Both should be there
port contents coreutils | grep stdb # bins are prefixed with g
port contents expect | grep unbuffer
On 31 Jan 2017, at 05:27, Michael wrote:
> So I wanted to linebuffer a program that is feeding into a pipe.
>
> Looking around with Google, I found two solutions:
> 1, unbuf
On 31 Jan 2017, at 06:47, Michael wrote:
> Nope, /usr/bin. Which package installs script?
util-linux
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Michael wrote:
> (beware if you have installed a version of script(1) via macports, its
> usage may differ!)
>
>
> Nope, /usr/bin. Which package installs script?
I don't know of one off the top of my head, but there's enough packages in
MacPorts that I wouldn't
On 2017-01-30, at 9:44 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> Both of these programs rely on APIs that only exist in GNU glibc, not BSD
> libc or OS X libSystem.
>
> There are sometimes hacky ways around this.
>
> ssh -tt localhost the_com
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Brandon Allbery
wrote:
> Both of these programs rely on APIs that only exist in GNU glibc, not BSD
> libc or OS X libSystem.
>
There are sometimes hacky ways around this.
ssh -tt localhost the_command_that_buffers here | ...
or
script -a /dev/null the
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Michael wrote:
> So I wanted to linebuffer a program that is feeding into a pipe.
>
> Looking around with Google, I found two solutions:
> 1, unbuffer, from expect, or
> 2, stdbuf, from the gnu core utils.
>
> I've got expect 5.45. I've got core utils. I don't se
So I wanted to linebuffer a program that is feeding into a pipe.
Looking around with Google, I found two solutions:
1, unbuffer, from expect, or
2, stdbuf, from the gnu core utils.
I've got expect 5.45. I've got core utils. I don't seem to have either.
Help please?
---
Entertaining minecraft vi
I ran 'port diagnose' and I think there's an issue with how it handles symlinks.
Specifically:
> Checking for file '/opt/local/libexec/texlive/binaries/a2ping' on disk...
> [FAILED]
> Checking for file '/opt/local/libexec/texlive/binaries/a5toa4' on disk...
> [FAILED]
> Checking for file '/opt/
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:37:41PM +, Barry Scott wrote:
> > On 30 Jan 2017, at 12:44, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> > When I run the postinstall as me it works are intended for my
> > .bash_profile. When I run via sudo it looks at root’s file and
> > states tit does not support the “sh” shel
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 12:44, Barry Scott wrote:
>
> When I run the postinstall as me it works are intended for my .bash_profile.
> When I run via sudo it looks at root’s file and states tit does not support
> the
> “sh” shell. I suspect that the environment that postinstall is running in is a
>
When I run the postinstall as me it works are intended for my .bash_profile.
When I run via sudo it looks at root’s file and states tit does not support the
“sh” shell. I suspect that the environment that postinstall is running in is a
strange in some way. (I have seen Mac specific oddities when de
11 matches
Mail list logo
