You need to uninstall any ports built using 4.0, then uninstall
clang-4.0 and llvm-4.0, then reinstall the ports you need using clang 3.9.
Chris
On 09/05/17 19:56, ges...@ftp83plus.net wrote:
Doesn't work.
The following ports will break:
cctools @895_4
ld64-latest @274.2_1
I selected "y"
On 31/10/16 10:41, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Monday October 31 2016 10:49:55 Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
Just as with Subversion, the answer is no. Remember that the PortIndex
is specific to the macOS version you are running, so a server-generated
Ah, of course. I didn't actually know this bu
On 31/10/16 09:49, Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:18:42AM +0100, René J. V. Bertin wrote:
I may have overlooked this, but does github have any provisions that
would allow the PortIndex files to be generated on the server and
served with the actual repo contents? That woul
On 28/10/16 14:08, Peter Hancock wrote:
On 28/10/2016 13:10, Chris Jones wrote:
On 28/10/2016 11:03, Peter Hancock wrote:
On a snow leopard machine, mtr won't upgrade from 0.86 to 0.87.
The trouble, according to the log, is that IPPROTO_SCTP isn't defined.
What I did was to
On 28/10/16 12:45, Peter Hancock wrote:
On 28/10/2016 11:03, Peter Hancock wrote:
On a snow leopard machine, mtr won't upgrade from 0.86 to 0.87.
The trouble, according to the log, is that IPPROTO_SCTP isn't defined.
What I did was to edit /usr/include/netinet/in.h
and give IPPROTO_SCTP the
> On 22 Oct 2016, at 12:54 pm, Richard Cobbe wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:12:59PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
>> Hello MacPorts users and developers,
>>
>> MacPorts will be moving to GitHub soon. We're sending this email to
>> inform you about changes in how you access the MacPorts re
P.s. When sending a log file as an attachment please give the file name a
proper suffix, .txt, as without this email readers often do not know what to do
with it. The right extension makes it possible to view on iOS for instance
> On 9 Oct 2016, at 5:47 pm, Chris Jones wrote:
>
Hi,
> On 9 Oct 2016, at 2:13 pm, Comer Duncan wrote:
>
> I tried to follow the upgrade procedure and eventually got the complaint that
> lvm-3.3 is not supported. I'm attaching the log file and ask for advice
> about ways around this obstacle. Thanks for your help!
Personally i don't quite f
On 27/09/16 10:10, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Tuesday September 27 2016 04:00:26 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Yes it would. I've changed it in the Trac footer. I expect there are many
places in the guide and wiki where this needs to be changed, but the
documentation needs a major overhaul anyway.
> On 25 Sep 2016, at 3:32 pm, Yongwei Wu wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 25 September 2016 at 22:21, Chris Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 25 Sep 2016, at 2:49 pm, Yongwei Wu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 25 September 2
> On 25 Sep 2016, at 2:49 pm, Yongwei Wu wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 25 September 2016 at 21:35, Chris Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 25 Sep 2016, at 2:25 pm, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:29
> On 25 Sep 2016, at 2:25 pm, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Ken Cunningham
>> wrote:
>> What is happening exactly on my MacPros running 10.11, I wonder? Software
>> installed by macports on 10.11 is using clang++ (mostly) and g++
>> (sometimes). clang++ is
On 25 Sep 2016, at 1:29 pm, Ken Cunningham
wrote:
>>
>> The problem is not really about libc++; it's about mixing multiple C++
>> runtimes.
>
> Indeed.
>
> What is happening exactly on my MacPros running 10.11, I wonder? Software
> installed by macports on 10.11 is using clang++ (mostly) a
> On 25 Sep 2016, at 12:01 pm, Eneko Gotzon wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:49 AM, David Liontooth
>> wrote:
>> I could install gimp.app, but it's version 2.8.2 and gimp2 is 2.8.18, so
>> I'll just try to figure out how to start gimp2.
>
> I think 2.8.2 > 2.8.18 (2.8.2 > 2.8.02).
One last question … can you give me a quick idea of how much work would be
involved in me attempting to locally implement the first approach you mentioned
(different ports for different versions of octave). That is, starting with the
files for the 3.8.2 revision of the octave port, what would
Hi,
I would suggest in your case, because your port list might be a little
out of date, to not use the ./restore_ports.tcl scripts. Instead,
manually look at your myports.txt and requested.txt files, decide which
ports you still want and try install them one by one, with whatever
variants you
On 02/09/16 15:05, Ignatios Athanasiadis wrote:
The files, /opt/local and /opt/local/var/macports/software exist and when I run
echo $PATH it includes the path /opt/local/bin.
