Re: MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread MK-MacPorts
On 19 Mar 2014, at 21:03 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> From what I can see, our tool will not gather whether a port was Requested >> or not. I think that's a key data point. Some libs will get installed very >> frequently as dependencies but will seldom be requested. > At the time of GSoC11, I d

Re: MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 7:43 PM -0700 3/19/14, Ludwig wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Craig Treleaven wrote: At 9:16 PM +0100 3/19/14, Clemens Lang wrote: > > Do we have a sample statistics page for a port/all ports? > >http://stats.macports.neverpanic.de/ Thanks, that helped a lot. I like the page layout, very

Re: MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread Ludwig
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Craig Treleaven wrote: > At 9:16 PM +0100 3/19/14, Clemens Lang wrote: > > > Do we have a sample statistics page for a port/all ports? > > > >http://stats.macports.neverpanic.de/ > > Thanks, that helped a lot. I like the page layout, very clean. I have to > say, though that

Re: MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 9:16 PM +0100 3/19/14, Clemens Lang wrote: > Do we have a sample statistics page for a port/all ports? http://stats.macports.neverpanic.de/ Thanks, that helped a lot. I like the page layout, very clean. I have to say, though that I'm not a big fan of pie (or donut) graphs. It is much e

Re: MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 5:49 PM -0400 3/19/14, Eric Gallager wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Clemens Lang <c...@macports.org> wrote: > What is the user wants to get rid of MacPorts and deletes /opt/local/*. My experience is that launchd will _never_ stop trying to run the mis

Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?

2014-03-19 Thread Davor Cubranic
On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Landon Fuller wrote: > They seemed to acquire a lot of traction on the basis of marketing; > specifically: > - Truthiness (an assortment of “advantages” that turned out not to be, > claims that ignored technical accuracy and nuance, and claims quite simply >

Re: MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread Eric Gallager
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: > Hi Craig, > > > As I understand it, the statistics process arose > > in GSOC 11, right? Is it pretty much as > > described at: > > > > [...] > > > > Is the above accurate? I understand that Popcon > > tracks the last access time (atime) for

Re: MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
On Mar 19, 2014, at 15:16, Craig Treleaven wrote: > As I understand it, the statistics process arose in GSOC 11, right? Is it > pretty much as described at: > https://trac.macports.org/wiki/MacPortsStatisticsGSoC2011 > There is a (short) thread about the proposal here: > https://lists.macosfor

Re: MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi Craig, > As I understand it, the statistics process arose > in GSOC 11, right? Is it pretty much as > described at: > > […] > > Is the above accurate? I understand that Popcon > tracks the last access time (atime) for files in > a port and that our implementation does not. Yes, that's corr

Re: MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Regarding the console spam, we can only avoid it if the user “cleanly" uninstalls MacPorts [1]. Then if the stats cron job is treated or installed as a typical port, the cron job would be uninstalled. However, if, as suggested, the user just deletes /opt/local/* then we can’t really cleanup any

MacPorts Statistics (was Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?)

2014-03-19 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 11:06 PM +0100 3/18/14, Rainer Müller wrote: On 2014-03-18 22:09, James Berry wrote: > * More integrated web app with better access to ports, etc. Which could also be integrated with the upcoming statistics gathering in the next MacPorts release. As I understand it, the statistics process

Re: glib user_data_dir set to /opt/local/share

2014-03-19 Thread Jonathan Koren
I guess I have to take back what I said about glib. I just installed it on a different machine, and now user_data_dir is set correctly (~/.local) Huh. Perhaps I need to check an environment variable, or maybe just reinstall all of MacPorts on the busted machine. It is strange though. It used to

Re: usage numbers for macports vs. homebrew?

2014-03-19 Thread Eric Gallager
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: > Hi, > > > No! Homebrew's search "functionality" is my biggest problem with it. The > > columns you mentioned make it hard to read because it makes it harder to > > see how they are sorted. The alphabetization seems to be in order by > column

Re: eigen

2014-03-19 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hello, On Wednesday March 19 2014 09:00:50 you wrote: > > In fact, I'm more interested in eigen 2, required by Calligra … > I do not remember the specific reason why eigen2 cannot build on Mavericks, > but in the case of calligra (which is not an official port, by the way, there > is only a ten

cairo / pango variant conflict?

2014-03-19 Thread Peter Danecek
Hi all, I was trying to update some ports and realised that I run into some variant conflict. However, I do not completely understand why these restrictions are in place and where they originate. I have cairo installed as cairo @1.12.16_2+quartz+universal+x11, with both x11 AND quartz activat