Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-08 Thread Olaf Foellinger
* Charles Day [08.01.09 08:23]wrote: >On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Olaf Foellinger ><[1]o...@foellinger.de> wrote: > > Hi, > * Charles Day <[2]ceda...@gmail.com> [05.01.09 01:14]wrote: > >>Maybe not too many care about building them, but a lot care about >>

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-07 Thread Charles Day
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Olaf Foellinger wrote: > Hi, > > * Charles Day [05.01.09 01:14]wrote: > > >Maybe not too many care about building them, but a lot care about > >distributing them once they are built. A distribution of GnuCash for > >Mac in binary form is one of the mo

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-07 Thread Olaf Foellinger
Hi, * Charles Day [05.01.09 01:14]wrote: >Maybe not too many care about building them, but a lot care about >distributing them once they are built. A distribution of GnuCash for >Mac in binary form is one of the more requested features (especially >recently) I see as a GnuCash de

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-05 Thread Charles Day
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > Charles Day wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Joshua Root > > wrote: > > > > Anders F Björklund wrote: > > > Charles Day wrote: > > > > > >> Well I tried the following workaround for ticket 1

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-05 Thread Joshua Root
Charles Day wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Joshua Root > wrote: > > Anders F Björklund wrote: > > Charles Day wrote: > > > >> Well I tried the following workaround for ticket 10881, but macports > >> started trying to include the wrong depen

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-04 Thread Anders F Björklund
Joshua Root wrote: "Given that this has been around for 2 years, is this considered a bug or a feature?" Heh, there are bugs that have been around longer... it just appears that relatively few people care about building binaries. Was referring to http://trac.macports.org/ticket/10881#co

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-04 Thread Anders F Björklund
Charles Day wrote: ... it just appears that relatively few people care about building binaries. Maybe not too many care about building them, but a lot care about distributing them once they are built. A distribution of GnuCash for Mac in binary form is one of the more requested features

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-04 Thread Charles Day
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > Anders F Björklund wrote: > > Charles Day wrote: > > > >> Well I tried the following workaround for ticket 10881, but macports > >> started trying to include the wrong dependencies. For example, it > >> tried to include dependencies based on X1

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-04 Thread Joshua Root
Anders F Björklund wrote: > Charles Day wrote: > >> Well I tried the following workaround for ticket 10881, but macports >> started trying to include the wrong dependencies. For example, it >> tried to include dependencies based on X11 when I specified gnucash >> +no_x11 (see gnome-desktop at the

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
Joshua Root wrote: DEBUG: Calling /Developer/Applications/Utilities/PackageMaker.app/Contents/MacOS/ PackageMaker for gnucash pkg Warning: Unknown argument: -AppleLanguages Warning: Unknown argument: (English) It is the same error I checked the the Apple docs on Packagmaker.app and they de

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-03 Thread Olaf Foellinger
Hi, * Ben Greenfield [03.01.09 09:30]wrote: >On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:57 AM, Charles Day wrote: > > Olaf, > >Before I joined the list, I saw an email from you in October >(see [1]http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2008-Octob >er/012020.html) about trying to p

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
Charles Day wrote: Well I tried the following workaround for ticket 10881, but macports started trying to include the wrong dependencies. For example, it tried to include dependencies based on X11 when I specified gnucash +no_x11 (see gnome-desktop at the end as an example). In addition

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-02 Thread Charles Day
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > Ben Greenfield wrote: > > > > On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:57 AM, Charles Day wrote: > > > >> Olaf, > >> > >> Before I joined the list, I saw an email from you in October > >> (see > http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2008-October/012

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-02 Thread Joshua Root
Ben Greenfield wrote: > > On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:57 AM, Charles Day wrote: > >> Olaf, >> >> Before I joined the list, I saw an email from you in October >> (see >> http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2008-October/012020.html) >> about >> trying to package gnucash with "port mdmg"

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-02 Thread Ben Greenfield
On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:57 AM, Charles Day wrote: Olaf, Before I joined the list, I saw an email from you in October (see http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2008-October/012020.html) about trying to package gnucash with "port mdmg". Were you ever successful in working around

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-01 Thread Charles Day
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Olaf Foellinger wrote: > Hi Charles, > > * Charles Day [01.01.09 12:30]wrote: > > >Olaf, > > > >Before I joined the list, I saw an email from you in October > >(see [1] > http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2008-Octob > >er/012020

Re: GnuCash packaging

2009-01-01 Thread Olaf Foellinger
Hi Charles, * Charles Day [01.01.09 12:30]wrote: >Olaf, > >Before I joined the list, I saw an email from you in October >(see [1]http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2008-Octob >er/012020.html) about trying to package gnucash with "port mdmg". Were >you ever