Re: Xcode command line version ...

2013-06-03 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sterling Smith wrote: > I seem to recall a lengthy discussion on this list about the need for the > full version of Xcode. You might search the list archives. There have been *many* discussions, to say the least. vq __

Re: X11 Macports vs. XQuartz Project

2013-06-03 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Peter Danecek wrote: > Just, one doubt: From Mac OS X 10.5 I was used to the fact that starting any > program using X11 would start up the X11.app automatically. How would I need > to set this up with the MacPorts' version? Is the XQuartz package setting up > this a

Re: X11 Macports vs. XQuartz Project

2013-06-03 Thread Peter Danecek
On 3 Jun 2013, at 21:13, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:57, Peter Danecek wrote: it's again about a fresh install of a OS X 10.8 system. I realise, there is no X11 package available from Apple anymore for this OS version. Still there two options to install X11. (1) or

Re: X11 Macports vs. XQuartz Project

2013-06-03 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:57, Peter Danecek wrote: > it's again about a fresh install of a OS X 10.8 system. I realise, there is > no X11 package available from Apple anymore for this OS version. Still there > two options to install X11. > > (1) org-server via MacPorts > (2) the packag

Re: Xcode command line version ...

2013-06-03 Thread Ryan Schmidt
Am 03.06.2013 um 18:47 schrieb Peter Danecek: > I installed the full version of Xcode. Just for curiosity, what is the good > reason, that MacPort needs the full version? I see that the full version > installs into a different location. Is there a clean way to remove the > command line version

Re: Xcode command line version ...

2013-06-03 Thread Sterling Smith
Peter, I seem to recall a lengthy discussion on this list about the need for the full version of Xcode. You might search the list archives. -Sterling On Jun 3, 2013, at 10:03AM, Dominik Reichardt wrote: > Don't forget to reply to all ;) > > The reason is that this way the foundation is the s

Re: Xcode command line version ...

2013-06-03 Thread Dominik Reichardt
Don't forget to reply to all ;) The reason is that this way the foundation is the same for everyone. Some ports require Xcode as well as the command line tools. Others might give you a more in depth answer ;) Dom Am 03.06.2013 um 18:47 schrieb Peter Danecek : > > Okay, > I installed the ful

X11 Macports vs. XQuartz Project

2013-06-03 Thread Peter Danecek
Hi all, it's again about a fresh install of a OS X 10.8 system. I realise, there is no X11 package available from Apple anymore for this OS version. Still there two options to install X11. (1) org-server via MacPorts (2) the package form the XQuartz Project So what are the pro

Re: Xcode command line version ...

2013-06-03 Thread Dominik Reichardt
Hi, Full Xcode is needed ;) Dom Am 03.06.2013 um 17:50 schrieb Peter Danecek : > > Hi all, > > I am about to install a new Mac from scratch and have some doubt. I installed > only the small command line version of Xcode, as I assumed this would be > sufficient for Macports. > > However, whe

Xcode command line version ...

2013-06-03 Thread Peter Danecek
Hi all, I am about to install a new Mac from scratch and have some doubt. I installed only the small command line version of Xcode, as I assumed this would be sufficient for Macports. However, when I install software I get the following error: --- snip --- […] Error: Error: No Xcode installa

Re: ImageMagick appears broken.

2013-06-03 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 3, 2013, at 09:50, David Barto wrote: > I'm doing a fresh install to upgrade to Mt. Lion - format/install Mt. > Lion/install macports as needed. > > On a co-workers Mac, he has ImageMagick @6.8.0-7_2+q16 (active) and it is > installed properly. > > My install is for 'ImageMagick

ImageMagick appears broken.

2013-06-03 Thread David Barto
I'm doing a fresh install to upgrade to Mt. Lion - format/install Mt. Lion/install macports as needed. On a co-workers Mac, he has ImageMagick @6.8.0-7_2+q16 (active) and it is installed properly. My install is for 'ImageMagick@6.8.5-5 graphics/ImageMagick' as report