On Dec 13 07:32:59, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 06:40, Jan Stary wrote:
> >
> > This is just insane.
> > I need jpeg and the whole TeX suite to install autoconf?
>
> No, you (apparently) need them to install autogen. autogen and autocon
Now that have put -x11 +no_x11 into variants.conf,
the xorg-* stuff is not being pulled in, but still:
The following ports are dependencies of autogen @5.18.4_1:
xz
libiconv
gperf
gettext
expat
ncurses
pkgconfig
guile
readline
libtool
gmp
libunistrin
I would like to leave one particular binary out of a package.
Namely, the sndfile-regtest of libsndfile is not intended
for the end user. What is the preferred way to do it?
Does macports have a 'packing list' where I could
expicitly say what to install and what not to install?
Jan
__
I just selfupdated 2.3.4 on my MacOSX 10.5.8
an try to install autogen.
hans@mac:~$ sudo port install autogen
---> Computing dependencies for autogen
---> Dependencies to be installed: guile libunistring texlive-basic
texlive-bin cairo xorg-libXext xorg-libX11 xorg-bigreqsproto xorg-inputproto
On Dec 06 18:45:11, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > On Nov 26 20:20:28, nore...@macports.org wrote:
> > > #49821: libsndfile - update to 1.0.26
> > > -+
> > > Reporter: hans@??? | Owner: macports-tickets@???
> > > Type: update
> On Nov 26 20:20:28, nore...@macports.org wrote:
> > #49821: libsndfile - update to 1.0.26
> > -+
> > Reporter: hans@??? | Owner: macports-tickets@???
> > Type: update | Status: new
> > Priority: Normal
On Sep 30 16:09:13, stephen.but...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm transitioning from Fink to MacPorts. When I initially setup my MacPorts
> install I *thought* I had removed all my Fink stuff from my path.
How exactly did you remove all your Fink stuff?
Be removing it "from your path", do you mean that yo
On Jun 08 14:27:33, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Jun 08 02:32:01, nore...@macports.org wrote:
> > #47790: pstree: update to 2.39
> > -+--
> > Reporter: hans@??? | Owner: mww@???
> > Type: update | Status: closed
> > Priority: Normal |
> On Jun 08 02:32:01, nore...@macports.org wrote:
> > #47790: pstree: update to 2.39
> > -+--
> > Reporter: hans@??? | Owner: mww@???
> > Type: update | Status: closed
> > Priority: Normal | Milestone:
> > Component: ports |
(ping)
On May 21 13:54:29, nore...@macports.org wrote:
> #47790: update pstree to 2.39
> -+--
> Reporter: hans@??? | Owner: mww@???
> Type: update | Status: new
> Priority: Normal | Milestone:
> Component: ports |Version:
ping
> On Apr 26 19:40:17, nore...@macports.org wrote:
> > #46947: sox: please update to @14.4.2
> > -+
> > Reporter: mopihopi@??? | Owner: hans@???
> > Type: update | Status: new
> > Priority: Normal | Milestone:
> >
> > The last release of http://www.openntpd.org/portable.html
> > happened about a month ago and explicitly states that it is
> > "known to build and work" on Mac OS X (10.9).
>
> yay!
>
> I think more recent openntpd fixed many of the issues that made it a poor
> generic choice. Some interested
> > To put it in context: my computers all use the same ntp server (
> > fr.ntp.pool.org) so that in theory they share the same clock. Turns out
> > that my Mac is about 5min (a bit over 300 seconds) ahead of the others, and
> > also of Bradley's VM. I've tried deactivating and reactivating (after
On Mar 05 09:17:22, allber...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > > Those aren't hardlinks, but /tmp is a symlink to /private/tmp. Your
> > > vim just happens to realpath(3) before saving, it seems.
> >
> > It's
On Mar 05 14:26:37, c...@macports.org wrote:
> I don't know why it exists, but a couple of top-level directories
> are symlinked into /private.
In my case,
$ ls -l /private/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 103 root wheel 3502 Mar 2 21:21 etc/
drwxr-xr-x2 root wheel68 Sep 24 2007 tftpboot/
drwxrw
On Oct 18 19:22:43, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
> MacPorts should be in /opt/local, not /private/opt/local.
