Re: 'No manual entry for port'

2013-05-02 Thread Ian Wadham
On 03/05/2013, at 1:40 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> As I understand Unix-like systems, there are three scripts that can >> operate when you are logging in: .login, .profile and .rc. >> Also, that there is a convention that these scripts should be compatible >> with the Bourne Shell, or nowadays "

Re: 'No manual entry for port'

2013-05-02 Thread Ian Wadham
On 03/05/2013, at 9:31 AM, Adam Neather wrote: > Cheers much. For some reason, the setenv command worked this time; > where as before it didn't. The ~/.tcshrc file has been created (as > both of the open -e commands listed above reported no such file) and > port is working correctly. Huzzah! Somet

Re: 'No manual entry for port'

2013-05-02 Thread Adam Neather
Cheers much. For some reason, the setenv command worked this time; where as before it didn't. The ~/.tcshrc file has been created (as both of the open -e commands listed above reported no such file) and port is working correctly. Huzzah! Regarding the scipy sub-issue, I just ran 'sudo port install

Re: 'No manual entry for port'

2013-05-02 Thread Adam Neather
Thanks for the reply, Sterling. The command "open ~./cshrc" gives the result "The file /Users/username/.cshrc does not exist." Which just adds to my confusion. Also, there seems to be some uncertainty as to what I'm asking for help with, and to what steps I have taken. I would just like to reiter