Max Asato wrote:
> I'm looking forward to the release of 1.7 as that should make an internal
> MacPorts mirror a bit easier to implement.
1.7.0 was released last Saturday. :-)
- Josh
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
ht
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:25:44PM -0500, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Max Asato wrote:
> >Are there any features in 1.7 that would
> >permit a read-only archive directory?
>
>
> Not that I'm aware of, but you could probably adapt one of the dusty
> patches in http://tra
On Dec 15, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Max Asato wrote:
I suppose that this does leave the door open for a shared repository
of binary archives but I don't think that I can get away with a world
writable shared directory. Are there any features in 1.7 that would
permit a read-only archive directory?
No
On Dec 15, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Max Asato wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:05:16AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 11, 2008, at 12:25, Joshua Root wrote:
Looks like you don't have the same Portfile on both machines. Have
you
synced them both lately? What does 'port info glib2' say on each
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:05:16AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 12:25, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> >Looks like you don't have the same Portfile on both machines. Have you
> >synced them both lately? What does 'port info glib2' say on each? I
> >suspect you'll find that they have
On Dec 11, 2008, at 12:25, Joshua Root wrote:
Max Asato wrote:
abk239$ port variants glib2
glib2 has the variants:
universal
puredarwin
darwin
powerpc
darwin_6
darwin_7
darwin_8
darwin_9
imac2$
Max Asato wrote:
This thread got a bit fragmented so I'll restate this particular
problem.
Sorry about the length of this posting.
I had created a binary archive on one system and copied the archive
to another system in the hopes that I could install the binaries
directly and avoid a second b
Max Asato wrote:
>abk239$ port variants glib2
>glib2 has the variants:
>universal
>puredarwin
>darwin
>powerpc
>darwin_6
>darwin_7
>darwin_8
>darwin_9
>imac2$ port variants glib2
>glib2
This thread got a bit fragmented so I'll restate this particular problem.
Sorry about the length of this posting.
I had created a binary archive on one system and copied the archive
to another system in the hopes that I could install the binaries
directly and avoid a second build. This would demo
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:43:21AM -0800, Max Asato said:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:59:55AM +0100, Anders F Bj?rklund wrote:
> >
> > If you run MacPorts in debugging mode (port -d), you should get
> > some output telling you what happened to the unarchive phase...
> > But when you enable portar
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 05:49:49AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> Do you have the same portarchivetype set on both systems?
>
> - Josh
I'll have to verify but I think it is the same. One install was done
from source and the other using the .dmg packaged installer but I would
expect the default
Max Asato wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:59:55AM +0100, Anders F Bj?rklund wrote:
>> If you run MacPorts in debugging mode (port -d), you should get
>> some output telling you what happened to the unarchive phase...
>> But when you enable portarchivemode=yes, it is supposed to try
>> "unarchiv
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:59:55AM +0100, Anders F Bj?rklund wrote:
>
> If you run MacPorts in debugging mode (port -d), you should get
> some output telling you what happened to the unarchive phase...
> But when you enable portarchivemode=yes, it is supposed to try
> "unarchive" (binary) before d
Max Asato wrote:
Last but not least, is there any way to get MacPorts to install
packages
from a port archive file that was built on another system? I've
set the
portarchivemode parameter in macports.conf on two intel Macs (both
running 10.4.11), built a package on one and copied the archiv
Max Asato wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:14:35PM +1100, Joshua Root wrote:
>> Max Asato wrote:
>>> We would ideally like to mirror the primary distfile server internally
>>> as well, but it sounds like that the new distserver.macports.org site
>>> is tied to the 1.7 release. I've futzed aroun
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:14:35PM +1100, Joshua Root wrote:
> Max Asato wrote:
> > We would ideally like to mirror the primary distfile server internally
> > as well, but it sounds like that the new distserver.macports.org site
> > is tied to the 1.7 release. I've futzed around with the mirror_si
Max Asato wrote:
> We would ideally like to mirror the primary distfile server internally
> as well, but it sounds like that the new distserver.macports.org site
> is tied to the 1.7 release. I've futzed around with the mirror_sites.tcl
> file a bit so it looks like it would be possible to direct
17 matches
Mail list logo
