Re: Migration from Mavericks to El Capitan failed

Mon, 10 Oct 2016 01:55:18 -0700, list_em...@icloud.com wrote > I?m trying to upgrade MacPorts after upgrading my OS from Mavericks to El > Capitan. (My computer is too old for Sierra.) I followed the migration > instructions at https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration but the process > related t

Re: Migration from Mavericks to El Capitan failed

> On Oct 10, 2016, at 6:01 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > >> On Oct 10, 2016, at 3:55 AM, list_em...@icloud.com wrote: >> >> I’m trying to upgrade MacPorts after upgrading my OS from Mavericks to El >> Capitan. (My computer is too old for Sierra.) I followed the migration >> instructions at htt

Re: Migration from Mavericks to El Capitan failed

> On Oct 10, 2016, at 3:55 AM, list_em...@icloud.com wrote: > > I’m trying to upgrade MacPorts after upgrading my OS from Mavericks to El > Capitan. (My computer is too old for Sierra.) I followed the migration > instructions at https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration but the process > relate

Re: Migration of MacPorts installation: Very basic questions

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > your assumptions are correct. ​Thank you very much Rain​er. -- Eneko Gotzon Ares enekogot...@gmail.com ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosfo

Re: Migration of MacPorts installation: Very basic questions

On 09/26/2016 11:49 PM, Eneko Gotzon wrote: > In the /Download and execute the restore_ports script/ section (Migration > procedure of a MacPorts installation > ), please, how > many > commands are in the provided expression, three? > >

Re: Migration conflicting ports

So the problem was that fltk wasn’t building in 10.11? When I recently upgraded, it built fine, but the conflict was octave requiring -devel while gmsh didn’t. I had ended up force deactivating fltk (after installing gmsh) then installing octave and fltk-devel. That seemed to be working tempo

Re: Migration conflicting ports

Just built & works for me too (actual testing inside octave), so I committed the fix in r143912. Thanks for pointing out that issue! - MLD On Thu, Dec 24, 2015, at 06:55 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Dec 24, 2015, at 6:01 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > > On 23 December 2015 at 16:12, Adam Dersho

Re: Migration conflicting ports

On Dec 24, 2015, at 6:01 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 23 December 2015 at 16:12, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> Before I upgraded to OS 10.11 I had the gmsh and octave ports installed. >> Both depended on fltk. I am now reinstalling my ports per the migration >> instructions. The problem is tha

Re: Migration conflicting ports

On 23 December 2015 at 16:12, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > Before I upgraded to OS 10.11 I had the gmsh and octave ports installed. > Both depended on fltk. I am now reinstalling my ports per the migration > instructions. The problem is that octave now depends on fltk-devel while > gmsh depends o

Re: Migration issue

On Dec 16, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Oh, this reminded me on the following thread from the past: >https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2013-July/023498.html > > Ryan, does the following patch help? > > --- Portfile (revision 143624) > +++ Portfile (working cop

Re: Migration issue

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > Hi, > > On 16 December 2015 at 23:33, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> On 16 December 2015 at 21:50, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Dear Adam, On 16 December 2015 at 17:34, Adam

Re: Migration issue

Hi, On 16 December 2015 at 23:33, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 16 December 2015 at 21:50, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> >>> Dear Adam, >>> >>> On 16 December 2015 at 17:34, Adam Dershowitz wrote: I did a selfupdate. I uninstalled per5, perl5.16

Re: Migration issue

On 16 December 2015 at 21:50, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> Dear Adam, >> >> On 16 December 2015 at 17:34, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >>> I did a selfupdate. I uninstalled per5, perl5.16 and perl5.22 >>> Next, I installed perl5 +perl5_16 >>> Next I in

Re: Migration issue

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > Does the restore_ports.tcl script handle things any differently then just > a standard install or upgrade? For example, does it handle the order of > installs differently? It remembers active variants, so if you had perl5 +perl5_16 inst

Re: Migration issue

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Ryan Schmidt > wrote: > > However, that doesn't explain why, for me, the same is not happening in the > post-destroot phase. > > Seems like it might be for some peop

Re: Migration issue

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > However, that doesn't explain why, for me, the same is not happening in > the post-destroot phase. Seems like it might be for some people though? That would explain why some people are reporting that a -5.22 suffixed name is being used by