However, the file /opt/local/bin/port does not exist.
Also when I used to run open whatever.pdf file a pdf file would
again.
On 2 Sep 2016, at 14:14, Chris Jones wrote:
On 02/09/16 14:11, Ignatios Athanasiadis wrote:
Hi,
The command I used was : port version
Ignatios
Then yes, it looks like whatever it was you did (again, it helps to be
specific, you really have not said what you did) has hosed your mac
On 02/09/16 14:11, Ignatios Athanasiadis wrote:
Hi,
The command I used was : port version
Ignatios
Then yes, it looks like whatever it was you did (again, it helps to be
specific, you really have not said what you did) has hosed your macports
installation in someway. You can start by tryin
I tried to restore some files in my mac and they were restored unsuccesfully.
Now whe I try to access macports I get a command like: command not found.
Does this mean that I have lost all my ports?
would help if you told us what command you where trying to run ...
_
On 25/08/16 04:30, Kevin Walzer wrote:
On 8/24/16 5:26 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
According to
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/307128/how-do-i-cast-id-to-a-float
I guess that
scalefactor = ([[win backingScaleFactor] floatValue] == 2.0) ? 2
: 1;
instead of
scalefactor = ([win back
Hi,
You can have both installed at once. You just cannot have both using the
same python variant (for technical reasons in how ROOT installs in
python support). The error message should explain this quite clearly.
So exactly what variants are you using, and what messages do you get ?
Chris
> On 3 Jun 2016, at 7:23 pm, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Jun 1, 2016, at 10:21, Ryan Williamson
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm a fairly new user of MacPorts, so if this is a stupid question, please
>> excuse the newbie in the room.
>>
>> On Friday of last week I had the list of availabl
On 19/05/16 13:51, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Thursday May 19 2016 11:22:35 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
So it seems that the only feasible things are skipping the ObjC and/or ObjC++ compilers,
and the Java compiler. I'll try to round up my "little" experiment to assess if
that makes a lot of di
On 31/03/16 16:50, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 31, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Abdulrahman Alshammari wrote:
On Mar 31, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 31, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Abdulrahman Alshammari wrote:
Someone told me that I can download JDk from macports. However, I could not
find
You have been told several times you need to clean the *failing* port, which is
not xsane but libgcc Please run
> sudo port clean libgcc
> sudo port install libgcc
and then post the *complete* log you get…
On 19 Mar 2016, at 5:03 pm, [ftp83plus] mailto:ges...@ftp83plus.net>> wrote:
> Hell
ruct sigaltstack target_sigaltstack_used = {
> 0, 0, SA_DISABLE
> };
>
>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Chris Jones
>> wrote:
>>
>> Just try to install it and see what happens
>>
>> > sudo port install qemu-usermode
>>
>
t the
> first error reads:
> :info:build src/ld/parsers/lto_file.cpp:36:25: error: unordered_set: No such
> file or directory
>
> Could it be that some important file is missing or wasn't fetched properly?
Unordered_set is only available in C++11, which the ancient gcc 4.2 compile
> On 13 Mar 2016, at 7:02 pm, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks for specifying.
>
> Why does it fail, now?
Because you have not changed anything... You are simply explicitly specifying
some options identical to the defaults... You need to follow the advice Ryan
has already given you...
>
Hi,
On 29/02/16 11:35, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Backups to a locally attached disk work fine. I've used this for years without
backups becoming corrupted.
Backups to an Apple Time Machine over the network, whether over Ethernet or
wireless, work fine. I've used this for years without backups becom
On 22/02/16 12:38, Bachsau wrote:
Am 22.02.2016 um 08:52 schrieb Dave Horsfall :
I ask because either it won't back up .dotfiles, or I've forgotten to
click one of those box thingies...
Time Machine can do complete system restores, which is why it needs to backup
every file. However, it c
Just compress the log file before posting it. It will be a fraction of
its original size then...
On 10/02/16 05:14, Dave Horsfall wrote:
Sigh... Looks like I have to shorten my messages for this list, even
though we're asked to include as much info as possible...
I don't like publishing my
On 09/02/16 00:31, Gideon Simpson wrote:
The log file is 5 megs, should I open a new ticket and post it to the
site? Or send it to the list serve?
whatever you do compress the log file first, using bzip2 or similar. It
will then be a lot smaller.
