On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 03:00, Scott Webster wrote:
> And you specifically installed from the pkg and not from source? I
> gather that is a difference here?
Installed from the package, yes.
--
brandon s allbery allber...@gmail.com
wandering unix systems admi
And you specifically installed from the pkg and not from source? I
gather that is a difference here?
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 01:57, Joshua Root wrote:
>> If your macports.conf was created by 1.8.x, it would have macportsuser
>> uncommente
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 01:57, Joshua Root wrote:
> If your macports.conf was created by 1.8.x, it would have macportsuser
> uncommented and set to root. So that would also hide the problem.
Doesn't look like it:
mress:10262 Z$ grep user /opt/local/etc/macports/macports.conf
zsh: exit 1
On 2011-7-8 12:09 , Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:42, Joshua Root wrote:
>> Notable changes since beta1 are:
>> * The pkg installer now actually creates the macports user as intended
>> (apparently nobody installed beta1 using the pkg?)
>
> For what it's worth, I saw no er
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:42, Joshua Root wrote:
> Notable changes since beta1 are:
> * The pkg installer now actually creates the macports user as intended
> (apparently nobody installed beta1 using the pkg?)
For what it's worth, I saw no errors either during the install or in
using the insta
Source code and disk images for MacPorts 2.0.0-beta3 are now
available [1]. Testing of either of these install methods is helpful.
While there are no known regressions from 1.9.2 at this point, be
prepared to encounter bugs. As always, having a recent backup would be
wise. Please report any bugs t