Re: Migration issue

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > > I was reaching to make sense of it all, because currently the situation is I > upgraded to 10.11 so I removed all my ports, and now can’t get many of my > ports reinstalled because perl seems critical to a bunch of other ports, and > wa

Re: Migration issue

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > Dear Adam, > > On 16 December 2015 at 17:34, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> I did a selfupdate. I uninstalled per5, perl5.16 and perl5.22 >> Next, I installed perl5 +perl5_16 >> Next I installed perl5.16 +universal >> >> Then I did 5.22 and

Re: Migration issue

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > >> On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> Is the problem with perl5 +perl5_16 ? Since that is version 5.22.1? Should I not have installed that? >>> >>> If perl5 +perl5_16 installs version 5.22.1 for you, that c

Re: Migration issue

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > >>> Is the problem with perl5 +perl5_16 ? Since that is version 5.22.1? >>> Should I not have installed that? >> >> If perl5 +perl5_16 installs version 5.22.1 for you, that certainly >> shouldn't have happened. > > Sorry I wasn’t clear.

Re: Migration issue

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > Sorry I wasn’t clear. I just meant that I perl5 shows this: > perl5 @5.22.1_0+perl5_16 (active) > > So, it is version 5.22 But, it ddid install 5_16. > That's confusing but expected; the version is the latest version it knows about (II

Re: Migration issue

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > Dear Adam, > > On 16 December 2015 at 17:34, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> I did a selfupdate. I uninstalled per5, perl5.16 and perl5.22 >> Next, I installed perl5 +perl5_16 >> Next I installed perl5.16 +universal >> >> Then I did 5.22 and

Re: Migration issue

Dear Adam, On 16 December 2015 at 17:34, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > I did a selfupdate. I uninstalled per5, perl5.16 and perl5.22 > Next, I installed perl5 +perl5_16 > Next I installed perl5.16 +universal > > Then I did 5.22 and had the problem again: > > sudo port install perl5.22 +universal > --

Re: Migration issue

I did a selfupdate. I uninstalled per5, perl5.16 and perl5.22 Next, I installed perl5 +perl5_16 Next I installed perl5.16 +universal Then I did 5.22 and had the problem again: sudo port install perl5.22 +universal ---> Computing dependencies for perl5.22 ---> Fetching archive for perl5.22 ---

Re: Migration issue

Thanks, I had not done a self update since I started to build things last night, so it is possible that I happened to get that bad spot 14 hours ago. I will try to do that, and then manually deal with perl, and see what happens. > On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Mojca Miklavec > wrote: > > De

Re: Migration issue

Dear Adam, Your setup contains some mixture of universal and non-universal ports that seems to be interfering. Add to that the fact that if you would install some ports from scratch now, you would get the +perl5_22 variant, while you probably installed +perl5_16 in the past. And an upgrade would

Re: Migration issue

I did just finally force activated both perl5.16 and 5.22. But, it did let the restore_ports.tcl script continue to install other things. I’m not sure if this is a good idea at all? It gives a bunch of errors for perl libraries as it is going, so I doubt that anything that uses them will funct

Re: migration web page offline

On Oct 21, 2015, at 11:46 AM, João Garcia wrote: > Good afternoon, > > I'm trying to install valgrind on Mac OS X where I have recently updated to > the latest OS, El Capitan. I tried to install MacPorts but I already had it > so I clicked on the link that explained how to migrate it but the l

Re: Migration instruction site is down

Both links work just fine for me... must be your end. On 21/10/15 08:15, Ryan Crocker wrote: neither of those links are working. I just get the beachball and nothing happens. I’ve tried on two different routers, computers and my phone. Though the text version of: http://webcache.googleuserco

Re: Migration instruction site is down

neither of those links are working. I just get the beachball and nothing happens. I’ve tried on two different routers, computers and my phone. Though the text version of: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration&strip=1&vwsrc=0

Re: Migration instruction site is down

On 10/21/2015 01:26 AM, Ryan Crocker wrote: > I just switched to El Captain and I wanted to migrate macports over to that > OS. > I tried: > > https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration > > but that site is down. Does anyone have the instructions or another site > where > they are posted. Sor

Re: Migration info page

Try looking at the web archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20150910195851/http://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration On 11 Oct 2015 23:00, Ignatios Athanasiadis wrote: > > > Dear all, > > I have switched from Lion 10.7 to El Capitan 10.11 yesterday. > I know that since I have upgraded my OS I sho

