Thanks to all for your help.
Nicholas, I will wait for the results of your investigation. I can send the
crash log report if you would like to see it.
Regards,
Stan
On May 20, 2014, at 9:51 PM, Nicolas Pavillon
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think that the solution will be simpler. The patch in qu
On May 20, 2014, at 21:52, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> On May 20, 2014, at 22:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On May 20, 2014, at 19:56, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>>
>>> Is this something we should have the scripts check before running? If the
>>> MacPorts version is newer than they’re expecting, deman
Do our version numbers mean nothing?
It would seem our own scripts that do break on releases should be smart enough
to realize a change in MacPorts version.
On May 20, 2014, at 22:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On May 20, 2014, at 19:56, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>
>> Is this something we should have
Hello,
I think that the solution will be simpler. The patch in question is
supposed to improve the responsivity of several KDE applications, but if
it implies that other applications are crashing, it should not be
employed in its present form. I will revert the patch later today when I
have a
On May 20, 2014, at 21:44, Ian Wadham wrote:
> To keep his finances running, Stan should revert to all KDE being at
> 4.12.4, but I do not know how to do that in MacPorts in any simple way.
Right, it's not simple; MacPorts is designed for you to use the
currently-available version of ports. The
Hello Ryan and Stan,
On 21/05/2014, at 11:48 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On May 20, 2014, at 20:37, Stan Sanderson wrote:
>>
>> Mac 10.9.2, kmymoney4 @4.6.4_0 (active), MacBook Air
>>
>> I have been using kmymoney4 since the beginning of the year without any
>> problems. port selfupdate and por
On May 20, 2014, at 18:16, Davide Liessi wrote:
> 2014-05-21 1:01 GMT+02:00 Ryan Schmidt:
>> port_binary_distributable.tcl was fixed to be compatible with both MacPorts
>> 2.2.x and 2.3.x so make sure you have the latest version of the script from
>> the repository.
>
> Indeed
> /opt/local/va
On May 20, 2014, at 20:37, Stan Sanderson wrote:
>
> Mac 10.9.2, kmymoney4 @4.6.4_0 (active), MacBook Air
>
> I have been using kmymoney4 since the beginning of the year without any
> problems. port selfupdate and port upgrade outdated was run last night. Now I
> am unable to open kmymoney4-
Mac 10.9.2, kmymoney4 @4.6.4_0 (active), MacBook Air
I have been using kmymoney4 since the beginning of the year without any
problems. port selfupdate and port upgrade outdated was run last night. Now I
am unable to open kmymoney4- the message “kmymoney quit unexpectedly.” appears
after the sp
Hi,
>I was trying to use port_binary_distributable.tcl, but I get the
>following error:
>
>$
>/opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/base/portmgr/jobs/port_binary_distributable.tcl
>-v bash
>couldn't read file "/Library/Tcl/macports1.0/macports_fastload.tcl":
>no such file or d
2014-05-21 1:01 GMT+02:00 Ryan Schmidt :
> port_binary_distributable.tcl was fixed to be compatible with both MacPorts
> 2.2.x and 2.3.x so make sure you have the latest version of the script from
> the repository.
Indeed
/opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/base/portmgr/j
On May 20, 2014, at 17:08, Davide Liessi wrote:
> I was trying to use port_binary_distributable.tcl, but I get the
> following error:
>
> $
> /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/base/portmgr/jobs/port_binary_distributable.tcl
> -v bash
> couldn't read file "/Library/Tcl/m
Hi all,
I was trying to use port_binary_distributable.tcl, but I get the
following error:
$
/opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/base/portmgr/jobs/port_binary_distributable.tcl
-v bash
couldn't read file "/Library/Tcl/macports1.0/macports_fastload.tcl":
no such file or direc
> On 20 May 2014, at 22:18, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Gustavo Seabra
>> wrote:
>> On May 20, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> > And in case it's not clear, XQuartz is the same software that's available
>> > in MacPorts in the xorg-* ports. The vers
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
> On May 20, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > And in case it's not clear, XQuartz is the same software that's
> available in MacPorts in the xorg-* ports. The versions in MacPorts are
> just usually a little bit newer. I prefer to in
If you are using MacPorts, none, if you are not, then you can have x11 without
having to use MacPorts ;)
(And you don't waste cycles building it via MacPorts whenever something changes
...)
