Re: Not really MacPorts problem, I don't think.

2015-01-30 Thread Bill Christensen
On 1/24/15 12:32 AM, Joshua Root wrote: On 2015-1-24 14:40 , William H. Magill wrote: On Jan 23, 2015, at 2:36 AM, Joshua Root wrote: At 8:42 PM -0600 1/22/15, Ryan Schmidt wrote: So launchd is launching apache too early. I believe there are some keys one can use in a launchd plist that woul

Re: Why the executable binary of the aria2 download manager is named aria2c?

2015-01-30 Thread Arno Hautala
From: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/aria2 > > The executable name for the aria2 package is aria2c. This legacy naming > convention has been retained for backwards compatibility. I don't know what legacy naming convention they're referring to, but… that's why? On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:59

Why the executable binary of the aria2 download manager is named aria2c?

2015-01-30 Thread Behrang Saeedzadeh
Hi, Nothing important, but I have always wondered why the binary is named aria2c rather than aria2? Was it clashing with another package that its executable file was called aria2? Best regards, Behrang http://www.behrang.org ___ macports-users mailing l

Re: click-to-raise-and-focus behaviour

2015-01-30 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hi, I've submitted a patch for xfwm4 at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/46717 . With XFCE 4.6.2 that's in MacPorts quite outdated (and xfce4-panel not even building for me), I've spent some time updating xfwm4, xfce4-panel and their dependencies to the current version (4.11). That'll break the