On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 01:44:00AM -0500, Lawrence Vel?zquez wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2013, at 12:29 AM, Jim Graham wrote:
>
> > The mystery, however, is how tclsh8.5 managed to remove itself from
> > /opt/local/bin without my removing it or giving anything else the
> > permission to remove it. But I
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:33:40PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 23:29, Jim Graham wrote:
>
> > Btw, I have the logs for the lmms and kdenlive build failures if anyone
> > can offer any suggestions on how to fix those. I can post either the
> > edited logs (from the point wh
On Feb 24, 2013, at 12:29 AM, Jim Graham wrote:
> The mystery, however, is how tclsh8.5 managed to remove itself from
> /opt/local/bin without my removing it or giving anything else the
> permission to remove it. But I suppose we'll never know the answer
> to that...beyond just "gremlins"
On Feb 23, 2013, at 23:29, Jim Graham wrote:
> Btw, I have the logs for the lmms and kdenlive build failures if anyone
> can offer any suggestions on how to fix those. I can post either the
> edited logs (from the point where thigns start to go wrong) or the full
> logs (MUCH longer).
If your l
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:00:16AM -0500, Lawrence Vel?zquez wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
>
> The tcl port was updated to Tcl 8.6 two months ago.
Yeah, but somewhere in there, as I understand it, Tcl's syntax made some
significant changes that (again, as I understand
On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
> Just more of the errors I've run into since upgrading macports---the
> first thing I had to do tonight was rebuild tclsh8.5, even though it had
> already been installed with the older version of macports---the current
> version said it didn't exis
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 09:49:06PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:24:43PM -0500, Craig Treleaven wrote:
(I hope I got those right)
> > > port search kdenlive
> > kdenlive @0.9.4 (multimedia)
> > A non-linear video editing suite.
>
> Thanks. I'll build that as soon as
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:24:43PM -0500, Craig Treleaven wrote:
> At 8:45 PM -0600 2/23/13, Jim Graham wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 06:30:05PM -0800, Scott Webster wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
> >>
> > > I use kdenlive.
> >Never heard of it. Is it in macpor
At 8:45 PM -0600 2/23/13, Jim Graham wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 06:30:05PM -0800, Scott Webster wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
> For those familiar with it, I'm looking for some video editing software,
> I use kdenlive.
Never heard of it. Is it in macports,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 06:30:05PM -0800, Scott Webster wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
> > For those familiar with it, I'm looking for some video editing software,
>
> I use kdenlive.
Never heard of it. Is it in macports, or online? I'll look into it.
Thanks,
-
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 02:07:41AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Feb 23 18:15:16, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I'm also hoping there's some audio editing software that can do things
> > like work on either channel of stereo, merge stereo into mono,
> > add/delete/edit audio chunks, combine audio
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 01:38:20AM +0100, Richard R. Cahilig wrote:
> Video Editor - Avidemux Avidemux is a free video editor designed for
> simple cutting, filtering and encoding tasks. It supports many file
> types, including AVI, DVD compatible MPEG files, MP4 and ASF, using a
> variety of codec
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
> For those familiar with it, I'm looking for some video editing software,
I use kdenlive.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listin
On Feb 23 18:15:16, spooky1...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm also hoping there's some audio editing software that can do things
> like work on either channel of stereo, merge stereo into mono,
> add/delete/edit audio chunks, combine audio samples (in series), blend them,
> modify volume level (overall or
Video Editor - Avidemux
Avidemux is a free video editor designed for simple cutting, filtering and
encoding tasks. It supports many file types, including AVI, DVD compatible MPEG
files, MP4 and ASF, using a variety of codecs. Tasks can be automated using
projects, job queue and powerful scriptin
For those familiar with it, I'm looking for some video editing software,
preferably as similar (in capabilities) as Virtualdub on 'doze, something
that can edit by frames, join, split, convert, filter (de-noise, resize,
crop, de-interlace, adjust frame rate to match audio (mainly for vid
caps), and
On Feb 23 21:53:13, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
>
> > The top section says that macports is
> >
> > targeting mainly the current Mac OS X release (10.8, A.K.A. Mountain Lion)
> > and the immediately previous two (10.7, A.K.A. Lion and 10.6, A.K.A. Snow
> > Leopard).
> >
> > It might be ni
On Feb 23, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Feb 23 12:43:10, pixi...@macports.org wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> With MacPort's perl 5.12, the ex
> The top section says that macports is
>
> targeting mainly the current Mac OS X release (10.8, A.K.A. Mountain Lion)
> and the immediately previous two (10.7, A.K.A. Lion and 10.6, A.K.A. Snow
> Leopard).