Re: migration question

On Apr 11, 2015, at 8:46 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Saturday April 11 2015 06:27:21 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> Unless you plan to meticulously analyze each port's build script, you won't >> know whether that build script makes > > It's not like it's difficult to search for os.platform and/

Re: migration question

On Saturday April 11 2015 06:27:21 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Unless you plan to meticulously analyze each port's build script, you won't > know whether that build script makes It's not like it's difficult to search for os.platform and/or os.major ... and of course it would be the 1st thing to check

Re: migration question

On Apr 11, 2015, at 5:54 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Saturday April 11 2015 05:27:36 Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> it can work; it's what I did. Software built on 10.9 largely works fine on >> 10.10, so you can still use most of your old ports until you rebuild them. I >> still have a few por

Re: migration question

On Saturday April 11 2015 05:27:36 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >it can work; it's what I did. Software built on 10.9 largely works fine on >10.10, so you can still use most of your old ports until you rebuild them. I >still have a few ports installed on 10.10 that were built for 10.9 -- mostly >t

Re: migration question

On Apr 11, 2015, at 5:13 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Friday April 10 2015 17:28:24 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> If you use default prefix, and use default variants for most ports, you'll >> get binaries for many of them, so if your internet connection is reasonably >> fast, > > I have wine i

Re: migration question

On Friday April 10 2015 17:28:24 Ryan Schmidt wrote: >If you use default prefix, and use default variants for most ports, you'll get >binaries for many of them, so if your internet connection is reasonably fast, I have wine installed, which means I get a load of universal variants that I wo

Re: migration question

On Apr 10, 2015, at 12:44 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > The issue around the root backdoor has me re-evaluating how much longer I'm > going to postpone upgrading. One thing that's certainly not helping is the > time I know I'll spend rebuilding all of my ports if I do things the official > way

Re: Migration questions

On 6/13/14, 10:16 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: If you’ve time/bandwidth, just go ahead and reinstall everything. On Jun 13, 2014, at 22:06, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Hmm. Maybe rebuilding would help. The dependencies you got from our binary packages would hopefully not need to be rebuilt. Although w

Re: Migration questions

If you’ve time/bandwidth, just go ahead and reinstall everything. On Jun 13, 2014, at 22:06, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Hmm. Maybe rebuilding would help. The dependencies you got from our binary > packages would hopefully not need to be rebuilt. Although we cannot check > which of your ports were i

Re: Migration questions

On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Stephen Langer wrote: > On 6/13/14, 4:55 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Stephen Langer wrote: >> >>> I upgraded my Mac at work from 10.7 to 10.9 yesterday. Xcode was still >>> being downloaded when I left in the evening. When I got

Re: Migration questions

On 6/13/14, 4:55 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Stephen Langer wrote: I upgraded my Mac at work from 10.7 to 10.9 yesterday. Xcode was still being downloaded when I left in the evening. When I got home I downloaded and installed macports using the migration instruct

Re: Migration questions

On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Stephen Langer wrote: > I upgraded my Mac at work from 10.7 to 10.9 yesterday. Xcode was still being > downloaded when I left in the evening. When I got home I downloaded and > installed macports using the migration instructions, except that I installed > it us

Re: Migration question and binary question

On 2014-5-10 00:03 , Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Joshua Root > wrote: > > Handling variants of dependencies correctly is precisely why > restore_ports.tcl exists. The lack of automatic preservation of the > requested flag is an an

Re: Migration question and binary question

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > Handling variants of dependencies correctly is precisely why > restore_ports.tcl exists. The lack of automatic preservation of the > requested flag is an annoyance, certainly, but you can get around it by > running this at the same time you gen

Re: Migration question and binary question

On May 9, 2014, at 02:22, Jerry wrote: > On May 8, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > >> Jerry wrote: >>> I am considering using the "Automatically reinstall ports" suggestion >>> whereby a script is downloaded which script then works with a previously >>> saved myports.txt. If I do this,

Re: Migration question and binary question

On May 8, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > Jerry wrote: >> I am considering using the "Automatically reinstall ports" suggestion >> whereby a script is downloaded which script then works with a previously >> saved myports.txt. If I do this, will the script install old versions of >> po

Re: Migration question and binary question

Jerry wrote: > I am considering using the "Automatically reinstall ports" suggestion whereby > a script is downloaded which script then works with a previously saved > myports.txt. If I do this, will the script install old versions of ports > which had not been active? I'm thinking that this mig