> Is it possible that /opt is a symlink to /private/opt? Ancient versions of
> the Cisco VPN installer were known to have moved /opt to /private/opt, then
> placed a symlink at /opt.
Th
On Feb 26 15:38:53, rai...@macports.org wrote:
> On 2015-02-26 15:19, Jan Stary wrote:
> > Going through the log of the build,
> > I see that it not only checks for the libraries
> > mentioned as dependencies in the Portfile,
> > but also checks for ncurses and libiconv
Going through the log of the build,
I see that it not only checks for the libraries
mentioned as dependencies in the Portfile,
but also checks for ncurses and libiconv.
I don't see them mentioned anywhere in SoX;
is this somehow internal to macports?
The resulting sox binary does not depend on th
This is MacOSX 10.5.8/i386 using MacPorts 2.3.3
Darwin mac.stare.cz 9.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.8.0: Wed Jul 15
16:55:01 PDT 2009; root:xnu-1228.15.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
I am trying to install databases/libpqxx.
The build fails with main.log saying (full log below):
:info:build make[3]: Enterin
> > You will be using the mirror until you revert your changes. I would restore
> > the default configuration so you don't get caught mistakenly thinking that
> > 'rsync.macports.org' is down when it's your mirror that went down!
On the contrary, you should be using
a mirror close to you for reg
On Sep 27 09:53:02, allber...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > Generaly, I find the precompiled defaults quite sensible
> > in most of the packaging systems, having subpackages/flavors/variants etc.
> > it surprises me that you
On Sep 23 10:57:22, allber...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> > Have a look at OpenBSD's pkg_add(1)
>
> pkg is great if you can get away with defaults for everything. I always
> find myself forced into ports
Putting back the co
On Sep 05 16:48:44, allber...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> >> > Yeah MacPorts is the most awesome piece of software you will ever have
> >
> http://trac.macports.org/wiki/TeXLivePackages
> The above indicates ms is part of texlive-latex-recommended.
Thanks, the above link is what i was missing.
Jan
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.m
I am getting the following error while trying to compile a LaTeX file:
! LaTeX Error: File `everyshi.sty' not found.
I have the following texlive-* package installed:
texlive-basic @34245_0+doc
texlive-bin@2014_1+x11
texlive-common @
On May 03 12:27:18, billc_li...@greenbuilder.com wrote:
> I installed a non-MacPorts package on my server the other day -
> WordPress command line interface (wp-cli) which uses the "wp"
> command. It's working properly.
>
> But I just went to do my regular updates using MacPorts, and I've
> lost
> > At this point, one could tell that you conme from linux
> > even if you hadn't said so .
>
> So? What's the point? What if I had suggested reading the table from a plist?
"I don't remember the names of these commands.
Please change your utility so that it lets me
specify a table that replaces
On Apr 08 09:00:24, rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
> These days I spend my time switching back and forth between Linux/Debian and
> OS X. The various package management tools I use on the former (apt, apt-get,
> aptitude) all have a very similar syntax, but port has a number of
> just-or-completely
On Apr 11 07:55:47, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Apr 10 18:48:01, vit...@yandex.ru wrote:
> > Yes, but MacPorts can control this.
> > Instead of specifying "export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH"
> > in ~/.bash_profile it can (and should) specify it system-wide
> > in /etc/bashrc
>
> Absol
On Apr 10 18:48:01, vit...@yandex.ru wrote:
> Yes, but MacPorts can control this.
> Instead of specifying "export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH"
> in ~/.bash_profile it can (and should) specify it system-wide
> in /etc/bashrc
Absolutely not. Don't any program dare touch things in /etc.
> #42846: libsndfile @1.0.25 fails linking phase on mavericks 10.9.2
> -+
> Reporter: mtb19@??? | Owner: hans@???
