia) so it's either regional or local.
>
> Any other Aussies on the list?
Seems to be working for me --- in Melbourne.
Ian W.
Tara
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Peter West wrote:
> Just did a selfupdate. 9:30am AEST.
Thanks; that nails it to my back yard, then :-(
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> it's working for me right now.
Hmmm... Still busted here (Australia) so it's either regional or local.
Any other Aussies on the list?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 09:51 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
> >> What Mac OS X version are you on?
> > 10.4.11 .That's also why I can't access Trac via Github.
>
> IIRC macports uses libcurl linked against system openssl - so you're
> going to see this
On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
>> What Mac OS X version are you on?
> 10.4.11 .That's also why I can't access Trac via Github.
IIRC macports uses libcurl linked against system openssl - so you're going to
see this more and more often (as current security recommendations require
s
Feel free to change the subject btw - no threading here.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 09:37 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
> > I get a Cert error at that point:
>
> so, that's the actual problem.
>
> What Mac OS X version are you on?
10.4.11 .That's also wh
On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
> I get a Cert error at that point:
> ---> Attempting to fetch ntp-4.2.8p9.tar.gz from
> http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-4.2/
> % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time
> Current
>
On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> ozzie:~ [16]# port -v selfupdate
> ---> Updating MacPorts base sources using rsync
> rsync: failed to connect to rsync.macports.org: Operation timed out (60)
> rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at
> /BuildRoot/Library/Caches/com.apple
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 08:35 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> even if it's not being mirrored, you should be able to fetch it from the
> source - here's what happens if I try now:
>
> % sudo port clean --all ntp
> ---> Cleaning ntp
> % sudo port -dv fetch ntp
...
> ---> Attempting to fetch ntp-4.2
ozzie:~ [16]# port -v selfupdate
---> Updating MacPorts base sources using rsync
rsync: failed to connect to rsync.macports.org: Operation timed out (60)
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at
/BuildRoot/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/rsync/rsync-51/rsync/clientserver.c(106)
[rece
Hello,
How again would one be able to search the ports to find which one might install
the Qt "user interface compiler" named "uic"? The wiki doesn't seem to have any
help on this, but I thought it had been discussed previously on this
reflector...
Smith
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryp
On Mar 6, 2017, at 3:31 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
> thanks for replying. Ports tries to install 4.2.8p9 and exits when it
> can't find the distfile:
> ---> Fetching distfiles for ntp
> ---> Attempting to fetch ntp-4.2.8p9.tar.gz from
> http://distfiles.macports.org/ntp
> ...other mirrors
> ---> Att
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 08:09 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
> > If anyone involved with the ntp port is listening,
>
> um, you mean me?
>
> (hint, maintainers are listed when you do `port info portname`)
>
> > ntp-4.2.8p9.tar.gz
> > has disappeared
On Mar 6, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
> If anyone involved with the ntp port is listening,
um, you mean me?
(hint, maintainers are listed when you do `port info portname`)
> ntp-4.2.8p9.tar.gz
> has disappeared from the macports site and the mirrors.
you mean the distfile (or binary) i
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
> has the access to Trac changed? I don't recall Github being involved
> before. Will my old login creds work ?(it seems not, but I may have
> forgottent which password).
>
Apple shut down MacOSForge, the whole infrastructure changed as a result
Hello all,
has the access to Trac changed? I don't recall Github being involved
before. Will my old login creds work ?(it seems not, but I may have
forgottent which password).
If anyone involved with the ntp port is listening, ntp-4.2.8p9.tar.gz
has disappeared from the macports site and the mirr
On Mar 6, 2017, at 09:33, db wrote:
>
> I would expect some output without verbose flag like
>
> $ port livecheck [port]
> [port] seems to be up to date
>
> Not worth a feature request, I guess.
I'm pretty sure it's intentional that, like many other unix commands, no output
is meant to signify
I would expect some output without verbose flag like
$ port livecheck [port]
[port] seems to be up to date
Not worth a feature request, I guess.
On 6 Mar 2017, at 15:05, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 08:03, db wrote:
>>
>> I meant try with other ports, e.g., emacs
>>
>> $ port li
On Mar 6, 2017, at 08:03, db wrote:
>
> I meant try with other ports, e.g., emacs
>
> $ port livecheck emacs
> $
> $ port -v livecheck emacs
> emacs seems to be up to date
>
> Not all ports give the same output with livecheck without -v.
Ah, I see. Yes, when non-verbose output is empty, it's
I meant try with other ports, e.g., emacs
$ port livecheck emacs
$
$ port -v livecheck emacs
emacs seems to be up to date
Not all ports give the same output with livecheck without -v.
On 6 Mar 2017, at 14:54, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 07:53, db wrote:
>
>> Try with emacs.
>
>
On Mar 6, 2017, at 07:53, db wrote:
> Try with emacs.
Sorry, I've never used emacs.
Try with emacs.
On 6 Mar 2017, at 14:47, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 07:44, db wrote:
>
>> Do you know of any means that I'm not aware of to make livecheck output its
>> result without -v?
>
>
> There doesn't seem to be any difference in livecheck output when using the
> verbos
On Mar 6, 2017, at 07:44, db wrote:
> Do you know of any means that I'm not aware of to make livecheck output its
> result without -v?
There doesn't seem to be any difference in livecheck output when using the
verbose flag:
$ port livecheck gcc7
gcc7 seems to have been updated (port version:
Do you know of any means that I'm not aware of to make livecheck output its
result without -v?
On 6 Mar 2017, at 13:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 03:46, db wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to enable verbose output _after_ entering shell mode with
>> `port`? I'd rather not use
> On Mar 5, 2017, at 11:59, Comer Duncan wrote:
>
> I have had a failure to complete an update using a script that I have used
> for quite a while. I attach the script and the end part of the main.log. Can
> someone please take a look and offer some likely cause(s)?
>
> Thanks very much.
>
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 03:46, db wrote:
>
> Is there any way to enable verbose output _after_ entering shell mode with
> `port`? I'd rather not use `port -v`, then I get it unnecessarily for all
> commands.
Not that I know of.
Is there any way to enable verbose output _after_ entering shell mode with
`port`? I'd rather not use `port -v`, then I get it unnecessarily for all
commands.
> On 6 Mar 2017, at 09:53, Chris Jones wrote:
>
>
> Building statically is also a security nightmare.
>
> If I have a dynamic libFoo.so, that a lot of other libraries and applications
> dynamically link against, that is suddenly found to have a major security
> bug, then once libFoo.so is up
b.t.w. gcc 4.8 is quite old now. If you have any ports installed using
this gcc version, as a variant, you should check to see if the defaults
for that port have been updated to a newer release (gcc 6) and where
necessary switch to using that.
On 06/03/17 08:46, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi,
You
Building statically is also a security nightmare.
If I have a dynamic libFoo.so, that a lot of other libraries and
applications dynamically link against, that is suddenly found to have a
major security bug, then once libFoo.so is updated I know everything
else using it is also fixed. If inste
Hi,
You haven't really provided any useful information that anyone can use
to help. For instance the last line of the log you posted says
:debug:build "$procedure $targetname"
:error:build See
/opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_por
36 matches
Mail list logo
