On 1/24/15 12:32 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2015-1-24 14:40 , William H. Magill wrote:
On Jan 23, 2015, at 2:36 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
At 8:42 PM -0600 1/22/15, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
So launchd is launching apache too early. I believe there are some
keys one can use in a launchd plist that woul
From: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/aria2
>
> The executable name for the aria2 package is aria2c. This legacy naming
> convention has been retained for backwards compatibility.
I don't know what legacy naming convention they're referring to, but…
that's why?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:59
Hi,
Nothing important, but I have always wondered why the binary is named
aria2c rather than aria2? Was it clashing with another package that its
executable file was called aria2?
Best regards,
Behrang
http://www.behrang.org
___
macports-users mailing l
Hi,
I've submitted a patch for xfwm4 at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/46717 .
With XFCE 4.6.2 that's in MacPorts quite outdated (and xfce4-panel not even
building for me), I've spent some time updating xfwm4, xfce4-panel and their
dependencies to the current version (4.11). That'll break the