In article <1496567.dPnP996dF6@patux>,
Rene J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Monday April 07 2014 23:58:37 Ned Deily wrote:
> > Don't even think of that! First, as you may know, most Apple-supplied
> > programs don't use OpenSSL anyway (at least since 10.7 when it was
>
> This I didn't know ...
Becau
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Kastus Shchuka wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Niels Dettenbach wrote:
> > But as far as i can read til now OpenSSH uses OpenSSL code not related to
> > TLS/SSL or the ASN.1 parser which is affected here - but yesterday and
> today
> > some distributors gave
On Apr 8, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Niels Dettenbach wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. April 2014, 20:03:30 schrieb Harald Hanche-Olsen:
>> But ssh does not use the openssl libraries, so there is no point, as
>> this bug will not have exposed the ssh host keys.
> hmm,
> i'm not deep into the OpenSSH developement
Am Dienstag, 8. April 2014, 20:03:30 schrieb Harald Hanche-Olsen:
> But ssh does not use the openssl libraries, so there is no point, as
> this bug will not have exposed the ssh host keys.
hmm,
i'm not deep into the OpenSSH developement yet, but i thought that OpenSSH
does even use (or at least im
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> But ssh does not use the openssl libraries, so there is no point, as
> this bug will not have exposed the ssh host keys.
>
Actually, it does use the libraries. But only for crypto; it does not use
the SSL protocol at all, and SSL-specif
[Niels Dettenbach (2014-04-08 12:46:27 UTC)]
> Anyhow: where server secret keys could be changed more easily (i.e. SSH host
> keys) this should be done.
But ssh does not use the openssl libraries, so there is no point, as
this bug will not have exposed the ssh host keys.
– Harald
_
On Monday April 07 2014 23:58:37 Ned Deily wrote:
> Don't even think of that! First, as you may know, most Apple-supplied
> programs don't use OpenSSL anyway (at least since 10.7 when it was
This I didn't know ...
> officially deprecated). Second, the Heartbleed bug only applies to
> OpenSSL
Hi,
> > Yes, I have CMD Line Tools installed but any port I tried to install I got
> > an error and none of them worked. I didn't face this issue with Homebrew
> > though so I thought I'll ask here as I might be doing sth wrong.
>
> My understanding is that Homebrew supports the use of the comman
Am Dienstag, 8. April 2014, 22:37:53 schrieb Joshua Root:
> > ...as far as i informed about the current security notice / patch in
> > OpenSSH (!) it makes no sense to generate new host or client keys. It
> > could make sense to delete the known_hosts as the sec flaw could make it
> > possible in c
Niels Dettenbach wrote:
> On 8. April 2014 05:34:28 MESZ, Ludwig wrote:
>>What else do I need to do about the addressed vulnerability besides
>>updating
>>the port — generate new keys or what?
>
> ...as far as i informed about the current security notice / patch in OpenSSH
> (!) it makes no sens
On Apr 8, 2014, at 07:33, Amarendra Kumar wrote:
> Yes, I have CMD Line Tools installed but any port I tried to install I got an
> error and none of them worked. I didn't face this issue with Homebrew though
> so I thought I'll ask here as I might be doing sth wrong.
My understanding is that H
Yes, I have CMD Line Tools installed but any port I tried to install I got
an error and none of them worked. I didn't face this issue with Homebrew
though so I thought I'll ask here as I might be doing sth wrong.
Also, can I use MacPorts even if Homebrew is installed? Homebrew throws
error and adv
On Apr 8, 2014, at 05:06, Amarendra Kumar wrote:
> The install instruction still starts with:
>
> "Install Xcode and the Xcode Command Line Tools"
>
> But I cannot afford to put aside 5+GB on my 120GB machine that I shall never
> use. So, is there any way or any beta MacPorts that doesn't requi
The install instruction still starts with:
"Install Xcode and the Xcode Command Line Tools"
But I cannot afford to put aside 5+GB on my 120GB machine that I shall
never use. So, is there any way or any beta MacPorts that doesn't require
"full Xcode" as a must?
Or is there a work around?
*PS*. A
On Apr 8, 2014, at 02:00, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> These days I spend my time switching back and forth between Linux/Debian and
> OS X. The various package management tools I use on the former (apt, apt-get,
> aptitude) all have a very similar syntax, but port has a number of
> just-or-comple
Hello,
This is a bit of a flyer/test ...
These days I spend my time switching back and forth between Linux/Debian and OS
X. The various package management tools I use on the former (apt, apt-get,
aptitude) all have a very similar syntax, but port has a number of
just-or-completely different com
16 matches
Mail list logo