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: Normal | Milestone:
> Component: ports |Version:
On Oct 28 00:21:19, macpo...@metaspasm.org wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:12 PM, bunk3m wrote:
> >
> > > /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin/dvdrip
> > > /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin/dvdrip-exec
> > > /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/
On Oct 27 17:12:56, bun...@gmail.com wrote:
>sudo port content dvdrip shows:
>
> /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin/dvdrip
> /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin/dvdrip-exec
> /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin/dvdrip-master
> /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin/dvdrip-mul
I am trying to build sysutils/tmux on MacOSX 10.4.11
It fails because 10.4.11 (Darwin 8.11.0) does not have
libproc.h that is included by tmux's osdep-darwin.c:
osdep-darwin.c:22:21: error: libproc.h: No such file or directory
This problem has been encountered before,
and there is even a known
On Jul 04 09:44:06, rai...@krugs.de wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using homebrew at the moment, but there are certain packges, which
> are not on homebrew (e.g. awesome and kde apps).
Create a homebrew port of awesome.
That way, not only will you get what you wanted,
but everyone will benefit from the fr
On Jun 11 07:53:22, pixi...@macports.org wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > On May 28 21:36:58, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 28 May 2013, at 08:12 PM, Jean-François Caron
> >> wrote:
> &
On May 28 21:36:58, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 May 2013, at 08:12 PM, Jean-François Caron wrote:
>
> > While download statistics might not be a good system, I do concur that
> > MacPorts very much would benefit from having a "discovery" mechanism by
> > which users find ou
On May 26 11:19:24, pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Besides manually link gmake to make (also manpage), is there a way in
> macports to like gmake to make?
Why would you want to do that?
>Also man gmake shows the following.
> Should it be updated?
>
> COPYRIGHT
>Copyright (C) 1992,
On Mar 25 00:33:21, scottclau...@mac.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After a recent update of Macports I now have the following constantly running
> in Mountain Lion terminal:
>
> # MacPorts Installer addition on 2009-11-22_at_17:22:04: adding an
> appropriate PATH variable for use with MacPorts.
> exp
While looking at various package's notes
(during the ongoing install notes debate),
I noticed a port with the following notes:
virtuoso has the following notes:
Disable antivirus when building this port.
Arguably, it is not of much use to the user
displaying this note _after_ the
On Feb 26 22:01:36, ctrelea...@cogeco.ca wrote:
> At 11:56 PM +0100 2/26/13, Chris Jones wrote:
> > > A simple "notes happened above" message would be ideal.
> >>
> Conversely, we'd be spewing twice as many messages
> if the install isn't interrupted.
> >>>
> >>> Why? If the messages were
On Feb 26 15:37:45, sewebs...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> > I agree, in such situations we cannot do anything.
> > How does that make install messages interspersed
> > in various places in the install output better
> > th
On Feb 26 17:35:45, jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
> > And even if he wanted to kill the ongoing installation,
> > why would he close the window, as opposed to simply
> > killing the process in that (terminal) window?
>
> There's a button there, the user can hit it.
>
> > To lose any possibili
On Feb 26 23:22:46, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Feb 26 16:56:23, jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
> > > Surely the install process does some maintenance at its exit
> > > (read: catches signals), and can spit out those messages even
> > > if it is exiting due to being interrupted (as opposed to
> >
On Feb 26 16:56:23, jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
> > Surely the install process does some maintenance at its exit
> > (read: catches signals), and can spit out those messages even
> > if it is exiting due to being interrupted (as opposed to
> > finishing without error).
>
> If MacPorts is qui
On Feb 26 15:27:57, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 09:41:18PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> >
> > Increasingly often, I see people replying To: the original
> > poster, with Cc: to the list. Such a message does reach
> > the recipients, but
>
On Feb 26 16:34:07, jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
> > The suggested 'port notes' works for a given package;
> > for example, if I run 'port install package', I can run
> > 'port note depof:package' after that and get all the notes,
> > in one place. But:
> >
> > (1) this should happen automati
On Feb 26 15:44:12, jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
> > There is nothing wrong with that;
> > apparently I need to re-read the port manpage.
> >
> > However, this still requires an action of the user besides 'install';
> > I believe that the notes of the newly installed packages (if any)
> > sho
If you reply to a message to this list on this list
(as opposed to off-list), please reply To: the list.
