On 27 February 2017 at 22:46, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Seems that gcc6-6.3.0_2.darwin_10.x86_64.tbz2 was not pre-built; is that an
> error, or intentional?
According to Ryan the VMs running 10.6 and 10.8 are currently down
after power outage and at least one of them needs some more work to
br
Seems that gcc6-6.3.0_2.darwin_10.x86_64.tbz2 was not pre-built; is that an
error, or intentional?
On 27 Feb 2017, at 20:48, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> What files are you referring to?
> Are you claiming that something new is using up 1GB of space?
Starting with 4.8 GB MacPorts prefix, I changed the source to using git and
upgraded to 2.4.1 via `port` — it went up to 5.9, from which I deleted .35
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 12:52, db wrote:
>
> What about unnecessary files from the upgrade to 2.4.1 using `port`?
What files are you referring to?
> Up until now I always used the package, which had the consequence of writing
> my profile, but at least it never increased the prefix size by 1 GB
What about unnecessary files from the upgrade to 2.4.1 using `port`? Up until
now I always used the package, which had the consequence of writing my profile,
but at least it never increased the prefix size by 1 GB.
On 27 Feb 2017, at 19:16, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 05:08, d
On Feb 27, 2017, at 05:08, db wrote:
> I changed the source to git. Can I safely delete the rsync tarball and
> related files at /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/ ?
Sure.
> I also upgraded to 2.4.1 using `port`. Are there any files remaining from it
> that could/should be d
I changed the source to git. Can I safely delete the rsync tarball and related
files at /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/ ?
I also upgraded to 2.4.1 using `port`. Are there any files remaining from it
that could/should be deleted? I noticed that this is still using rsync.
On 27 February 2017 at 11:07, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> I just figured out that k3dsurf depends on qt3-mac which doesn't
> compile on > 10.6, but one can still install qt3 and compile k3dsurf
> against qt3. That one uses X11, so it won't look nice, but that's
> still better than nothing.
I just tr
On 27 February 2017 at 09:49, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> - On 10.11: edit the Portfile for k3dsurf and replace dependency on
> qt3-mac with qt4-mac, check if that compiles. If k3dsurf doesn't work
> with Qt 4 (which is possible, the last release seems to be from
> 2007/2009), there's no hope for thi
On 27 February 2017 at 04:43, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2017, at 18:05 , Christopher Stone wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 2017, at 19:57, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>> Now, "port info" denies any knowledge of the port.
>>
>> Hey Justin,
>>
>> Try search instead of info:
>>
>> port search "surf"
For
10 matches
Mail list logo
