Citando Rainer Müller :
> Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Or change the name of the software. These restrictions apply only
> > in this case:
> >
> > [quoted from the LICENSE file]
> > If the name Ion(tm) or other names that can be associated with the Ion
> > project are used to distribute this sof
Interesting idea; this brings yet another possibility. The only problem
I could see with that strategy is yet-another-license-change forbidding
derivative works.
If PortMgr thinks this is the way it should be handled, we could do the
rename in the Debian fashion, but personally I won't be main
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Or change the name of the software. These restrictions apply only
> in this case:
>
> [quoted from the LICENSE file]
> If the name Ion(tm) or other names that can be associated with the Ion
> project are used to distribute this software, then:
> [/quoted]
Seems like D
On 2007-12-14 15:26:12 +0100, Markus Weissmann wrote:
> thanks for bringing this up here: Mr. Valkonen's license is absolutely
> unbearable.
> As an alternative: Perhaps you can bring the port back to the last sane
> licensed version - don't know if this is useful and/or possible.
> Either that
On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Markus Weissmann wrote:
Hi Pierre,
thanks for bringing this up here: Mr. Valkonen's license is
absolutely unbearable.
As an alternative: Perhaps you can bring the port back to the last
sane licensed version - don't know if this is useful and/or possible.
Eith
Hi Pierre,
thanks for bringing this up here: Mr. Valkonen's license is absolutely
unbearable.
As an alternative: Perhaps you can bring the port back to the last
sane licensed version - don't know if this is useful and/or possible.
Either that or remove it please.
Regards,
-Markus
On Dec
On Dec 13, 2007, at 16:13, paul beard wrote:
On 12/13/07, Rainer Müller wrote:
For me this sounds like a removal request... What is the problem
with a
version more than 28 days old? In my personal opinion ion3 with this
license addition does not qualify as free software any more.
Definitel
On 12/13/07, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> For me this sounds like a removal request... What is the problem with a
> version more than 28 days old? In my personal opinion ion3 with this
> license addition does not qualify as free software any more. Definitely
> remove it.
>
Wow, f
Pierre Queinnec wrote:
> Here are two mails T. Valkonen sent respectively to FreeBSD Ports [1]
> and pkgsrc [2], warning them of a license violation on his software,
> ion3 (x11/ion3).
>
> I'll be committing a removal of the port in 5 days if nobody wants to
> step up and take ownership from me. T
[sorry for cross-posting]
Hi all,
Here are two mails T. Valkonen sent respectively to FreeBSD Ports [1]
and pkgsrc [2], warning them of a license violation on his software,
ion3 (x11/ion3).
I'll be committing a removal of the port in 5 days if nobody wants to
step up and take ownership from
10 matches
Mail list logo