Increasingly often, I see people replying To: the original
poster, with Cc: to the list. Such a message does reach
the recipients, but
(1) it breaks the list functionality:
none of the Lis
On Feb 26 10:12:57, pixi...@macports.org wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 3:42 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > The modification IMHO belongs to port(1) itself:
> > remember what was installed in this run, then
> > print out all the messages (as opposed to printing
> > ever
On Feb 25 16:12:12, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> Back way before I expected to be able to return. Strange.
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:13:39PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Feb 25 07:42:04, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:05:07P
On Feb 25 08:57:09, ctrelea...@cogeco.ca wrote:
> At 2:05 PM +0100 2/25/13, Jan Stary wrote:
> >On Feb 24 20:50:52, ctrelea...@cogeco.ca wrote:
> >> At 5:23 PM -0600 2/24/13, Jim Graham wrote:
> >> >On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:03:54PM +, Chris Jones wrote:
>
On Feb 25 11:18:38, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 07:56:13AM -0800, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 25, 2013, at 5:42 AM, Jim Graham wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:05:07PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > >> On F
On Feb 25 07:42:04, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:05:07PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Feb 24 20:50:52, ctrelea...@cogeco.ca wrote:
>
> > > 3) Deliver the messages in another manner: eg, cause them to open
> > > in TextEdit or a brows
On Feb 25 00:05:09, jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
> Crown was a lovely autocorrect for cron
Crown job sounds a bit nasty though.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macpor
On Feb 24 20:50:52, ctrelea...@cogeco.ca wrote:
> At 5:23 PM -0600 2/24/13, Jim Graham wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:03:54PM +, Chris Jones wrote:
> >> On 24 Feb 2013, at 10:59pm, Jim Graham wrote:
> >
> >> There is nothing wrong with KDE, as long as you properly install the
> >> depend
On Feb 24 17:48:04, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:41:17AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> >
> > That's not how macport's ports are installed. You don't have to move
> > any icon anywhere.
>
> No, of course you don't. But
On Feb 24 17:30:02, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 03:08:50PM -0800, Scott Webster wrote:
>
> > You should not have had to copy "the icon" (I assume you mean the
> > application) anywhere. You could just run it from
> > /Applications/Macports or maybe it is /Applications/Ma
On Feb 24 17:03:57, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:48:38PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Feb 24 15:35:58, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > And now the real reason for this response. I haven't put the icon in
> > > finder&
On Feb 24 14:51:07, sewebs...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> > Does that mean that macports installs stuff out of /opt/local?
> > For example, under /Applications?
> >
>
> Yes.
Do we mention it in the Guide or in the FAQ?
On Feb 24 12:07:14, allber...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > > the right port command to point me to kdenlive, and installed
> > > and ran kdenlive.app.
> >
> > From macports? What's the kdenlive APP,
> &
On Feb 24 15:35:58, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > So does just double clipping the app in Finder work? It does for me...
>
> And now the real reason for this response. I haven't put the icon in
> finder's Applications folder (which I rarely use anyways), but it is in
> the dock, and yes, it wo
On Feb 24 12:29:11, allber...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
>
> > > always been flaky (and useless even when it runs, as you need to install
> > > all the KDE dependencies with debug symbols for it to be able to do
> > > anything at all useful).
> >
> > I
On Feb 24 10:48:24, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> ardour2 is in macports. The site for the binary version demands money
> for the Mac OS X working version (or you get a demo that doesn't save
> anything). Considering that I currently have $1.38 to last until my
> next disability payment in March,
On Feb 24 17:30:12, n...@syndicat.com wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 24. Februar 2013, 10:27:09 schrieb Jim Graham:
> > > >From macports? What's the kdenlive APP,
> > >
> > > as opposed to macport's multimedia/kdenlive?