-gideon
On Feb 8, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Bra
On 15/12/15 13:19, Mahendra Mundru wrote:
Hi all,
I installed x code 7.2, command line tools and
I followed the instructions at https://www.macports.org/install.php
when i try to selfupdate
38c98607ad02:~ mandru$ sudo port -v selfupdate
---> Updating MacPorts base sources using rsync
rsync:
> On 1 Nov 2015, at 5:13 p.m., Fabrizio Salvatore
> wrote:
>
> I simply did a port upgrade outdated. after I moved to the new OS... :-(
Then, as i already asked, which port was being upgraded just before the
installation of gcc48 was triggered ? The output should tell you this. Just
pos
On 30/10/15 13:21, Brethen, Mark Douglas. (MSFC-ES22)[ESSSA] wrote:
Did that.
Is it possible to reinstall 6.2,
https://developer.apple.com/downloads/
you probably want to reinstall command line tools and Xcode...
or should I go ahead and install 7.1?
On Oct 30, 2015, at 2:31 AM, Chris
On 30/10/15 12:26, Fabrizio Salvatore wrote:
I see that there are two ports related to gcc48, one of which is active:
---> The following versions of gcc48 are currently installed:
---> gcc48 @4.8.2_2
---> gcc48 @4.8.3_3 (active)
How do I remove both and make gcc49 the default one?
Try starting Xcode, and make sure in the preferences section for updates
everything is up to date. Also accept any licenses etc.
On 30/10/15 05:30, Mark Brethen wrote:
I don’t plan on installing El Capitain for a while. Macports website says 6.1
or later for Yosemite. I have 6.2.
xcode-sele
On 30/10/15 01:18, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:15 PM, David Strubbe mailto:dstru...@macports.org>> wrote:
The problem that was being mentioned here is that gcc48 doesn't
build. That should not imply that ports already built with gcc48
have any problem. So ther
Hi,
Gcc 4.8 currently does not build on OSX 10.11.
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/48471
I recommend uninstalling it, and any ports that need it, and reinstall them
using a new gcc version.
Chris
> On 29 Oct 2015, at 10:10 a.m., Fabrizio Salvatore
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have tried
Follow the migration guide
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration
On 27/10/15 08:33, Paolo Denti wrote:
Selfupdated macports for el capitain, then attempting to upgrade outdated.
Error for gcc48 and dependencies.
darwin14 platform, darwin15 platform requested, see below:
The following inst
Both links work just fine for me... must be your end.
On 21/10/15 08:15, Ryan Crocker wrote:
neither of those links are working. I just get the beachball and
nothing happens. I’ve tried on two different routers, computers and my
phone. Though the text version of:
http://webcache.googleuserco
Hi
> On 10 Oct 2015, at 7:45 p.m., Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
>> On Oct 10, 2015, at 7:28 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>> HFS+ is supposed to contain algorithms that limit file fragmentation, but
>> without a background process that moves files (or file blocks), it cannot
>> prevent free space fr
Do not set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH, doing so is a bad idea. If MatLab requires
this (is it really needed ??, I am quite surprised this is done into
internals inside an application in /Applications), report this as a bug
against MatLab...
On 08/10/15 08:21, Michel Perez wrote:
Jeremy,
Indeed, the
> On 2 Oct 2015, at 2:33 p.m., Bachsau wrote:
>
>
>> Am 02.10.2015 um 15:24 schrieb Brandon Allbery :
>>
>> If you don't like it, don't use OS X, because Apple is not going to change.
>> It will break stuff as it sees fit. This is the price of living in Apple's
>> world.
>
>
> Maybe. Seem
On 14/09/15 17:39, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
[…] A normal upgrade will first upgrade all the ports
dependencies, as required, such that you end up with a consistent
updated port. Only if you specifically disable this can you get into a
mess.
But if ports A and B both
On 14/09/15 15:49, Artur Szostak wrote:
Then why not protect all other upgrade operations with a -f | --force
flag, except when upgrading everything? It seems much too easy at the
moment to perform an upgrade operation that has a good chance of leading
to an inconsistent state.
no it will not
How very timely of them, given OSX 10.11 might well be announced rather
imminently..
On 09/09/15 16:46, Manfred Antar wrote:
XRG has been updated to work on Yosemite
The binary is available at the developer’s website.