> Am 20.05.2014 um 23:06 schrieb Gustavo Seabra :
>
>> On May 20, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 20, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> And in case it's not clear, XQuartz is the same software that's available in
> MacPorts in the xorg-* ports. The versions in MacPorts are just usually a
> little bit newer. I prefer to install X11 with MacPorts for this reason, and
> because th
On May 20, 2014, at 10:39, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> I'm currently experiencing a build failure with the i386 branch of the
> universal pcrexx variant. As can be seen from the log, the demo code is
> compiled without the double -arch options, and thus gives "simple", 64bit
> object files that
On May 20, 2014, at 15:44, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> $ sudo port rev-upgrade
> ---> Scanning binaries for linking errors: 100.0%
> ---> No broken files found.
> $ perl -v
> dyld: Library not loaded:
> /opt/local/lib/perl5/5.16.1/darwin-thread-multi-2level/CORE/libperl.dylib
> Referenced from: /opt/
...And the ability to use a package manager to keep xorg updated.
On May 20, 2014, at 16:44, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> And in case it's not clear, XQuartz is the same software that's available in
> MacPorts in the xorg-* ports. The versions in MacPorts are just usually a
> little bit newer. I pref
On May 20, 2014, at 12:48, Roger Pack wrote:
> Hello all.
> Ran into this today:
> $ sudo port install wget
>
> $ wget https://sparsehash.googlecode.com/files/sparsehash-2.0.2.tar.gz
> --2014-05-20 11:43:44--
> https://sparsehash.googlecode.com/files/sparsehash-2.0.2.tar.gz
> Resolving sparsehas
On May 20, 2014, at 08:59, Frank Schima wrote:
> On May 20, 2014, at 4:27 AM, James Griffin wrote:
>
>> I wanted to run some xterms earlier and found I needed to install
>> XQuartz. Then I remembered (possibly incorrectly) that I could use X11
>> built using Macports.
>>
>> Would you say using
Dear Clemens and Ryan,
Thank you both for taking the time to give your thoughtful responses.
On 19/05/14 14:35 +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
Ensure you're up to date:
sudo port selfupdate
sudo port upgrade outdated
If you still have the problem, then try rebuilding perl5.16. That library i
Since you have curl-ca-bundle, the fix seems to be putting CA_CERTIFICATE in
~./wgetrc:
http://superuser.com/a/451857
On May 20, 2014, at 13:48, Roger Pack wrote:
> Hello all.
> Ran into this today:
> $ sudo port install wget
>
> $ wget https://sparsehash.googlecode.com/files/sparsehash-2.0.2.
Hello all.
Ran into this today:
$ sudo port install wget
$ wget https://sparsehash.googlecode.com/files/sparsehash-2.0.2.tar.gz
--2014-05-20 11:43:44--
https://sparsehash.googlecode.com/files/sparsehash-2.0.2.tar.gz
Resolving sparsehash.googlecode.com (sparsehash.googlecode.com)...
74.125.28.82, 2
I'm currently experiencing a build failure with the i386 branch of the
universal pcrexx variant. As can be seen from the log, the demo code is
compiled without the double -arch options, and thus gives "simple", 64bit
object files that will not link (because the link command is executed correctly
Hi Jamie,
On May 20, 2014, at 4:27 AM, James Griffin wrote:
> I wanted to run some xterms earlier and found I needed to install
> XQuartz. Then I remembered (possibly incorrectly) that I could use X11
> built using Macports.
>
> Would you say using the X11 implementation is better in terms of
Hi everyone,
I wanted to run some xterms earlier and found I needed to install
XQuartz. Then I remembered (possibly incorrectly) that I could use X11
built using Macports.
Would you say using the X11 implementation is better in terms of using
and availability of X applications, many of which I w
28 matches
Mail list logo