> Mainly for audio ardour2 (and the upcoming 3) is worth a look as it aims to
> provide
On Feb 24 10:27:09, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:54:21PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Feb 24 08:05:02, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:24:15AM -0600, Jim Graham wrote:
> > >
> > > > O
On Feb 24 08:23:36, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 03:01:36PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Feb 24 07:24:15, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > This one had a pkg file, so
> > > I just double-clicked on it. It then asked me which drive to i
On Feb 24 08:05:02, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 07:24:15AM -0600, Jim Graham wrote:
>
> > Ok...what is the command to run kdenlive?
>
> Never mind this...I read deeper into the port man page and found
> the right port command to point me to kdenlive, and installed
> and
On Feb 24 07:24:15, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 01:42:30PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Feb 24 06:20:53, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:33:40PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> > What exactly is your MacOSX vers
On Feb 24 06:20:53, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:33:40PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Well, the binary version that I found failed---it requires Mt Lion or
> better.
What exactly is your MacOSX version (uname -a)?
How exactly did you try to install the binary package
On Feb 23 18:15:16, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm also hoping there's some audio editing software that can do things
> like work on either channel of stereo, merge stereo into mono,
> add/delete/edit audio chunks, combine audio samples (in series), blend them,
> modify volume level (overall or
On Feb 23 21:53:13, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
>
> > The top section says that macports is
> >
> > targeting mainly the current Mac OS X release (10.8, A.K.A. Mountain Lion)
> > and the immediately previous two (10.7, A.K.A. Lion and 10.6, A.K.A. Snow
> > Leopard).
> >
> > It might be ni
On Feb 23 17:31:17, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23 Feb 2013, at 05:17 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > On Feb 23 16:17:26, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> Are binary packages for darwin9 being built?
> >>
On Feb 23 12:43:10, pixi...@macports.org wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> >>> With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable
On Feb 23 12:49:48, bruce.mil...@nist.gov wrote:
> On 02/23/2013 12:44 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> >On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> >>On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> >>>With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable is installed in
On Feb 21 22:02:19, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Bruce R Miller wrote:
> > But a "plain perl" used from commands like
> > perl Makefile.PL
> > will use the more common installation directories,
> > like macports used to do, and every other OS does.
It does now, doesn'
On Feb 21 18:19:56, bruce.mil...@nist.gov wrote:
> As much as you or I may like to stay within managed packages,
> you never can keep up with CPAN and shouldn't try.
Why can't you? Why shouldn't you try?
Whenever there is stuff in CPAN that you want to have
on your macos, make a port of it, and i
On Feb 21 11:46:29, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> > And, let's be frank; Macs cater (wisely, perhaps) to
> > a group of users who don't know about, or want to know about, $PATH.
>
> ... and those people tend to not ever use the terminal ... ;-)
>
On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> > With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable is installed in
> > /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin
> > which is *NOT* where people expect to find programs.
> > And it's NOT a directory people want
On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> > With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable is installed in
> > /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin
On my MacOSX 10.5.8. with macports 2.1.3 it is not, thank god:
hans@mac:~$ cd /opt/local/bin/
ha
On Feb 23 16:17:26, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Are binary packages for darwin9 being built?
>
> I think not. They are only available for OSX 10.6 (darwin 10) onwards.
> https://build.macports.org/waterfall
I think http://guide.macports.org/#using.binaries
should be explicit abou
I am trying to install SoX using a binary package on my 10.5.8
which is
$ uname -a
Darwin mac.stare.cz 9.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.8.0: Wed Jul 15
16:55:01 PDT 2009; root:xnu-1228.15.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
The attempt to install with
sudo port -v -b install sox
fails and the log says
On Feb 19 21:38:06, guanoape...@gmx.ch wrote:
> Is there a black list for Tarot and other Black magic?
I took the liberty of creating one for you:
Tarot
Black Magic
> My customer wishes internet filter based on Catholic Church morale.
I assume your customer is demented, or at le
On Feb 13 18:59:45, lar...@macports.org wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> >
> > Linux tutorials (which are plentiful) will work as well, but remember that
> > Mac OS X is more BSD-like with some Linux accents like the bash shell.
>
> I don't see how bash is a Linux-
I am building libsndfile from git on MacOSX 10.5.8.
I know we have a port; I am experimenting with the source.
Building from the source needs ./autogen.sh to be run.