The source code is also available there, It would be nice to be able to bu
>> El 2015-08-19, a las 11:53, Dominik Reichardt escribió:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 19.08.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Chris Jones :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> On 19/08/15 16:13, C.T. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Experience: 10.11
On 19/08/15 16:13, C.T. wrote:
Experience: 10.11 is still in beta, and it shows. With XCode beta, expect HOURS
of compilations for a mere update, and many manual operations since MacPorts
doesn’t yet recognizes El Capitan
I disagree on two of the three points.
Yes, you should expect to c
t;invoked from within
> "command_exec build"
>(procedure "portbuild::build_main" line 8)
>invoked from within
> "portbuild::build_main org.macports.build"
>("eval" body line 1)
>invoked from within
> "eval $proce
On 07/08/15 13:30, - wrote:
For some days now any port action that calls for gettext bombs. Here is
one part of the result:
Error: org.macports.build for port gettext returned: command execution
failed
Any thoughts?
Yes. Is that all that was posted, or was a log file mentioned by chance ?
And it's more than likely that it will happen. It would surprise me somewhat if
Atlas doesn't check for `-march=native` support, and that would give you AVX
(and later) support if your i7 supports that.
You ought to ask the question the other way round: how much of a (real-world)
performance
On 13/04/15 10:27, j. van den hoff wrote:
thanks to both of you for your answers and clarifications.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 04:04:14 +0200, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
On Apr 12, 2015, at 5:54 AM, j. van den hoff wrote:
I just have upgraded two x86_64 machines from 10.9. to 10.10.3 and
upgraded one o
OT: Recent developments have been chipping away at/from that "best
unix for the desktop" aspect, while KDE has given Linux a desktop
that's getting close to being as good (but KF5 seems to be making the
same kind of choices I dislike in recent OS X versions, so I'll
probably will hang on to OS X
OT: Recent developments have been chipping away at/from that "best unix for the
desktop" aspect, while KDE has given Linux a desktop that's getting close to being
as good (but KF5 seems to be making the same kind of choices I dislike in recent OS X
versions, so I'll probably will hang on to O
On 26/03/15 17:46, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Thursday March 26 2015 11:22:44 Brandon Allbery wrote:
It shouldn't be using :0.0 but instead the launchd socket. Or have you
"improved" that? In which case you get to debug your own breakage.
I have done nothing to improve that, this is what I ge
> On 23 Mar 2015, at 6:20 pm, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Chris Jones
>> wrote:
>> > The default permissions are likely to be fine:
>> >
>> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 9 Dec 24 02:58 /var/db/ntp.drift
>
> On 23 Mar 2015, at 6:14 pm, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>
>> On 23.03.2015 07:17 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>> I didn't have that file either (OS X 10.9), and the pacemaker manpage does
>> say something about the daemon exiting if the file isn't recreated within a
>> certain time after deletin
Hi,
Could be wrong but as I understood things /Library/Frameworks was only
ever for privately installed stuff used by third party applications, not
system libraries (those are under /System/Library/Frameworks and in the
Xcode package area) and as such I am surprised this area was ever search
On 08/03/15 20:42, Michael Crawford wrote:
ask about in on a high energy physics list, or a HEP google group.
particle physicists are heavily into fortran.
Speaking as one, we used to use F77, years back, but these days we
mostly use C++.
___
macpo
On 20/01/15 02:37, Joshua Root wrote:
Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:34 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
What could be an option:
- use xz instead of bzip2 to compact things a bit more
this would probably be a small change (I think there's support for gzip and zip
already) - but chan
Hi,
On 20/01/15 02:49, Craig Treleaven wrote:
At 8:20 PM + 1/19/15, Chris Jones wrote:
> On 19 Jan 2015, at 7:13 pm, Craig Treleaven
wrote:
> At 3:11 PM + 1/19/15, Chris Jones wrote:
...
Does anyone else find it bizarre that, in 2015, we've got such an
active t
Hi,
> On 19 Jan 2015, at 8:28 pm, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> On Monday January 19 2015 20:20:06 Chris Jones wrote:
>
>>> If one has a too-small SSD, it seems more-than-a-little strange to complain
>>> that building/installing a bunch of software packages consume
Hi,
> On 19 Jan 2015, at 7:13 pm, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>
> At 3:11 PM + 1/19/15, Chris Jones wrote:
>> ...
>
> Does anyone else find it bizarre that, in 2015, we've got such an active
> thread about saving a few gigs of space?
Nope. Saving disk space when
But I admit it is not very useful nowadays. It should be optional, at least when
the version installed is the default one, i.e. the binary can be re-downloaded
verbatim from the server (not a bespoken version with various variants set).