Re: Migration question and binary question

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Jerry wrote: > I redirected this output to .txt files. Do you have a quick way (script) > to use these echoed files during reinstallation? I don't need to do it often enough to script it, I generally build it on the fly :) port echo active and requested | pe

Re: Migration question and binary question

On May 8, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Jerry wrote: > I just upgraded my OS to 10.9 from 10.8 and am following the instructions for > migrating MacPorts at https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration. > > I am considering using the "Automatically rei

Re: Migration question and binary question

On May 8, 2014, at 16:35, Jerry wrote: > I just upgraded my OS to 10.9 from 10.8 and am following the instructions for > migrating MacPorts at https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration. > > I am considering using the "Automatically reinstall ports" suggestion whereby > a script is downloaded wh

Re: Migration question and binary question

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Jerry wrote: > I just upgraded my OS to 10.9 from 10.8 and am following the instructions > for migrating MacPorts at https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration. > > I am considering using the "Automatically reinstall ports" suggestion > whereby a script is downloaded

Re: Migration wiki page

> Should the instructions say to uninstall ports before doing any > upgrading, in case the upgrade breaks macports? Worth a shot; realistically, someone should have had access to Xcode 4.3 prior to its launch and could have addressed this issue. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic sign

Re: Migration wiki page

Should the instructions say to uninstall ports before doing any upgrading, in case the upgrade breaks macports? Scott On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 17, 2012, at 17:26, Jacob Schwartz wrote: > >>> The migration instructions do have you uninstall and reinstall all

Re: Migration wiki page

On Feb 17, 2012, at 17:26, Jacob Schwartz wrote: >> The migration instructions do have you uninstall and reinstall all ports. > > Yes, I wasn't saying that they were functionally different. I was > saying that the time to get to the same result was orders of magnitude > faster. The uninstall c

Re: Migration wiki page

On Feb 17, 2012, at 16:51, Jacob Schwartz wrote: >> Please do not install anything in /usr/local as it will probably interfere >> with MacPorts. > > Oh? How is that? Compilers look in /usr/local for software and often use it in preference to versions installed by MacPorts, leading to problem

Re: Migration wiki page

> Note that not all of MacPorts is necessarily confined to /opt/local. > The uninstall instructions show all of the locations standard ports > and MacPorts itself might install things into: > > http://guide.macports.org/chunked/installing.macports.uninstalling.html Hrm, thanks. > The migration in

Re: Migration wiki page

On Feb 17, 2012, at 16:31, Jacob Schwartz wrote: >> First question: did you rebuild everything first? >> http://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration > > I upgraded to Lion recently and I used this webpage, since it's been > mentioned several times here. But after spending a lot of time on > this (a

Re: migration

On 28 Oct 2008, at 11:34, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Oct 27, 2008, at 22:10, Михаил А wrote: You disable Apple's Apache and PHP by going to Apple Menu > System Preferences > Sharing > Personal Web Sharing and turning it off. Apple doesn't provide MySQL on Mac OS X. They do on Mac OS X Server.

Re: migration

On Oct 27, 2008, at 22:10, Михаил А wrote: You disable Apple's Apache and PHP by going to Apple Menu > System Preferences > Sharing > Personal Web Sharing and turning it off. Apple doesn't provide MySQL on Mac OS X. They do on Mac OS X Server. If you're on Mac OS X Server, you would turn of

Re: migration

Михаил А [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 28 Oct 2008, at 10:36, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Oct 27, 2008, at 20:55, Михаил А wrote: On 28 Oct 2008, at 09:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Oct 27, 2008, at 20:23, Михаил А wrote: I have installed PHP+Mysql from from source. But I intend to go to the MacPorts

Re: migration

On Oct 27, 2008, at 20:55, Михаил А wrote: On 28 Oct 2008, at 09:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Oct 27, 2008, at 20:23, Михаил А wrote: I have installed PHP+Mysql from from source. But I intend to go to the MacPorts . What should I do with the PHP+Mysql installed from source. Disable, uninstal

Re: migration

On Oct 27, 2008, at 20:23, Михаил А wrote: I have installed PHP+Mysql from from source. But I intend to go to the MacPorts . What should I do with the PHP+Mysql installed from source. Disable, uninstall or delete? Whatever you like. MacPorts is self-contained so it shouldn't interfere with