That's when I run into a problem:
> Script started on Wed Feb 20 21:41:40 2013
> hans@mac:libsndfile$ ./autogen.sh
> -n checking fo
On Feb 09 20:30:50, listmeis...@thestoneforge.com wrote:
> On Feb 09, 2013, at 14:24, Comer Duncan wrote:
> > I am wondering what the gurus say is a reasonable
> > update interval for macports?
This hardly takes a guru: update when you need to.
___
mac
> On Apr 15, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
> > I am not sure which version of Wine to install from Macports (there
> > are three), or if this is even the right approach for what I want to
> > do.
> >
> > The goal: Edit a "movie" (screen recording),
On Apr 18 12:01:12, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> 1. Without using MacPorts, I directly installed TeXLive 2011 (as
> part of MacTeX).
> I didn't realize that that distribution included the source files
> and build/install instructions for the asymptote application. So ...
>
> 2. I used MacPorts to ins
On Apr 15 23:04:58, Jeff Singleton wrote:
> Yes I am referring to the Wiki article found here...
> http://trac.macports.org/wiki/UsingTheRightCompiler
>
> I just can't say a lot for Clang. I have mentioned this before. I have
> taken many suggestions. Tried Tried and Tried some more to like Cla
> > I am willing to help this with ports that interest me.
> > Is there a way in trac to specifically select the ports
> > that have this problem?
>
> not that I know of (since you don't know what is going to be
> in /usr/local on any machine)
I tried searching in both the mailing list archives a
> OK, here is what I propose as a relacement/extension of FAQ#defaultprefix.
> * Why is /opt/local the default install location for MacPorts?
> * So with macports under /opt/local I can use /usr/local freely?
I just commited this (fixing the typos.)
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/FAQ#defaultprefi
On Apr 05 08:25:49, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > Again, this is not entirely true: the proper way for a port to
> > not accidently pick up unwanted dependencies is to say --disable-whatever
> > in the Portfile (and y
On Apr 05 08:47:47, Arno Hautala wrote:
> On 2012-04-05, Jan Stary wrote:
> >
> > (The XXX is where my English fails me. Could a native speaker
> > put the right verb in please that seems to slip my mind?)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > While this could be XX
On Apr 05 19:52:23, Christopher Vance wrote:
> I'll also mention that OpenBSD exclusively uses packages which are
> compiled elsewhere; all ported software is installed from packages;
> they have already reached where NetBSD is trying to get to.
> In addition, OpenBSD culture is to install from pac
.
I have an old, incompatible version of openssl in
/usr/lib/libssl.*, and a port that fails to build
because it picks that up.
What happens then? Should I temporarily rename /usr
so that the port does not pick that up and builds successfully?
> >>> Am 05.04.2012 um 10:25 schrieb Jan
On Apr 05 11:06:51, Dominik Reichardt wrote:
> Honoring the order in PATH so when /opt/local is in front of /usr,
> compilers will honor that.
PATH is where the binaries are looked for.
I am talking about libraries; compilers do not look
for libraries in PATH.
> So yes PATH has a lot to do with t
On Apr 05 10:49:01, Dominik Reichardt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, /usr in PATH is being honored
> opposed to /usr/local being picked up automatically.
I don't know how "honored" differs from "being picked up",
but PATH has nothing to do with this.
> Am 05.
On Apr 05 09:00:44, Jan Stary wrote:
> However, if a given port silently picks up something
> incompatible in /usr/local, if might fail and often will.
>
> Having macports isolated in /opt/local DID NOT save you from this.
> Removing /usr/local is what did.
One more point to th
> I agree now that /usr/local is on fact a bad choice.
> What I find cnfusing or unclear is the reasoning about it
> in the the FAQ.
>
> The most prominent reason given to me yesterday for not having
> /usr/local as a default prefix was that people will stupidly
> rewrite the stuff in there by bli
> If I keep MacPorts in its own prefix, it is easier to ensure that other
> software on my system does not get mixed up in a build.
No, not really. You have macports stuff in its own prefix, namely,
/opt/local. However, if a given port silently picks up something
incompatible in /usr/local, if mig
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
