Re: iperf3 port coming?

Thanks all! Cheers, Smith --- Smith Kennedy Wireless Architect - Client Software - IPG-PPS Standards - PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum PWG Chair HP Inc. > On May 24, 2016, at 4:33 PM, David Evans wrote: > >> On 5/24/16 3:19 PM, Mike Savory wrote: >> Hi Smit

Re: iperf3 port coming?

On 5/24/16 3:19 PM, Mike Savory wrote: > Hi Smith > > I have a copy of the portfile in my local ports directory > https://guide.macports.org/#development.local-repositories > > I can get rid of it now ;-) > > Mike Indeed. iperf3, iperf3-devel committed in https://trac.macports.org/changeset/14

Re: iperf3 port coming?

Hi Smith I have a copy of the portfile in my local ports directory https://guide.macports.org/#development.local-repositories I can get rid of it now ;-) Mike > On 25/05/2016, at 9:41 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) > wrote: > > Bad memory / losing my mind / too much going on - I'm t

Re: iperf3 port coming?

Bad memory / losing my mind / too much going on - I'm the one that filed the original ticket and commented 2 weeks ago with Comment #19. That comment went unanswered - I still don't see an "iperf3" port when I do a "port search iperf" or "port search iperf3". Why would that be? Mike, how is

Re: iperf3 port coming?

There was lots of discussion on under the iperf2 port and a full port is there for iperf3 I have been using it all year. https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44299 Just needs to be committed for version 3.1.2 Mike > On 25/05/2016, at 8:09 AM, David Evans wrote: > > On 5/24/16 12:57 PM, Kennedy,

Re: iperf3 port coming?

On 5/24/16 12:57 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) wrote: > Hi there, > > Is the maintainer of the iperf port or anybody else planning a port for > iperf3 (https://github.com/esnet/iperf)? The latter is not backward > compatible with iperf 2.x (2.0.5 is latest in MacPorts). I can file a

iperf3 port coming?

Hi there, Is the maintainer of the iperf port or anybody else planning a port for iperf3 (https://github.com/esnet/iperf)? The latter is not backward compatible with iperf 2.x (2.0.5 is latest in MacPorts). I can file a ticket in Trac but thought I'd ask here first. Cheers, Smith

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

But note that, if you have the more secure Java 8 installed, Java 6 and 8 runtimes will conflict in recent versions of OS X, where only one Java runtime is allowed to be active. One can still use java 8 yet “fool" some legacy apps into using Java 6, as instructed at: https://oliverdowlin

Re: Imagick version?

Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> 3) in my experience, I always have to force rebuild php\d{2}-imagick >> whenever ImageMagick is updated > > Out of curiosity, what problems did you encounter, other than the warning > message, if you did not rebuild? just got the error-message whenever I ran a script - a

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

On May 24, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Marius Schamschula wrote: > Java SE 6 is apparently no longer on Apple’s servers (I looked for it a week > or two ago). Java SE 6 for OS X 10.7 Lion through OS X 10.11 El Capitan: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1572 For Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard: https://suppor

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

I did the same, installing octave with -java variant. Finally, it’s working. Thanks to all who gave help in this thread. > On May 24, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Marius Schamschula > wrote: > > Murray, > > On May 24, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Murray Eisenberg > wrote: > >> Uh oh! Then how do I get octav

Re: Imagick version?

> On May 24, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen > wrote: > > Joshua Root wrote: >> Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: >>> You'll just have to re-compile php55-imagick : >>> >>> This will take care of all of your php\d{2}-imagick versions >>> >>> port -q installed name:imagic \ >>> | while read -a po

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

Murray, On May 24, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote: > Uh oh! Then how do I get octave to run at all, given that it requires the > Java 6 runtime? (And I have Java 8 from Oracle as the active runtime.) > > > >> On May 24, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> >> On May 24

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

Ryan, On May 24, 2016, at 10:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote: > >> (I’m unsure why I installed with the +java variant in the first place!) > > Looks like +java is in octave's default variants, so you'd get it, unless you > specifically disab

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

Uh oh! Then how do I get octave to run at all, given that it requires the Java 6 runtime? (And I have Java 8 from Oracle as the active runtime.) > On May 24, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote: > >> (I’m unsure why I installed wi

Re: Quartz vs x11: Inaccessible package meld

> On May 23, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Peter Brommer wrote: > > Hi, > > somehow the quartz vs x11 has flared up on the list again, and I now have my > own problem to add. I’m running mostly quartz packages (mainly inkscape, > gimp…). This means I have gtk2 +quartz as the active installation: > > $

Re: Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote: > (I’m unsure why I installed with the +java variant in the first place!) Looks like +java is in octave's default variants, so you'd get it, unless you specifically disabled it. ___ macports-users

Re: Going on holiday

On 5/24/16 7:28 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On May 23, 2016, at 3:17 PM, David Evans wrote: > >> Later this week, I will be heading out of the country on holiday for about a >> month in exotic locations where the >> internet may only be a rumor. Not taking a computer either. Should be back >

Re: Failed build of OpenBlas on El Capitan

Hi Comer - Looks like you're experiencing ticket #50950 < https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50950 >. Maybe some part of the discussion on it will be useful? HTH! - MLD On Tue, May 24, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Comer Duncan wrote: > Yesterday I upgraded mac os to El Capitan. All went fine.  Later I > went

Re: Failed build of OpenBlas on El Capitan

On May 24, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Comer Duncan wrote: > Yesterday I upgraded mac os to El Capitan. All went fine. Later I went > through the recommended process for macport changes when a new os is > installed. I am getting a crash on the build of OpenBlas. I am attaching > the log file and hope

Octave won't start, looks for legacy Java SE 6 runtime

I have octave installed with variants: octave @4.0.2_0+app+atlas+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+java+qt4gui+sound When I try to run octave from command line, I get pop-up window: ‘To open “this Java application” you need to install the legacy Java SE 6 runtime.” Under OS X 10.

Re: Going on holiday

On May 23, 2016, at 3:17 PM, David Evans wrote: > Later this week, I will be heading out of the country on holiday for about a > month in exotic locations where the > internet may only be a rumor. Not taking a computer either. Should be back > toward the end of June full of energy > with ren

Re: How add variant when upgrading octave

That fixed things. Thanks. > On May 23, 2016, at 9:04 PM, David Strubbe wrote: > > I'm not sure what you actually tried. Please do "sudo port clean qrupdate; > sudo port install qrupdate +atlas +gcc5". > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Murray Eisenberg > wr

Re: Imagick version?

Joshua Root wrote: > Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: >> You'll just have to re-compile php55-imagick : >> >> This will take care of all of your php\d{2}-imagick versions >> >> port -q installed name:imagic \ >> | while read -a port >> do port -n upgrade --force ${port[0]} >> done >> >> but more exp

Imagick version?

Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: You'll just have to re-compile php55-imagick : This will take care of all of your php\d{2}-imagick versions port -q installed name:imagic \ | while read -a port do port -n upgrade --force ${port[0]} done but more explicitly for just php55-imagick : port -n upgr