>
> It might be nitpicking, but "targeting mainly" is not quite the same
> as saying e
On Feb 23 17:31:17, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23 Feb 2013, at 05:17 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > On Feb 23 16:17:26, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> Are binary packages for darwin9 being built?
> >>
> >> I think not. They are only available for OSX 10.6 (da
On Feb 23 12:43:10, pixi...@macports.org wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> >>> With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable is installed in
> >>> /opt/local/libexec/pe
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> Why would macports even care about something
> 'not installed by a portfile' (which I read:
> not installed via macports)?
MacPorts doesn't. Which is in some sense the problem: MacPorts can't
protect you from some port inappropriately findin
On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
>>> With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable is installed in
>>> /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin
>>> which is *NOT* where people expect to find
On Feb 23 12:49:48, bruce.mil...@nist.gov wrote:
> On 02/23/2013 12:44 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> >On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> >>On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> >>>With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable is installed in
> >>> /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebi
On Feb 21 22:02:19, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Bruce R Miller wrote:
> > But a "plain perl" used from commands like
> > perl Makefile.PL
> > will use the more common installation directories,
> > like macports used to do, and every other OS does.
It does now, doesn'
On Feb 21 18:19:56, bruce.mil...@nist.gov wrote:
> As much as you or I may like to stay within managed packages,
> you never can keep up with CPAN and shouldn't try.
Why can't you? Why shouldn't you try?
Whenever there is stuff in CPAN that you want to have
on your macos, make a port of it, and i
On Feb 21 11:46:29, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> > And, let's be frank; Macs cater (wisely, perhaps) to
> > a group of users who don't know about, or want to know about, $PATH.
>
> ... and those people tend to not ever use the terminal ... ;-)
>
On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> > With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable is installed in
> > /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin
> > which is *NOT* where people expect to find programs.
> > And it's NOT a directory people want
On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>
>> On Feb 23, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 23, 2013, at 01:23, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>>>
I just tried to restore my full /opt/local directory using timem
On Feb 23, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Feb 23, 2013, at 01:23, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>>
>>> I just tried to restore my full /opt/local directory using timemachine from
>>> about two weeks ago. If I then do a sync and try
On Feb 23, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Feb 23 16:17:26, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Are binary packages for darwin9 being built?
>>
>> I think not. They are only available for OSX 10.6 (darwin 10) onwards.
>> https://build.macports.org/waterfall
>
> I think http:
On 02/23/2013 12:44 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable is installed in
/opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin
On my MacOSX 10.5.8. with macports 2.1.3 it is not, thank go
On Feb 21 11:05:23, dl...@geeklair.net wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Miller wrote:
> > With MacPort's perl 5.12, the executable is installed in
> > /opt/local/libexec/perl5.12/sitebin
On my MacOSX 10.5.8. with macports 2.1.3 it is not, thank god:
hans@mac:~$ cd /opt/local/bin/
ha
Hi,
On 23 Feb 2013, at 05:17 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Feb 23 16:17:26, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Are binary packages for darwin9 being built?
>>
>> I think not. They are only available for OSX 10.6 (darwin 10) onwards.
>> https://build.macports.org/waterfall
>
> I think h
On Feb 23 16:17:26, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Are binary packages for darwin9 being built?
>
> I think not. They are only available for OSX 10.6 (darwin 10) onwards.
> https://build.macports.org/waterfall
I think http://guide.macports.org/#using.binaries
should be explicit abou
On Feb 23, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 01:23, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>
>> I just tried to restore my full /opt/local directory using timemachine from
>> about two weeks ago. If I then do a sync and try to upgrade
>> gst-plugins-base, the same thing happens. I
Hi,
> Are binary packages for darwin9 being built?
I think not. They are only available for OSX 10.6 (darwin 10) onwards.
https://build.macports.org/waterfall
Chris
> I haven't found this information in the Guide
> or in the FAQ.
>
>Jan
>
> ___
I am trying to install SoX using a binary package on my 10.5.8
which is
$ uname -a
Darwin mac.stare.cz 9.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.8.0: Wed Jul 15
16:55:01 PDT 2009; root:xnu-1228.15.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
The attempt to install with
sudo port -v -b install sox
fails and the log says
On Feb 23, 2013, at 01:23, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> I just tried to restore my full /opt/local directory using timemachine from
> about two weeks ago. If I then do a sync and try to upgrade
> gst-plugins-base, the same thing happens. It first successfully upgrades a
> bunch of different thing
39 matches
Mail list logo
