On 1 October 2011 05:11, Scott Webster wrote:
> I don't claim to have all the answers, but recently when I had to
> compile a "new" latex document I got from a colleague I found that it
> was not compatible with the macports versions. So I installed
> MacTex2011. It has a great prefpane to let y
On 28 June 2012 16:24, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2012, at 11:18 a.m., Brandon Allbery wrote:
>> A leaf is an *unrequested* port without dependents, i.e. the unwanted
>> dependencies left behind when you remove a port that you explicitly
>> installed (and hence had the requested flag
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
> A leaf is an *unrequested* port without dependents, i.e. the unwanted
> dependencies left behind when you remove a port that you explicitly
> installed (and hence had the requested flag set).
Also, build requirements like compilers that
On Jun 28, 2012, at 11:18 a.m., Brandon Allbery wrote:
> A leaf is an *unrequested* port without dependents, i.e. the unwanted
> dependencies left behind when you remove a port that you explicitly installed
> (and hence had the requested flag set).
And a port is requested if you did "port insta
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Sam Kuper wrote:
> My understanding of leaves is that a leaf is a port without
> dependents. Yet when I run "port echo leaves", the response does not
> include "wireshark".
>
> Please can you help clear up my confusion?
>
A leaf is an *unrequested* port without
Entering the command "port dependents wireshark" produces the response
"wireshark has no dependents."
My understanding of leaves is that a leaf is a port without
dependents. Yet when I run "port echo leaves", the response does not
include "wireshark".
Please can you help clear up my confusion?
M