I disagree. I often use deactivation and activation, and
It is also correct that all other package systems you're familiar with
never have to build locally from source.
True, but I don't agree it completely negates the argument.
Possibly if you can get away with always operating in binary mode then
we could re-download missing archives from packag
Well, I'm a grownup and willing to take these chances. I don't
play with activate/deactivate. I know of no other distros that
"wastes" that kind of disk space for that. That some wish to
use this feature, fine. But I need those gigs back.
Removing these files will very likely break your up
On 19/01/15 09:34, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Please Reply All so that the discussion stays on the mailing list.
On Jan 19, 2015, at 3:26 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
Le 19 janv. 2015 à 09:27, Ryan Schmidt a écrit :
Hi Ryan,
If you mean /opt/local/var/macports/software, that's where the compressed
> On 2 Jan 2015, at 6:00 am, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:46 AM, P Kishor wrote:
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3526821/main.log
>
> So, the actual error is a link error for a bunch of missing symbols. Looking
> for why those symbols might be missing, I fin
Just compress it, using bzip2 or whatever you prefer then.
Text logs always compress very well so it will be much smaller...
Chris
> On 2 Jan 2015, at 5:46 am, P Kishor wrote:
>
> The log file is 360 KB, so I have put it on my Dropbox/Public folder
> (see link below)
>
> https://dl.dropbox
On 18/12/14 15:27, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Daniel J. Luke mailto:dl...@geeklair.net>> wrote:
also, why would homebrew be using a patch from macports like that
anyway?
Homebrew's been "reusing" stuff for a while now.
Strange how they don't just take a
On 19/11/14 10:45, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Wednesday November 19 2014 10:20:23 Chris Jones wrote:
That though does not make what I said incorrect. clang 3.4 fully
supports c++11. A statement of fact.
Please don't take my statement about C++11 support out of context.
Relevant ea
The issue you describe is an issue with the *deployment* of clang in
MacPorts/OSX. Something else.
... or an issue with the package itself that prevents it being
compiled with clang (I have come across plenty of issues myself of code
that compiles with gcc but fails with clang, because of b
On 18/11/14 23:05, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Tuesday November 18 2014 22:59:51 Chris Jones wrote:
Clang 3.4 fully supports c++11 ( if i recall correctly it is complete as of
3.3). So whatever problems you where having it wasn't because clang does not
fully support c++11...
Sorry, bu
> On 18 Nov 2014, at 6:30 pm, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> On Tuesday November 18 2014 18:16:53 Chris Jones wrote:
>
>>> This is on 10.6.8, where the C++ runtime issues are in fact more with
>>> clang. Using a recent GCC is the only sort-of-reliable way to bui
On 18/11/14 18:12, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Tuesday November 18 2014 17:57:55 Chris Jones wrote:
the portfile has been setup to use by the port maintainer. Specifically,
forcing the use of gcc to build c++ code is very problematic due to the
much discussed runtime issues, and consequently
On 18/11/14 17:53, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Tuesday November 18 2014 11:59:10 Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
The GPL does not prohibit binary distribution.
No, but I was under the impression that Apple doesn't want to distribute GPLed
binaries. As I said, I'm not complaining.
Yes, setting co
The long paths are not a MacPorts specific issue
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750231
On 10/11/14 08:20, Nicolas Pavillon wrote:
Hello,
It's been some time, but I had tried to make a Portfile for pykde4, and
then gave up because of several different issues, including the
d
On 31/10/14 07:43, Eneko Gotzon wrote:
[Maybe this kind of reports are stupid]
Just the wrong place. This list has nothing to do with the cooling
capabilities of your machines. If you have concerns on that front you
should take them to Apple, not here.
--
Eneko Gotzon Ares
__
in an attempt to minimize exposure to Shellshock. IIRC I got the above
from someone on this list.
Together, if I recall, with a number of posts saying it was also a very
bad idea
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge
Hi,
How have you figured the VM to connect to the network. Direct, or NAT ?
Does MacPorts work OK on the host machine directly ?
I have serveral OSX VMs running in a MacMini, previously running OSX
10.9 (now 10.10), and they worked just fine with MacPorts. I have them
connecting directly to m
there are other ways
> to approach this problem...
If you want to go against the advice of the experts (not me btw) and not follow
the migration guide that is your choice. The guide says what it does for good
reasons, not just for the fun of reinstalling...
