I recently upgraded to Yosemite.
I use macports very infrequently and with considerable trepidation
because many of the messages it spits out don't mean a lot to me. Prior
to the upgrade to Yosemite, I think I had two ports installed.
Today I wanted to install a new port, nco.
After some init
> I don't truly understand how base works and fits together, and my feeling is
> few people do, or someone would have figured out the solution to weird bugs
> like https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37093 by now.
I assure you the logging code is not that hard to understand compared
with some other
Hi,
Just asked about this on kde-mac, but realised it might well be MacPorts that
sets -fvisibility=hidden (and ditto for inlines).
Any chance that explains the messages below, and what fvisibility setting
should one use to avoid them?
-- Forwarded Message --
Any idea what t
Hi,
> "Tends to work", yes. We don't support that configuration, so just hope you
> don't run into any problems with it.
another data point might be interesting here. During the upgrade to Yosemite
I rebuilt all of my ports without Xcode and the 10.10 SDK in trace mode.
All of my 500+ ports eithe
On Nov 20, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
> MacPorts tends to work fine without Xcode unless a package needs xcodebuild.
>
> On Nov 20, 2014, at 10:41, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
>> MacPorts should do fine with the commandline tools, no? (xcode-select -p
>> /Library/Developer/Comma
MacPorts tends to work fine without Xcode unless a package needs xcodebuild.
On Nov 20, 2014, at 10:41, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> MacPorts should do fine with the commandline tools, no? (xcode-select -p
> /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools)
___
macp
Just in case, about Yosemite tell you that:
- I find it much more responsive than Mavericks (using a middle 2014
MacBook Air).
- A first update (10.10.1) has already been delivered
--
Eneko Gotzon Ares
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-u
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Michael wrote:
> I can't get it to actually load a kernel driver to get the user fuse stuff
> going, and mount_ntfs never gets called.
>
> Are you on Yosemite? Apple no longer allows unsigned kernel drivers unless
> you tweak a magic boot setting, so ports lik
On Nov 20, 2014, at 5:47 AM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>>> That's on 10.6, where I have indeed seen clang-3.4 consume huge amounts of
>>> memory on a single file, AFAIK that compiler wasn't being used. However, if
>>> port upgrade outdated uses a single tclsh process for the whole procedure,
>>> and
>
Hi,
>> OK. BTW, isn't SQLite a protocol that doesn't really scale well? I'm far
>> from an
>> expert on this kind of subject, but I recently followed advice on the
>> kdepim-user ML to migrate my akonadi db to mysql (mariadb, as is the default
>> for port:akonadi), and performance has become way
On Nov 20, 2014, at 4:30 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday November 20 2014 11:11:05 Clemens Lang wrote:
>
>>> What is the point of all those scans, if I may ask?
>>
>> We're not the ones doing them, SQLite is. We don't really care how SQLite
>> does
>> things, as long as it's fast.
>
Hi,
- On 20 Nov, 2014, at 09:53, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
> Are you saying that for each file, you first look up the port again and again,
> which is probably an operation of a certain cost too?
No, we're not doing that manually. We're just sending a database query with tw
On Nov 20, 2014, at 2:53 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday November 20 2014 09:24:56 Clemens Lang wrote:
>
>> The slowness occurs because a database query uses an index to select all
>> files
>> installed by the port currently being processed and then continues to scan
>> over
>> this
Hi,
- On 20 Nov, 2014, at 03:14, Merton Campbell Crockett
m.c.crock...@roadrunner.com wrote:
> It would seem to me that if there were a general problem with changes to the
> database software, I should have seen delays when the 15 outdated software
> packages were processed before processing
14 matches
Mail list logo
