On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> No, I'm talking about something that was planned for 2.3.4, and got told
> something like "next version", so it sounds relevant to me...
>
They are planned for 2.4, not any release in the 2.3 series. 2.4 is not yet
usable for non-developers
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> > What do you mean? What builds? What comments?
>
> I think he means aggregation of port notes.
Yes, those... I'd forgotten the precise term.
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > Now, not to sound critical or anything, but when are we going to see
> > the various comments generated for various builds summarised at the
> > end?
>
> What do you mean? What builds? What comments?
The comments that appear after some installs (OK,
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Nov 17, 2016, at 16:43, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>>
>> Now, not to sound critical or anything, but when are we going to see the
>> various comments generated for various builds summarised at the end?
>
> What do you mean? What builds? Wha
On Nov 17, 2016, at 16:43, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> Now, not to sound critical or anything, but when are we going to see the
> various comments generated for various builds summarised at the end?
What do you mean? What builds? What comments?
Are you taking about the formatting and content of t
Good work!
Now, not to sound critical or anything, but when are we going to see the
various comments generated for various builds summarised at the end?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
The MacPorts Project is pleased to announce the release of version
2.3.5. This is a bugfix release with small changes only, but the first
we cut from our new home at GitHub. See the ChangeLog [1] for the list
of changes.
If you already have MacPorts installed, the preferred method for
updating is
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 12:09, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> The only thing that could be done would be a slight delay between
>> master and "stable". For example everything that's in master would go
>> to "quasi-stable" after a week unless some