>
>> On Sun, Oct
> On 19 Oct 2014, at 7:30 pm, Carlo Tambuatco wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Chris Jones
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 19 Oct 2014, at 7:23 pm, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:
> On 19 Oct 2014, at 7:26 pm, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> On Oct 19, 2014, at 12:57 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
>>
>> I still think something went wrong and some memory of your previous OSX 10.9
>> installations is still present. I cannot see how you would get
> On 19 Oct 2014, at 7:23 pm, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Chris Jones
>> wrote:
>> Well yes, you do not have to reinstall everything after removal. The
>> important bit is the removal step... ;)
>
> But the thing you com
> On 19 Oct 2014, at 7:17 pm, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Chris Jones
>> wrote:
>> ... it is not a matter of 'seeing fit'. Unless you want ongoing problems,
>> the only correct thing to do is to reinstall *all* your p
> On 19 Oct 2014, at 7:02 pm, Carlo Tambuatco wrote:
>
> Have you upgraded macports to the newest version for OS X 10.10? Do you have
> your Xcode command line tools installed for OS X 10.10? Are you using the
> latest available Xcode 6.1? Unless you've explicitly uninstalled all your
> po
orts. There may be a
> simpler solution.
So do i take it that you didn't do this when you upgraded, i.e. You didn't
properly follow the migration guide ? If so, then thats your problem. You need
to do what it says, there is no alternative.
>
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014
ething went wrong and some memory of your previous OSX 10.9
installations is still present. I cannot see how you would get messages
regarding Darwin 13 otherwise. At this point i would perhaps suggest completely
wiping macports
https://guide.macports.org/chunked/installing.macports.uninstallin
Hi,
gcc48 and libgcc installed fine for me in a OSX10.10 VM I had running with the
Xcode 6.1 beta prelease. Did you correctly follow the MacPorts migration guide
after upgrading your OS.
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration
The references below to Darwin 13 (OSX 10.9) suggests to me you di
> On 19 Oct 2014, at 10:19 am, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
>> On Saturday October 18 2014 19:16:39 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Remember to Reply All when you reply.
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 18, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Carlo Tambuatco wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, just upgraded my ports yesterday after upgrading to Yose
Its quite simple, you need the OSX 10.10 SDK, which is only available in Xcode
6.1, which for whatever reason is not released yet. You need to wait for it
> On 18 Oct 2014, at 10:20 pm, Gregory Shenaut wrote:
>
> I'm rebuilding my ports after installing Yosemite, and I'm stuck at cmake
>
On 13/10/14 15:09, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Monday October 13 2014 14:34:15 Chris Jones wrote:
Any scripts that make any assumptions on what $DISPLAY looks like are
flawed by designed...
My argument is not based on what some standard says about what DISPLAY
should or should look like, but
Hi,
Any scripts that make any assumptions on what $DISPLAY looks like are
flawed by designed...
I don't agree :
(and not being an English fully-native speaker myself I won't comment about
arguments with grammatical errors :P )
http://www.xfree86.org/4.0/X.7.html#toc4
http://www.x.org/archive
On 13/10/14 11:50, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
Come to think of it, I can't (or maybe, refuse to) see a good, compelling
reason why a local X11 server would have to use a non-human-readable $DISPLAY
spec if it can be identified uniquely through :0 (or :1, :2 etc for subsequent
instances). It's als
On 13/10/14 01:05, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Sunday October 12 2014 18:54:12 Brandon Allbery wrote:
No, it still uses launchd. And, such unusual DISPLAYs *do* exist outside of
Only if you leave the launchd plist in place. I prefer to launch my X11 server
by hand or not at all, so the plist
u might as well ask Apple to release the code for its
entire OS. Good luck with that one.
Anyway, this is now getting more than a bit OT for this list...
>
>> El 11/10/2014, a las 17:25, Dominik Reichardt escribió:
>>
>>
>>>> On 11.10.2014, at 21:22, Chris Jo
> On 11 Oct 2014, at 8:13 pm, C.T. wrote:
>
>
>> El 11/10/2014, a las 6:25, Chris Jones escribió:
>>
>> A lot. Rosetta was not just an application you could install, but an
>> extension of the underlying OS to provide the translation layer for PowerPC
>
>
> In fact, certain changes in 10.9 (like with Mail.app) have gotten me to
> investigate KDE for alternatives ... And 10.6 still has Rosetta (and frankly,
> how much would it have cost to provide that tech as an optional install?)
A lot. Rosetta was not just an application you could install,
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
