Re: Inkscape 0.92.0 now available on MacPorts

Eneko: Many of your issues have already been addressed but since there were some misunderstandings at one point or another, I'll attempt to answer more clearly: On 1/5/17 2:41 PM, Eneko Gotzon wrote: > ​Hi all Byte Riders… :)​ > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:32 AM, David Evans

Re: Inkscape 0.92.0 now available on MacPorts

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > "Quartz" is not "XQuartz" ​Thank you for your knowledge & time, Brandon.​ ​Good live. -- Eneko Gotzon Ares enekogot...@gmail.com

Re: PowerMac download statistics?

Hi, On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 04:48:37PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I'm looking for statistics on the number of Macports users and the > number of PowerMac users. > > Does MacPorts track the statistics? If so, are they publicly > available? I think portmgr@ has access to our CDN's statistics,

Re: PowerMac download statistics?

>> I'm looking for statistics on the number of Macports users and the >> number of PowerMac users. >> >> Does MacPorts track the statistics? > > No, unless you run "sudo port install mpstats" which is not even advertized. > >> If so, are they publicly available? > > There is some (useless) statisti

Re: PowerMac download statistics?

On 6 January 2017 at 22:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I'm looking for statistics on the number of Macports users and the > number of PowerMac users. > > Does MacPorts track the statistics? No, unless you run "sudo port install mpstats" which is not even advertized. > If so, are the

PowerMac download statistics?

Hi Everyone, I'm looking for statistics on the number of Macports users and the number of PowerMac users. Does MacPorts track the statistics? If so, are they publicly available? Thanks in advance.

Re: Migration issue

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > But, this list is from the old machine. My question is why the new > machine ended up with a lot more +universal. Actually, I'm starting to wonder if there is a general option leakage issue of late (compare the discussion about archive_

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Russell Jones > wrote: > > On 06/01/17 14:28, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >> > On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Russell Jones >> > wrote: >> > >> > On 06/01/17 13:22, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:20 AM,

Re: Inkscape 0.92.0 now available on MacPorts

"Quartz" is not "XQuartz", is the point. XQuartz is X11. Quartz is the old name for the native OS X 2D graphics API, still used for consistency. If you tell me you don't want to use X11 but you want XQuartz, you're telling me you want X11 instead of X11 (huh?). (X11 is *not* native. OS X graphics

Grass wxGUI

Now that I have successfully installed Grass 7.2, I am wondering why I didn’t get the wxGUI with it. ○ → grass72 Starting GRASS GIS... ERROR: wxGUI requires wxPython. No module named wxversion ERROR: Error in GUI startup. See messages above (if any) and if necessary, please report this error to

Re: Inkscape 0.92.0 now available on MacPorts

Hi Brandon, thank you for take time to answer my question On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > > XQuartz = X server under Quartz = X11 for OS X. > I think I understand your statement. > So you *have* it for XQuartz. Do you mean you want it native instead? > I am a littl

Re: Migration issue

On 06/01/17 14:28, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Russell Jones wrote: > > On 06/01/17 13:22, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 09:26, Adam Dershowitz wrote: I just tried what you suggested for py27-

Re: pan - start with script.app at the new Pan 0.141

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 6:17 AM, FritzS - gmx wrote: > > Now with only > do shell script "export PATH=\"/opt/local/bin:$PATH\" && pan“ > it works well. > > PS: I am not a script guru - but now I understand this script line. Apple has a comprehensive primer on shell scripting: https://developer.ap

Re: Migration issue

On 06/01/17 13:22, Adam Dershowitz wrote: On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 5, 2017, at 09:26, Adam Dershowitz wrote: I just tried what you suggested for py27-numpy and it just activated without any error. Yes, there will not be an error at activation time. However, if y

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > >> On Jan 5, 2017, at 09:26, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> I just tried what you suggested for py27-numpy and it just activated without >> any error. > > Yes, there will not be an error at activation time. However, if you have > anythi

Re: Looking for mailing list advice

Hello Dave, We use mailman setup a a broadcast only list-serv for big mailings and we design them using http://equinux.com/us/products/maildesigner2/mail-designer-pro-3/ We also use mail designer pro to send small batches of email. It uses the users Mail.app to send and receive messages but

Re: pan - start with script.app at the new Pan 0.141

> Am 06.01.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Ryan Schmidt : > > On Jan 6, 2017, at 03:16, FritzS - gmx wrote: >> >> My script pan.app >> do shell script "export PATH=\"/opt/local/bin:$PATH\" && pan" >> do shell script "/opt/local/bin/pan“ >> works now (without set the path in script it does’t run too) >> >

Re: pan - start with script.app at the new Pan 0.141

On Jan 6, 2017, at 03:16, FritzS - gmx wrote: > > My script pan.app > do shell script "export PATH=\"/opt/local/bin:$PATH\" && pan" > do shell script "/opt/local/bin/pan“ > works now (without set the path in script it does’t run too) > > Pan 0.141 runs now well - but if I closed pan another error

Re: pan - start with script.app at the new Pan 0.141

> Am 06.01.2017 um 08:12 schrieb Ryan Schmidt : > > >> On Jan 5, 2017, at 07:26, FritzS - gmx wrote: >> >> Till today I start pan with a script saved as pan.app >> do shell script "/opt/local/bin/pan“ >> >> this worked well till the update to Pan 0.141 coming out now. >> >> Now it comes the

Re: gmp's archive_site in Portfile disables custom archive_sites

> On 5 Jan 2017, at 23:16, Christopher Jones wrote: > [..] > One last question, just a thought, but what exactly are you aiming to gain > from this setup ? most ports have binaries available direct from macports. I > have multiple machines and have never really had any issues with just letting