On Jun 3, 2008, at 2:10 AM, Alakazam wrote:
>>> - What version of Mac OS X are you running ?
>> 10.5.11
>
> Is that 10.4.11 or 10.5.3 ? Anyway, this obviously does not change
> anything, since we obtain similar results on the performance tests.
Oops. 10.4.11.
>
>
> I think it would be best t
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Alakazam wrote:
> >> - What machine are you running octave on ?
> > PPC Powerbook 1.5 GHz 2 GB
>
> Which explains why plotting takes ~20s for you, and ~10s for me.
>
> >> - What version of Mac OS X are you running ?
> > 10.5.11
>
> Is that 10.4.11 or
>> - What machine are you running octave on ?
> PPC Powerbook 1.5 GHz 2 GB
Which explains why plotting takes ~20s for you, and ~10s for me.
>> - What version of Mac OS X are you running ?
> 10.5.11
Is that 10.4.11 or 10.5.3 ? Anyway, this obviously does not change
anything, since we obtain
On May 31, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Alakazam wrote:
> Hi !
>
> On 30 mai 08, at 06:41, Jerry wrote:
>
>> I noticed that plotting with the new Octave version 3.0.1 on Macports
>> is very slow compared to older versions of Octave, e.g. 2.1.71. In
>> the old Octave, small plots appear instantaneously, prob
Hi !
On 30 mai 08, at 06:41, Jerry wrote:
> I noticed that plotting with the new Octave version 3.0.1 on Macports
> is very slow compared to older versions of Octave, e.g. 2.1.71. In
> the old Octave, small plots appear instantaneously, probably before
> the Return key hits its stop. In Octave 3.
