On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
[...]
> This appears to be yet another instance of the problem reported in
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/32090, At some point port py27-xml was
> installed. That port is now obsolete and has been deleted. You need to
> uninstall it and g
In article <7108a9c5-5b17-4393-ac49-6631397e0...@macports.org>,
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2012, at 14:40, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> > When I do port install dosbox it tries to re-install Python 2.7.3_1
> >
> > sudo port install dosbox
> > ---> Computing dependencies for python27
> > --
On Nov 16, 2012, at 20:49, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> Is there another DOS emulator I could try?
Not that I'm aware of. There's virtualbox, if you want a more full-featured PC
emulator.
> Also, just why doesn't Python27 show up as a dependency for dosbox??
python27 is not a direct dependency
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> Also, just why doesn't Python27 show up as a dependency for dosbox??
>
Presumably it's an indirect dependency. dosbox appears to depend on
several SDL components, one of which may drag python27 in along the way.
--
brandon s allbery kf8
On Nov 16, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Nov 16, 2012, at 14:40, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
>>> When I do port install dosbox it tries to re-install Python 2.7.3_1
>>>
> [...]
>> python27 is installed non-universal (for x86
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2012, at 14:40, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
>> When I do port install dosbox it tries to re-install Python 2.7.3_1
>>
[...]
> python27 is installed non-universal (for x86_64 only). dosbox only builds
> 32-bit. Therefore MacPorts is tr
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 2012, at 14:48, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
>> If you have a bunch of modules that you installed yourself (not with
>> macports) then you'll have to deal with them yourself as well.
>
> We usually recommend you not install perl modu
On Nov 16, 2012, at 14:48, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> If you have a bunch of modules that you installed yourself (not with
> macports) then you'll have to deal with them yourself as well.
We usually recommend you not install perl modules yourself, nor install any
other software into the MacPorts
On Nov 16, 2012, at 14:40, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> When I do port install dosbox it tries to re-install Python 2.7.3_1
>
> sudo port install dosbox
> ---> Computing dependencies for python27
> ---> Staging python27 into destroot
>
> But Python is already installed:
>
> port installed python2
I failed to update the topic on my previous message. Here it is again for
the record and clarity.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Eric A. Borisch wrote:
> I'm considering updating the 'mpich' portfile to version 3.0rc1; this is
> currently available as 'mpich3.'
>
> Background: The upstream proj
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>> :info:destroot ImportError:
>> dlopen(/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/_xmlplus/parsers/pyexpat.so,
>> 2): no suitable image found. Did find:
>> :info:destroot
>> /opt/local/Library/F
On Nov 16, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> I still don't understand very well how MacPorts layers the older
> versions of stuff.
Maybe the guide helps? http://guide.macports.org/#internals.images
> In other words, all this happened when I upgraded
> Perl. I work with Catalyst so I had
> :info:destroot ImportError:
> dlopen(/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/_xmlplus/parsers/pyexpat.so,
> 2): no suitable image found. Did find:
> :info:destroot
> /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-pac
Hi,
I'm trying to install dosbox
port deps dosbox
Full Name: dosbox @0.74_5
Library Dependencies: libsdl, libsdl_net, libsdl_sound, libpng
When I do port install dosbox it tries to re-install Python 2.7.3_1
sudo port install dosbox
---> Computing dependencies for python27
---> Staging python2
> Thread 0 Crashed: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
> 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x7fff85270c00 strlen + 16
> 1 Tcl 0x00010008a350 Tcl_SetResult + 83
> 2 Pextlib.dylib 0x00010070e617
> SetResultFromCurlErrorCode +
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Jeremy Lavergne
wrote:
>> I cut the sentence short here and makes no sense. What I meant to say
[...]
>> to fix it so that is what I'm asking: Is there a way to increase the
>> verbosity or something that would tell me exactly what binaries it's
>> referring to ?
> I cut the sentence short here and makes no sense. What I meant to say
> is that it would seem that some binaries depend on dylibs that are
> actually part of Perl modules and that seems really weird. I have no
> way of finding out exactly which binaries were depending on these
> dylibs.
>
> Exam
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Alejandro Imass
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> fix on Perl but it didn't. Also, I can't seem to get port to tell me
> port command only. Apparently there are s
Maybe the RPMs from jpackage.org can be installed
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Neuenschwander"
To: macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:32:34 AM
Subject: Java Open Source software in MacPorts?
Hi
do you package also Java based FOSS?
Markus
_
I'm on a Mac Pro running 10.6.8. Did a selfupdate (to 2.1.2)
and now anything I try to do that involves a fetch is croaking
with a Segmentation fault:
[4:06] nightowl:~ % sudo port -v
MacPorts 2.1.2
Entering interactive mode... ("help" for help, "quit" to quit)
[Users/earle] > upgrade outdated
-
I'm considering updating the 'mpich' portfile to version 3.0rc1; this is
currently available as 'mpich3.'
Background: The upstream project has changed naming conventions; they
previously had mpich (now at 1.2.7p1) and mpich2 (at 1.5). With the
implementation of the MPI-3 standard (mpich2 was MPI-2
At 5:40 PM +0100 11/16/12, Clemens Lang wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:32:34PM +0100, Markus Neuenschwander wrote:
do you package also Java based FOSS?
Yes.
See:
http://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=category&substr=java
___
macports-users mai
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:32:34PM +0100, Markus Neuenschwander wrote:
> do you package also Java based FOSS?
Yes.
--
Clemens Lang
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macport
Hi
do you package also Java based FOSS?
Markus
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
24 matches
Mail list logo
